Ron Paul's farewell speech, part 1

[Carne Seca]

Oh God.. here we go again... IT DIDN'T HAPPEN BECAUSE I SAY IT DIDN'T HAPPEN!!!

 

[UncleBuck]

So do you not know how to read or...? Because he QUOTED someone else's racist statement -- he did NOT make that as his own. It was claimed to have been said by Andy Rooney, not Ron Paul. Now the article does have some homophobic sentiments. There's no ron paul tagline so I can't tell if he wrote that and I can't really take your word for it since you're an unreliable source based on what you just said and your other posts. Show me the source where he says HE wrote that and i'll acknowledge he made a homophobic statement.

half a dozen newspapers covered his 1996 congressional campaign where ron paul and his aides defended those newsletters as his own writings. here is a link to the houston chronicle's article on it.

http://www.chron.com/CDA/archives/archive.mpl?id=1996_1343749

you want homophobic? rawn pawl has it in spades. see HR7955:

Prohibits the expenditure of Federal funds to any organization which presents male or female homosexuality as an acceptable alternative life style or which suggest that it can be an acceptable life style.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d096:HR07955:@@@L&summ2=m&

i know rawn pawl better than his stupid little fanboys do. and i have much more racist newsletters from him for you to read over if you wish. he started publishing them when he was in debt back in the day and realized that racism sells. that's how he made a good deal of his money, before he moved on to congressional insider trading.

 

[UncleBuck]

Oh God.. here we go again... IT DIDN'T HAPPEN BECAUSE I SAY IT DIDN'T HAPPEN!!!

it's all good. i have rawn pawl on tape referring hannity to an article where he all but admitted that to defending those newsletters.

i save it as the trump card after the rawn pawl fanboys deny reality enough.

 

[beardo]

it's all good. i have rawn pawl on tape referring hannity to an article where he all but admitted that to defending those newsletters.

i save it as the trump card after the rawn pawl fanboys deny reality enough.

I would vote for a Paul /Duke ticket in 2016 and relish in the freedom and logic of their administration and how our nation would prosper under their leadership.

 

[UncleBuck]

david duke:

 

[cannabineer]

fixed it, because rawn pawl capitulated to the will of the american people and retired his roundly rejected racist behind back to texas, where racist wingnuts go to retire in peace.

Such vowel play. cn

 

[Senseimilla]

You're funny unclefuck... but your candidate basically believes in fascistic socialism, so the only nazi here is you. Ron Paul is the opposite of the nazi. Nazis believe in controlling people's lives like you do -- Ron Paul does not. Take your tripe and sling it to anyone who'll believe that crap. Even if Ron Paul is the worst homophobic racist on earth, it really doesn't matter to me -- it's his message people believe in, not so much Ron Paul. You can sling whatever kind of shit you want, but the truth is you are the one who believes in government control (or at least your party does, so by proxy you do). The people who support Ron Paul just want to be left the fuck alone by the government to live in peace -- have fun being on the side of the fascists who want to take our rights.

 

[UncleBuck]

You're funny unclefuck... but your candidate basically believes in fascistic socialism, so the only nazi here is you. Ron Paul is the opposite of the nazi. Nazis believe in controlling people's lives like you do -- Ron Paul does not. Take your tripe and sling it to anyone who'll believe that crap. Even if Ron Paul is the worst homophobic racist on earth, it really doesn't matter to me -- it's his message people believe in, not so much Ron Paul. You can sling whatever kind of shit you want, but the truth is you are the one who believes in government control (or at least your party does, so by proxy you do). The people who support Ron Paul just want to be left the fuck alone by the government to live in peace -- have fun being on the side of the fascists who want to take our rights.

lol.

rawn pawl's america is one where rights are reduced for many.

apparently, you rawn pawl wingnuts have never heard of the 14th amendment.

 

[Mr Neutron]

Some people just don't understand things like taking responsibility for something, even though they had nothing to do with it, rather than throw someone else under the bus, to save their own hide.
But then, you can't expect 9 year old kids to understand grown up things, like that.
If any of the slander that has been thrown at Dr Paul were true, there would be at least a few people to substantiate it but instead, there are tons of people who testify to the opposite.

 

[UncleBuck]

Some people just don't understand things like taking responsibility for something, even though they had nothing to do with it, rather than throw someone else under the bus, to save their own hide.
But then, you can't expect 9 year old kids to understand grown up things, like that.
If any of the slander that has been thrown at Dr Paul were true, there would be at least a few people to substantiate it but instead, there are tons of people who testify to the opposite.

rawn pawl has testified to the opposite of rawn pawl

better change your sig picture, the new rep from tx-14 likes to crack down on those hookers you enjoy so much.

