Zimbabwe has $217 in the bank. No, I didn't miss any zeros.

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
You say they killed the original owners and stole their land. Any evidence at all of that or are you spewing racist hate speech?
In the 1880s, the British arrived with Cecil Rhodes's British South Africa Company. In 1898, the name Southern Rhodesia was adopted.[SUP][19][/SUP] In 1888, British colonialist Cecil Rhodes obtained a concession for mining rights from King Lobengula of the Ndebele peoples.[SUP][20][/SUP] Cecil Rhodes presented this concession to persuade the government of the United Kingdom to grant a royal charter to his British South Africa Company (BSAC) over Matabeleland, and its subject states such as Mashonaland. Rhodes sought permission to negotiate similar concessions covering all territory between the Limpopo River and Lake Tanganyika, then known as 'Zambesia'. In accordance with the terms of aforementioned concessions and treaties,[SUP][21][/SUP] Cecil Rhodes promoted the colonisation of the region's land, with British control over labour as well as precious metals and other mineral resources.[SUP][22][/SUP] In 1895 the BSAC adopted the name 'Rhodesia' for the territory of Zambesia, in honour of Cecil Rhodes. In 1898 'Southern Rhodesia' became the official denotation for the region south of the Zambezi,[SUP][23][/SUP] which later became Zimbabwe. The region to the north was administered separately by the BSAC and later named Northern Rhodesia (now Zambia).
The Shona staged unsuccessful revolts (known as Chimurenga) against encroachment upon their lands, by clients of BSAC and Cecil Rhodes in 1896 and 1897.[SUP][24][/SUP] Following the failed insurrections of 1896–97 the Ndebele and Shona groups became subject to Rhodes's administration thus precipitating European settlement en masse which led to land distribution disproportionately favouring Europeans, displacing the Shona, Ndebele, and other indigenous peoples.
Southern Rhodesia became a self-governing British colony in October 1923, subsequent to a 1922 referendum. Rhodesians served on behalf of the United Kingdom during World War II, mainly in the East African Campaign against Axis forces in Italian East Africa.
In 1953, in the face of African opposition,[SUP][25][/SUP] Britain consolidated the two colonies of Rhodesia with Nyasaland (now Malawi) in the ill-fated Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland which was dominated by Southern Rhodesia. Growing African nationalism and general dissent, particularly in Nyasaland, persuaded Britain to dissolve the Union in 1963, forming three colonies. As colonial rule was ending throughout the continent and as African-majority governments assumed control in neighbouring Northern Rhodesia and in Nyasaland, the white-minority Rhodesia government led by Ian Smith made a Unilateral Declaration of Independence (UDI) from the United Kingdom on 11 November 1965, effectively repudiating the British plan that the country should become a multi-racial democracy. The United Kingdom deemed this an act of rebellion, but did not re-establish control by force. The white-minority government declared itself a "republic" in 1970. A civil war ensued, with Joshua Nkomo's ZAPU and Robert Mugabe's ZANU using assistance from the governments of Zambia and Mozambique. Although Smith's declaration was not recognised by the United Kingdom nor any other significant power, Southern Rhodesia dropped the designation 'Southern', and claimed nation status as the Republic of Rhodesia in 1970.[SUP][26][/SUP][SUP][27][/SUP]
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
it's no surprise that he would try to come to the rescue here for WhiterWoman and try to really drive home the point that success in farming is melanin-dependent.
I never said any of that. Poor Buck, his only friends are straw men.
 

Figong

Well-Known Member
it's no surprise that he would try to come to the rescue here for WhiterWoman and try to really drive home the point that success in farming is melanin-dependent.
melanin, or using a Raven Sidekick to add n-serve to their NH3 applications.. can't forget that...

As for caps.. a1566_thumb.jpg
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
so you weren't trying to deny the existence of recorded history?
What "recorded history"? You were just running your mouth without any knowledge about it at all. You still haven't been able to cite any evidence. Just "history books", that you somehow are unable identify.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
As I said "What "recorded history"?" You presented no history, just your usual hate speech.
yep, cheesus and i reciting recorded history is hate speech, you pretending that it doesn't exist is noble.

in your mind, stormfront red.
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
Yet, you still are totally unable to cite any of it. But you did claim Cheezy's work as your own. So you're still just a liar.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Yet, you still are totally unable to cite any of it. But you did claim Cheezy's work as your own. So you're still just a liar.
i could have just referred you to the google box, but it's more fun watching you flop around like a fish out of water.
 

SnakeByte

Active Member
LMAO. I just knew that when they kicked out the White farmers and the White engineers and professionasl this would happen.

There are cash-strapped governments, and there are broke governments. And then there's Zimbabwe, which, after paying last week's government salaries, has just $217 in the bank. No, we didn't forget any zeroes to the end of that figure. Zimbabwe, the country that's home to some of the world's largest plutonium and diamond reserves, is literally as rich as a 14-year-old girl after a really good birthday party. The country's finance minister admitted as much in a press conference on Tuesday. "Last week when we paid civil servants there was $217
in government coffers," Tendai Biti told reporters. "The government finances are in paralysis state at the present moment. We are failing to meet our targets."​


Um, Well... If they don't have debts... (which I do not know) It might actually make them the richest country.... no?​
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
And they all lived in peace and harmony... the end... LOL!

Fucking fairy tale...
Actually, the way the story went was: and the white guys showed up and took possession of the resources, turned them into commodities to sell and forced the indigenous people to accept Jesus as lord and savior and enslaved them in mines and on farms then left them to fight over who lead the nation but continued to benefit from the cheap resources being mined there.

Yes, farms with slaves are quite productive.
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
Actually, the way the story went was; and the white guys showed up and took possession of the resources, turned them into commodities to sell and forced the indigenous people to accept Jesus as lord and savior and enslaved them in mines and on farms then left them to fight over who lead the nation but continued to benefit from the cheap resources being mined there.

Yes, farms with slaves are quite productive.
And when the righteous government kicked the white guys out by confiscating the land back the people starved...

And they lived happily... er... well, they died so... no ever after....

Tell me another fucking fairy tale!!
 
Top