dude you dont know shit i cant find any thing saying that we let terrist fly out of the country like i said no matter how many facts we show to your stupid ass. your just gonna keep posting fake made up facts rofl if this were true i would have herd about it by now on tv in the news paper some where nooo but where did i get this info from? some crack pot on a marajuana form rofl real credible people no offence everyone who isnt so dumb to belive kendars bull shit. he must have been but fu*ked when he was little it has trammatized him so much he has to go around makeing up conspiraceys about everything let me gusse you belive obama is the anti christ to lol people like you crack pots like you are the least credible people to get info from i would much rather read facts and real studys not some profesinol conspiracy therists opinion.
You are avoiding the issue with disinformation tactics:
5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary attack the messenger ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as "kooks", "right-wing", "liberal", "left-wing", "terrorists", "conspiracy buffs", "radicals", "militia", "racists", "religious fanatics", "sexual deviates", and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.
9. Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues with denial they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect.
12. Enigmas have no solution. Drawing upon the overall umbrella of events surrounding the crime and the multitude of players and events, paint the entire affair as too complex to solve. This causes those otherwise following the matter to begin to loose interest more quickly without having to address the actual issues.
19. Ignore proof presented, demand impossible proofs. This is perhaps a variant of the "play dumb" rule. Regardless of what material may be presented by an opponent in public forums, claim the material irrelevant and demand proof that is impossible for the opponent to come by (it may exist, but not be at his disposal, or it may be something which is known to be safely destroyed or withheld, such as a murder weapon). In order to completely avoid discussing issues may require you to categorically deny and be critical of media or books as valid sources, deny that witnesses are acceptable, or even deny that statements made by government or other authorities have any meaning or relevance.
http://web.archive.org/web/20070118165142/http://www.benfrank.net/disinfo/