 

[Senseimilla]

Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

I submit to you that the current president is the one who supports depriving US citizens of liberty AND property (notice property is included in this amendment, something this president DEFINITELY does not believe). Ron Paul supports EVERY aspect of the 14th amendment. Your president and the republican nominee are the ones who selectively choose which aspects of the constitution they would choose to enforce. They do not believe in liberty in either party. They only believe you have the liberties they deign to grant you out of their kindness.

You say you don't like Ron Paul and you're entitled to your opinion -- it's a non issue now as he's retiring. But his message remains and whatever you say about him doesn't change the fact that you're on the side AGAINST liberty.

lol.

rawn pawl's america is one where rights are reduced for many.

apparently, you rawn pawl wingnuts have never heard of the 14th amendment.

 

[UncleBuck]

Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

I submit to you that the current president is the one who supports depriving US citizens of liberty AND property (notice property is included in this amendment, something this president DEFINITELY does not believe). Ron Paul supports EVERY aspect of the 14th amendment. Your president and the republican nominee are the ones who selectively choose which aspects of the constitution they would choose to enforce. They do not believe in liberty in either party. They only believe you have the liberties they deign to grant you out of their kindness.

You say you don't like Ron Paul and you're entitled to your opinion -- it's a non issue now as he's retiring. But his message remains and whatever you say about him doesn't change the fact that you're on the side AGAINST liberty.

if rawn pawl is for equal protection of the law, why does he favor giving special rights to racist business owners? you have any idea what the green book for negro travelers is? it would still exist in rawn pawl's america.

if rawn pawl is for equal protection of the law, why does he favor giving federal money to entities which suggest heterosexuality is acceptable but opposes giving federal money to entities that suggest homosexuality is acceptable?

rawn pawl is an old racist coot who tricked and duped fools into giving him money bombs, which he then gave to his campaign "staff", aka his own damn family.

he knew he had no chance of winning but he told you he could and took your money anyway to make his family richer at your expense.

i just LOL.

 

[Senseimilla]

you're entitled to your opinion even if it's based on completely made up shit. i did not give any money to ron paul once again you don't know anything. you're still on the side of the nazis and ron paul's backers are on the side of liberty. we can keep repeating this back and forth... i know you always need to have the last word. me - for freedom. you - not. i don't seek to glorify one person (obama, ron paul, etc) - i'm about liberty. You're for oppression. I notice you rag on ron paul in response, but you NEVER deny so far when I state you are on the side of oppression -- because it's true and you know it. You want to impose your liberal morality on others the same way ultra conservative rightists do. Enjoy being in THAT company.

PS whenever I read your posts from now on I'm now going to imagine them in the voice of Bane from dark knight rises.

 

[Mr Neutron]

you're entitled to your opinion even if it's based on completely made up shit. i did not give any money to ron paul once again you don't know anything. you're still on the side of the nazis and ron paul's backers are on the side of liberty. we can keep repeating this back and forth... i know you always need to have the last word. me - for freedom. you - not. i don't seek to glorify one person (obama, ron paul, etc) - i'm about liberty. You're for oppression. I notice you rag on ron paul in response, but you NEVER deny so far when I state you are on the side of oppression -- because it's true and you know it. You want to impose your liberal morality on others the same way ultra conservative rightists do. Enjoy being in THAT company.

PS whenever I read your posts from now on I'm now going to imagine them in the voice of Bane from dark knight rises.

Don't even bother engaging the trolls. It does NO good and only encourages them. You can't have an adult debate with children. They never give any substantive answers to questions but instead would rather repeat lies about a true American hero.

 

[Senseimilla]

Oh I know there's no point in talking to unclebuck and co.. i know their friends... just having a little fun and election venting... when i've had my jollies i'll stop playing with him. sometime's it's fun to poke the troll with the stick and watch it be entirely predictable.

It's fun to play the troll card sometimes... i didn't ask for them to join the thread, but if they are...

 

[UncleBuck]

you're entitled to your opinion even if it's based on completely made up shit. i did not give any money to ron paul once again you don't know anything. you're still on the side of the nazis and ron paul's backers are on the side of liberty. we can keep repeating this back and forth... i know you always need to have the last word. me - for freedom. you - not. i don't seek to glorify one person (obama, ron paul, etc) - i'm about liberty. You're for oppression. I notice you rag on ron paul in response, but you NEVER deny so far when I state you are on the side of oppression -- because it's true and you know it. You want to impose your liberal morality on others the same way ultra conservative rightists do. Enjoy being in THAT company.

