A.J. Miller, Australia's Reincarnated Jesus

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
[youtube]ML2Oa4Oigvo&[/youtube]

Lots of interesting information in this clip.. Sad shit.

(Hey Canna, I'll get back to your bump soon, I'm a little inebriated atm)
 

tyler.durden

Well-Known Member
You'd think jesus would be able to sing and play guitar better than that. Let's see some miracles, dude, and dump the whiteboard and get into PowerPoint...
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
You'd think jesus would be able to sing and play guitar better than that. Let's see some miracles, dude, and dump the whiteboard and get PowerPoint...
Mother fucker is so arrogant he writes "I'm Jesus deal with it" on a board in front of his followers..


I'm 3/4 of the way through the clip right now and I'm experiencing some mixed emotions..

As always happens with shit like this, half of me feels total pity people could possibly be this ignorant, especially today, in a first world country where you don't have to be. The other part of me is hoping they keep getting fucked because they're so goddamn stupid, the instinctual level of Darwinism in me wants these people to be wiped off the face of the planet, and being so goddamn stupid, it's likely they will be, so I subconsciously enjoy it (and feel quite guilty about it because I know it's wrong..).

This dude is lying to so many people, the people closest to him. I know, deep down, he does not believe the shit he's preaching. His 'wife', Mary, is completely taken in by it, she's 100% sold. She doesn't look any older than 25, still a goddamn kid. This dude is 13 years older than she is, he's totally taking advantage of her to get sexual advances. I know it would be tough to legislate against shit like this, and it's kind of a gray area and a fine line, but dude, he is mind raping this chick, literally, for some pussy. That's not wrong because it's in the name of religion?

I think it's time to take a stand against stuff like this, legally.

I think this guy should be able to legally be arrested for pulling something like this.

We should have a law that stipulates you're fully within your rights to practice your religion however you see fit, but as soon as it involves another person, you're required to provide proof of your religion. Proof in the form of scientific evidence, objectively verifiable. If you can't provide proof, you are not legally allowed to preach or hold public 'sermons'. You're also not legally allowed to receive 'donations' or 'contributions' from anyone. You're also not tax exempt. What is wrong with those stipulations?
 
Top