But he could have. He also had no obligation to attack Zimmerman.
there is zero evidence that martin attacked zimmerman.*
martin ran, zimmerman followed. that suggests self defense, not attack.
you sound like nontheist now. dumb as fuck.
I was saying that is how it could have went down if Martin didn't attack him and there was an ounce of human decency in his body.
again, you ASSUME that martin, who ran, attacked zimmerman, who followed that punk asshole who was always getting away.
ya know, zimmerman: the guy with the long history of violence and getting too involved.
you have no evidence of who attacked who, yet you assume it was the little black kid who ran away from the bigger grown man who followed. that makes less than zero sense. that assumption only makes sense if you assign blame based on skin color rather than size and mindset.*
Yea, that was said. It was also said by the non emergency operator that he didn't feel that it was any cause for concern nor did it arise his "spidysense" that he meant it in an ill manner. (This was from your prosecutions side and their own witness, which also worked in Zimmermans favor may I add.)
i almost feel certain that "fucking punks" and "these assholes always get away" will work in zimm's favor
my other suspicion is that these remarks show his ill will, especially compared to his earlier, calmer calls.
zimm was pissed that night, and was on a lot of drugs that cause those symptoms.
Go on and scan to the 5:00 min mark and there is your proof that it was cause by blunt force trauma.
admit it to evidence then.
the only evidence we have in this case shows a tiny scratch with no bruise or blunt force trauma. a 2 cm scratch.
i've cut myself worse while trimming. no broken nose either, according to zimm's own doctor.
This is just ludicrous. How are you even coming up with this nonsense?
i didn't say it, zimmerman did. zimm said that he was able to exercise full wrist control on martin while at his alleged worst.*
the fact that you doubt this is an illustration of what an uninformed, ignorant asshole you are.
ABORT your attempts here. you are ill informed and exposing your racist sentiments.
There is no evidence that supports that Zimmerman attacked Martin first
there is no evidence for the opposite, either. yet you ASSUME that is what happened.
that assumption runs contrary to the evidence of martin running and zimmerman following, to boot.
that assumption is a racist assumption. there is no other way to explain that assumption.
i will provide evidence of your racist assumption by citing the rest of what you say, all race based nonsense:
and that is what would need to be proven, and just because he called about suspicious black males doesn't prove ill will, nor does it show that it was racially motivated, simply because there is proof that the burglaries happened by no other than suspicious black males. Even the woman who is black might I add, said that Zimmerman seemed "meek" to her, and he was always respectful and offered him a position with the citizen police to which Zimmerman declined. Another witness for the prosecution that spoke highly of Zimmerman.
no one but you and the known racist desert dude are trying to bring race into this.
the fact here is that a grown man with a gun (who was acting agitated) followed an innocent kid who was running away. as neighborhood watch captain and a gun owner, zimm had a greater responsibility to not act so fucking creepy. his creepy actions ended up with him killing an innocent child based on injuries so minor that zimm himself laughed them off.
then zimm told multiple competing versions to the police, and almost all of those versions are demonstrable lies. why lie if you're innocent?
no one but you and fellow racist desert dude bring race into this. thanks for exposing to us why you care about this.