beardo
Well-Known Member
use your words.
Do you think Thomas Kelly should have had a firearm?
use your words.
it's simple. just find something in writing with citations that shows that 4 or 5 different news sources are all wrong and that he didn't bring an XM15 bushmaster with him.
i've told those fucks at the league office a million times i don't watch silly stupid videos. use your words.
The news media outlets call the AR15's and other assault rifles an assault weapon(s). That's a political term that was created in 1989. You quote news as fact yet they blatantly lie continually. Which outlet do you work for? Aside from your obvious trolling you must work for one of them to continually spew out lies. MSNBC? How much do you make?
oh, so you're just choosing to not call a bushmaster XM15 an assault rifle now?
did he or did he not go in there with his bushmaster XM15 assault rifle? yes or no?
I see U.B. is afraid to answer the real questions, and doesn't want to participate in the actual debate.
You just noticed that?
Do you think Oscar Grant could have benefited from having one?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BART_Police_shooting_of_Oscar_Grant
Is that what you're referring to? If so, I have no idea I don't know anything about the situation I'd have to read up on it.
mr2shims is correct, the term assault weapons was created in 1989 by the anti gun lobby. There are many semi automatic weapons on the market. But they go after the ar-15 and ak-47 because of cosmetics. A true assualt weapon would be the fully automatic weapons that our military carry, which are banned. In 2011 there were 8583 gun murders,of those 323 by rifles, and of those 48 were by so called assault style rifles. That is 0.6%. By contrast there were 496 murders by hammers and 1,694 by knives. Then the lefts argument will be magazine size. In 1999 Eric Harris walked in to Columbine High School armed with a Hi-Point 995 and 13- 10 round magazines. He got of 96 rounds before he shot himself... so that argument is not valid as well.
mr2shims is correct, the term assault weapons was created in 1989 by the anti gun lobby. There are many semi automatic weapons on the market. But they go after the ar-15 and ak-47 because of cosmetics. A true assualt weapon would be the fully automatic weapons that our military carry, which are banned. In 2011 there were 8583 gun murders,of those 323 by rifles, and of those 48 were by so called assault style rifles. That is 0.6%. By contrast there were 496 murders by hammers and 1,694 by knives. Then the lefts argument will be magazine size. In 1999 Eric Harris walked in to Columbine High School armed with a Hi-Point 995 and 13- 10 round magazines. He got of 96 rounds before he shot himself... so that argument is not valid as well.
[youtube]8Tmh9B8LVxM[/youtube]
You can watch the Thomas Kelly one if you want, it's on their also, that ones Really Fucked Up, Heres Oscar Grant getting murdered.
Assault rifles are rifles specifically engineered to kill people
You are not doing us gun owners any favors by trying to muddy the waters with bullshit
I see U.B. is afraid to answer the real questions, and doesn't want to participate in the actual debate.
But yes it's an assault rifle...
ok then.
so why does a civilian need a military style weapon?
are you self defending yourself from 30 armed men on the regular or something?
shakespeare invented words too. don't see anyone giving him shit for that.
Are you in serious conversation mode? Oh boy I'm excited now.
What makes it a military style weapon?
Would Travian Martain been better off had he had a gun?
How did being unarmed work out for him?
Are you in serious conversation mode? Oh boy I'm excited now.
What makes it a military style weapon?