timmmy2021
Well-Known Member
well thats encouraging... thanks!
I don't think those bulbs have a ballast in them. Read the box carefully. I believe they need to be installed in a fixture that has it's own ballast. In my experience, if it has a mogul base chances are good it is not a self-ballasted lamp.
FWIW, here is the ballast inside of a 105w CFL that I have (regular, not mogul socket). It's an identical bulb to the 105watter that ebay guy also sells (got mine from 1000bulbs though).
![]()
I experimented with various CFL's for a while. Eventually I decided they are fools gold for my circumstances. Sometimes I wish I could get my money back from the CFL's that I now have laying around.
i had them from my 65w lights same socket
i looked at the ballast form mine and the 100w lights they where the same . i got mine out of 65w spot light. theirs also a 45? or 47w fluorex light but i think it has a smaller socket?? the one hundred watt bulbs said they where 1000w....and i have two of them![]()
thanks well explained thats exactly why i went and got an 400 watt hps..figure you gonna do it dont take half stepsthe hole using cfl's was a waste of money. I have 420 actual watts in flower box, and if it was full could use more. spent over $100 and could have a 400w hps for less. Switching soon just trying to figure how to cool the bulb for less than a cool tube and extra blower.42 watters are fairly hot too. the built in ballast is probably hotter than the bulb. Pic of the 65 watt light.
get a 150 hps for 69.99 that will be better than a 1000 watt cfl
what will i get with my cfl???
i would have to buy new ballaster first but hps sound like they work alot better. but heat is alot more with hps so not sure