4 days of drying and my buds are crispy and crumble upon touch

Mr.DS-420

Mr.DS-420

Well-Known Member
PURPLEB3RRYKUSH said:
It's true research is being done
Click to expand...
Where is this said research? Without any proof, that comment just seems asinine.

You should try growing some photo strains from top notch breeders. If you think autos are more terpy than photos, you are growing the wrong cultivars.

I'm not saying autos don't have any desirable traits. I just don't honestly think they can match terps and potency of GOOD photo period cultivars.
 
PURPLEB3RRYKUSH

PURPLEB3RRYKUSH

Well-Known Member
Mr.DS-420 said:
Where is this said research? Without any proof, that comment just seems asinine.

You should try growing some photo strains from top notch breeders. If you think autos are more terpy than photos, you are growing the wrong cultivars.

I'm not saying autos don't have any desirable traits. I just don't honestly think they can match terps and potency of GOOD photo period cultivars.
Click to expand...
They top the photos in tricombs and terpines if u get from the right breeder, if u know u know
 
PURPLEB3RRYKUSH

PURPLEB3RRYKUSH

Well-Known Member
Mr.DS-420 said:
Where is this said research? Without any proof, that comment just seems asinine.

You should try growing some photo strains from top notch breeders. If you think autos are more terpy than photos, you are growing the wrong cultivars.

I'm not saying autos don't have any desirable traits. I just don't honestly think they can match terps and potency of GOOD photo period cultivars.
Click to expand...
20240504_201747.jpg
 
amneziaHaze

amneziaHaze

Well-Known Member
RookieHaze said:
Yeah, other than the fact I did not use a fan. Is seriously no one reading the previous messages on this thread
Click to expand...
But you are using one.and if its too fast its basicly like blowing on the leafs. You probably have outside humidity low and its replacing the tent air too fast allsoo humidity meters can easily lie 10% and a few % makes a huge differance
 
U

UnknownRemedy

Well-Known Member
Mr.DS-420 said:
Where is this said research? Without any proof, that comment just seems asinine.

You should try growing some photo strains from top notch breeders. If you think autos are more terpy than photos, you are growing the wrong cultivars.

I'm not saying autos don't have any desirable traits. I just don't honestly think they can match terps and potency of GOOD photo period cultivars.
Click to expand...
I can grow bag seed with more terps than an auto flower.
tstick said:
Auto flowering marijuana is a relatively new "thing" and I think it panders to younger crowds who grew up with it. If it's no different other than light schedule, then why does it look and grow differently? That's an indication that it's definitely not the same type of plant. In my view, why even bother with it? Is photo period marijuana so difficult to grow that there needs to be an alternative? I don't think so. Plus, most auto flower stuff doesn't really even resemble the same plant that I grow. Auto flower weed looks like "Cleopatra" from the Addams Family! Anyway, to each his own. I have been a marijuana user since 1974 so I grew up with landrace marijuana and that's where legit breeders need to put their energy, in my opinion. Everything that made landrace marijuana great has been lost to modern hybridization. Breeders should be working on bringing it back. Why breeders are wasting their time with auto flowering stuff, I have no idea. There's no real need for it. I guess it's an achievement just for the sake of doing it....? I don't know. You tell me.
Click to expand...
I like you old man, keep growing that dank ass sticky bud!
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top