BART Employees Strike Again Despite Earning $30,000 More Than Typical San Fran Worker

Alright, we're going to need to square these facts then. See this article from the Chicago Tribune: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-san-francisco-transit-strike-20131018,0,608333.story. This says the union was claiming average worker pay of $64,000 while BART was claiming $79,000. The implication, though, is that management salaries are excluded from these averages, which you just contradicted.

I found this article from earlier in the summer as well: http://www.mercurynews.com/bart/ci_23742276/bart-workers-paychecks-already-outpace-their-peers. This puts the average worker's salary at $76,000, and they explicitly say that management and police officers have been excluded such that the number reflects only line-level union workers.

I stated the base pay average of $56,000 with $10,000 overtime (these figures change slightly with different sources) which adds up to $66,000. Basic math.

For you second point about management pay being specifically excluded, apparently you didn't read the article close enough because the only mention of both employee and managerial pay says the exact opposite: "Overall, BART's average employee -- executives included made nearly $30,000 more than employees at Los Angeles' transit line".

One reason for the disproportionate wages was the BART systems unique and antiquated system which requires specially made parts and the knowledge to install them properly. Maybe Los Angeles has a lazy union?
 
Not everyone has a rich bitch to mooch off, limited means...

Due to your avatar, political views, and attitude this is how I picture you:

dannymcbridehench.jpg
 
Due to your avatar, political views, and attitude this is how I picture you:

dannymcbridehench.jpg

KP rocks - thanks for the compliment... I would put up a picture of how I see you, but who wants to see a marxist tongue kissing obamas peehole? Buck is enough thank you...
 
KP rocks - thanks for the compliment... I would put up a picture of how I see you, but who wants to see a marxist tongue kissing obamas peehole? Buck is enough thank you...

Well that just reinforced my hunch, considering this is the abrasive actor with a perpetual mullet who plays a disabled hick.

What's a marxist again E-fag?
 
Well that just reinforced my hunch, considering this is the abrasive actor with a perpetual mullet who plays a disabled hick.

A perfect snapshot of American culture; overly represented on this board, designed to elicits responses from morons like you... Thanks for playing doc...

What's a marxist again E-fag?

E-Fag? What ever happened to "socialism not being homophobic"...

Karl Marx.jpg
 
I've spent the whole weekend writing an essay on this. I've listened to hours of the two sides arguing on public radio over the course of three months, read BART's financial section on it's website, read all the articles I can find on it, and I just have to say this is the fucking driest subject I've ever had to do a paper on. Both sides are guilty of lying.

considering the power of the BART union, all of SF should Prepare Themselves For A Rough Ride.

bacon-scented-anal-lube.jpg
 
I stated the base pay average of $56,000 with $10,000 overtime (these figures change slightly with different sources) which adds up to $66,000. Basic math.

For you second point about management pay being specifically excluded, apparently you didn't read the article close enough because the only mention of both employee and managerial pay says the exact opposite: "Overall, BART's average employee -- executives included made nearly $30,000 more than employees at Los Angeles' transit line".

One reason for the disproportionate wages was the BART systems unique and antiquated system which requires specially made parts and the knowledge to install them properly. Maybe Los Angeles has a lazy union?

No, evidently you didn't read the article. "And the results are not close. Even when eliminating high-paid police officers and executives, the average gross pay for the blue-collar BART union workers who are threatening another shutdown was $76,551 last year..." This is what you quoted: "Overall, BART's average employee -- executives included -- made nearly $30,000 more than employees at Los Angeles' transit line, and nearly $10,000 more than those at San Francisco Muni, the state's second-highest paid transit workers." Totally distinct. The first statement is about how much an average worker makes, excluding management; the second statement is about how BART salaries, including management, compare to salaries of other transportation workers.
 
I've spent the whole weekend writing an essay on this. I've listened to hours of the two sides arguing on public radio over the course of three months, read BART's financial section on it's website, read all the articles I can find on it, and I just have to say this is the fucking driest subject I've ever had to do a paper on. Both sides are guilty of lying.


Which side is guilty of taking money from the public, whether the public wants to do it or not?
 
I stated the base pay average of $56,000 with $10,000 overtime (these figures change slightly with different sources) which adds up to $66,000. Basic math. For you second point about management pay being specifically excluded, apparently you didn't read the article close enough because the only mention of both employee and managerial pay says the exact opposite: "Overall, BART's average employee -- executives included made nearly $30,000 more than employees at Los Angeles' transit line". One reason for the disproportionate wages was the BART systems unique and antiquated system which requires specially made parts and the knowledge to install them properly. Maybe Los Angeles has a lazy union?
Few of the workers are maintenance workers, and many of those just push a broom. Increasing wages because of "the local high cost of living" is what drives "the local high cost of living". If you choose to live in an area because of the weather, or local political climate, or whatever, doesn't imply that you should get paid more. Even using your figures, the pay and benefits are fair. But fairness isn't a factor when you can hold the public hostage and shut down the city.
 
Few of the workers are maintenance workers, and many of those just push a broom. Increasing wages because of "the local high cost of living" is what drives "the local high cost of living". If you choose to live in an area because of the weather, or local political climate, or whatever, doesn't imply that you should get paid more. Even using your figures, the pay and benefits are fair. But fairness isn't a factor when you can hold the public hostage and shut down the city.

BART's highest paid janitor brings home $82,000 a year for pushing that broom.
 
BART's highest paid janitor brings home $82,000 a year for pushing that broom.
I saw CNC machinist's jobs listed in San Diego at $26.00 an hour. That's $54,000 a year in an area that may compare with SF??? $82,000 a year is way too much for a job that requires no skill. There's a forklift driver at GM who makes over $200,000 a year, including overtime. If he's not dead. He was in his 70's. Donates his entire check to some college. Gets to draw SS. Pays not 1 cent in income tax.
 
yes, yes...

the problem here is a bunch of hard-working americans are taking home good pay for honest work.

we can't have that... no no nooo... that's a big problem.... we need to cut their pay and obliterate their benefits... no better way to improve a cities economy than by taking away a couple thousand workers' steady, reliable, honest, well-paying work... makes sense...
 
yes, yes...

the problem here is a bunch of hard-working americans are taking home good pay for honest work.

we can't have that... no no nooo... that's a big problem.... we need to cut their pay and obliterate their benefits... no better way to improve a cities economy than by taking away a couple thousand workers' steady, reliable, honest, well-paying work... makes sense...

We really need to do away with minimum wage and let the free market decide our worth.
 
yes, yes...

the problem here is a bunch of hard-working americans are taking home good pay for honest work.

we can't have that... no no nooo... that's a big problem.... we need to cut their pay and obliterate their benefits... no better way to improve a cities economy than by taking away a couple thousand workers' steady, reliable, honest, well-paying work... makes sense...

Alas, money doesn't magically appear. Where is that good living that you speak of coming from? The 400,000 people who use BART every single day. Why should 400,000 people have to pay inflated transit prices so that 2,000 unionized workers can enjoy substantially above market livings for their skills? Why should 400,000 people have their transit system held hostage by a greedy union that won't accept any answer other than "Substantially more!"

In this case, the union rejected a raise of 3% a year for the next 4 years. That janitor I mentioned is going to jump from $82,000 a year to $92,000 a year, but evidently that just wasn't enough.
 
Back
Top