PS whenever I read your posts from now on I'm now going to imagine them in the voice of Bane from dark knight rises.

lol.

ron paul ron paul liberty constitution ron paul. i have won the argument.

is it any wonder he did so shitty with supporters like you?

Don't even bother engaging the trolls. It does NO good and only encourages them. You can't have an adult debate with children. They never give any substantive answers to questions but instead would rather repeat lies about a true American hero.

lol once again.

just because you sucked his dick does not make him an american hero.

do you suppose if i publish some kooky, racist newsletters and lie about them that i can be a true american hero as well?

 

[Senseimilla]

Most of the country are not interested in liberty -- unfortunately it's a hard sell as most fools like you have been indoctrinated to wanting a socialist state where big brother tells you how to live your life. Just like marijuana legalization, most of the country is completely uninterested as long as the freedom taken away does not affect them. People like you create a government that enables the government to throw us in jail for this. You're part of the problem. Like I said no matter what you think of Ron Paul he's a non issue now it's over.

 

[UncleBuck]

Most of the country are not interested in liberty -- unfortunately it's a hard sell as most fools like you have been indoctrinated to wanting a socialist state where big brother tells you how to live your life. Just like marijuana legalization, most of the country is completely uninterested as long as the freedom taken away does not affect them. People like you create a government that enables the government to throw us in jail for this. You're part of the problem. Like I said no matter what you think of Ron Paul he's a non issue now it's over.

rawn pawl was always a non-issue.

rawn pawl's vision would have taken liberty away from those who fought the hardest for it. it would have stalled freedom for those working hard towards it as we speak.

the dude is a joke and a sham, and you bought it.

 

[OGEvilgenius]

if rawn pawl is for equal protection of the law, why does he favor giving special rights to racist business owners? you have any idea what the green book for negro travelers is? it would still exist in rawn pawl's america.

Actually, he'd give the same rights to all business owners. Please though, illustrate what special rights he would be giving them.

if rawn pawl is for equal protection of the law, why does he favor giving federal money to entities which suggest heterosexuality is acceptable but opposes giving federal money to entities that suggest homosexuality is acceptable?

Obviously you are going to have to clarify.

rawn pawl is an old racist coot who tricked and duped fools into giving him money bombs, which he then gave to his campaign "staff", aka his own damn family.

Most of his staff certainly was not composed of his family. They spent all their money campaigning. If you have evidence to the contrary, feel free to offer it.

he knew he had no chance of winning but he told you he could and took your money anyway to make his family richer at your expense.

i just LOL.

You'll have to illustrate how this happened because none of your accusations appear to have any kind of truth to them. He had a very good shot at winning - assuming the game wasn't rigged. There's a long list of instances where he was screwed over and defrauded. It was obvious in Massachusettes that vote flipping was engaged for example. Statistically it's almost a certainty.

But that's neither here nor there. The message is really bigger than Ron Paul is. And I suspect he'd rather keep it that way.

Even states where Romney won huge, wherever he'd go, it was like a grave yard. Wherever Ron Paul went it was overflowing with people. Nothing about the results really add up.

 

[UncleBuck]

Actually, he'd give the same rights to all business owners. Please though, illustrate what special rights he would be giving them.

he'd give special rights to business owners, especially the racist ones.

your right to swing your fist ends at my face. that is how rights work. rawn pawl wants to return to a time where the rights of the business owner were allowed to cause harm to others.

civil rights, ma'am.

Obviously you are going to have to clarify.

HR7955, sistah.

Most of his staff certainly was not composed of his family. They spent all their money campaigning. If you have evidence to the contrary, feel free to offer it.



You'll have to illustrate how this happened because none of your accusations appear to have any kind of truth to them. He had a very good shot at winning - assuming the game wasn't rigged. There's a long list of instances where he was screwed over and defrauded. It was obvious in Massachusettes that vote flipping was engaged for example. Statistically it's almost a certainty.

But that's neither here nor there. The message is really bigger than Ron Paul is. And I suspect he'd rather keep it that way.

Even states where Romney won huge, wherever he'd go, it was like a grave yard. Wherever Ron Paul went it was overflowing with people. Nothing about the results really add up.

lol.

http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/wa...ers-lining-family-pockets-with-political-cash

strike three, sweetheart.