2016 Already Smashing Heat Records

Corso312

Well-Known Member
all of that info is extremely relative to the fact we have no ideas what those same metrics were 1000 years ago. that is where the whole "man-made climate change" argument falls apart. quite literally. i mean hell, gore, the poster child of man-made climate change said the polar ice caps would be non-existent in what....2013? and they've actually grown.





I agree that we don't know climate records from 1k years ago...but are you suggesting that the complete deforestation of the rainforests and forests. In General worldwide and heavy pollution of our oceans and lakes has no effect on our climate?
 

b4ds33d

Well-Known Member
I agree that we don't know climate records from 1k years ago...but are you suggesting that the complete deforestation of the rainforests and forests. In General worldwide and heavy pollution of our oceans and lakes has no effect on our climate?
did you see anywhere in my post where i said even a little of what you just said? fuck no. we've totally fucked the overall cleanliness of the planet without a doubt. and the piss of that are events like the EPA destroying the Animas River. my only assertion is exactly what i posted. there is not, nor will there ever be conclusive data to suggest the changing temperatures on the planet are caused by man.
 
that's a simple-minded defeatist way of thinking. it will take you far in life.
43 now, not sure how far this life is, but it is very short in the grand scheme of time. I think it's more a realistic view when you look at how humans are behaving, but each to his own.
 
did you see anywhere in my post where i said even a little of what you just said? fuck no. we've totally fucked the overall cleanliness of the planet without a doubt. and the piss of that are events like the EPA destroying the Animas River. my only assertion is exactly what i posted. there is not, nor will there ever be conclusive data to suggest the changing temperatures on the planet are caused by man.
97% of the experts disagree with you.

http://www.skepticalscience.com/global-warming-scientific-consensus-intermediate.htm
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
LoL common sense and education don't need experts to "agree." Maybe if you knew how the studies that disagree were conducted and who funded them, that might give you some insight.
Right, so you're willing to accept the evidence compiled by the fossil fuel industry (no conflict of interest there..) against anthropogenic climate change over the evidence compiled by more than 30 independent scientific academies and multiple international scientific organizations like NASA and NOAA in support for anthropogenic climate change..

That seems pretty stupid
 

b4ds33d

Well-Known Member
Right, so you're willing to accept the evidence compiled by the fossil fuel industry (no conflict of interest there..) against anthropogenic climate change over the evidence compiled by more than 30 independent scientific academies and multiple international scientific organizations like NASA and NOAA in support for anthropogenic climate change..

That seems pretty stupid
Listen shitstain, my beliefs do not require you to agree or your permission to think differently. So now, politely fuck off.
 

b4ds33d

Well-Known Member
Strange how your mind is ill at ease when people don't agree with you. Keep the herd mentality to yourself pal. It's bullshit, you are just gonna have to get over that, and the get over that I don't agree with you. Maturity comes late to some, and never to most.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Strange how your mind is ill at ease when people don't agree with you. Keep the herd mentality to yourself pal. It's bullshit, you are just gonna have to get over that, and the get over that I don't agree with you. Maturity comes late to some, and never to most.
Everybody agrees with me

"The scientific consensus is that the Earth's climate system is unequivocally warming, and that it is extremely likely (meaning 95% probability or higher) that humans are causing most of it through activities that increase concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, such as deforestation and the burning of fossil fuels. In addition, it is likely that some potential further greenhouse gas warming has been offset by increased aerosols."

Fringe ignoramuses and Fox News viewers are the only ones that don't, which one are you?
 

Tektek

Well-Known Member
all of that info is extremely relative to the fact we have no ideas what those same metrics were 1000 years ago. that is where the whole "man-made climate change" argument falls apart. quite literally. i mean hell, gore, the poster child of man-made climate change said the polar ice caps would be non-existent in what....2013? and they've actually grown.
We have excellent climate data for 100k years, and good data for 1M years. Easy to find with google.
 
Top