Romney knows who's responsible for this mess

I actually received and receive benefits from installing solar panels to heat the water for two of my facilities...some people just hate Obama so much it has blinded them and made them rather stupid..poor stupid hateful blind people.

Was the check signed by Obama?
 
by which ones are still in business.

obama's DOE: 83% success.

bain: 78% success.

DOE dumps billions of dollars into green energy programs... So what? Did that save the companies or just allow them to continue for months or years AKA solyndra....

Bain turned companies around and made them profitable.

Show me just 2 companies that the DOE has made profitable...
 
You should learn how to read before you post. If you're going to respond to my posts before reading them, then its clear you're an idiot. Paul Ryan isn't running for president. People normally don't vote for a vice president. They vote for a president. Show me where Romney voted for the bank bail outs. Thats right, he didn't It was Obama that labeled the 5 major banks in this country as " too big to fail". That was Obama that gave Goldmann-Sachs executives million dollar bonuses. Not Romney.
Oil does not get 4 billion dollars in subsidies. Are you confusing it with Obama giving green energy 90 billion in subsidies? Because all that money Obama flushed down the toilet, while paying off his donors and campaign bundlers like Solyndra, while creating jobs in Finland. Obama has created a lot of jobs for other countries overseas. But last I checked, hes supposed to be the president of AMERICA.

hey kiddo, did you forget that romney said he would sign ryan's budget? :dunce:

and yes, oil does get $4 billion in corporate welfare.

and the $90 billion obama's DOE invested in sustainable energy? better success rate than bain capital.

go cry elsewhere, vagina flap.

written in crayon to abet understanding.
 
yet he refuses to name those deductions.

there are plenty of clips where romney says he will cut taxes 20% across the board, dipshit. trying to divorce the cuts from how he will pay for them is not how we talk about taxes.

and remind me, what deductions and loopholes would he cut? be specific! :lol:

Do you want a president who lays out a plan and then tries to get bipartisan support to make it happen or do you want a president that gives congress a bill and says here, pass it exactly as it is?

How is Obama going to cut the debt, balance the budget, increase education funding, invest in green energy and strengthen the middle class by raising income tax on the "rich" generating only 70B a year?
 
PBS just told Obama to take down his new political ad. They said its "shallow" and they refuse the president throw them around like a political football. Basically, Big Bird just told Obama to "shut the fuck up" :lol:
 
Do you want a president who lays out a plan and then tries to get bipartisan support to make it happen or do you want a president that gives congress a bill and says here, pass it exactly as it is?

How is Obama going to cut the debt, balance the budget, increase education funding, invest in green energy and strengthen the middle class by raising income tax on the "rich" generating only 70B a year?

a better question would be 'how does romney plan to do those things while pissing away $7 trillion in tax cuts and increased military spending?' :lol:
 
Also, if anyone cares, the man who made the study that Obama used to claim Romney will raise taxes on the middle class has said Obama is fos and misrepresenting his study.

I can’t tell exactly how the Obama campaign reached that characterization of my work. It might be that they assume that Governor Romney wants to keep the taxes from the Affordable Care Act in place, despite the fact that the Governor has called for its complete repeal. The main conclusion of my study is that under plausible assumptions, a proposal along the lines suggested by Governor Romney can both be revenue neutral and keep the net tax burden on taxpayers with incomes above $200,000 about the same. That is, an increase in the tax burden on lower and middle income individuals is not required in order to make the overall plan revenue neutral.
 
Also, if anyone cares, the man who made the study that Obama used to claim Romney will raise taxes on the middle class has said Obama is fos and misrepresenting his study.

I can’t tell exactly how the Obama campaign reached that characterization of my work. It might be that they assume that Governor Romney wants to keep the taxes from the Affordable Care Act in place, despite the fact that the Governor has called for its complete repeal. The main conclusion of my study is that under plausible assumptions, a proposal along the lines suggested by Governor Romney can both be revenue neutral and keep the net tax burden on taxpayers with incomes above $200,000 about the same. That is, an increase in the tax burden on lower and middle income individuals is not required in order to make the overall plan revenue neutral.

you know what is required to keep his "eat cake, lose weight" plan revenue neutral? unrealistic growth projections that you omitted.

hiding something?
 
a better question would be 'how does romney plan to do those things while pissing away $7 trillion in tax cuts and increased military spending?' :lol:

If you believe cutting taxes, simplifying the tax code and removing archaic restrictions to prosperity will actually grow the economy it's self evident. If you don't understand how this is possible then you are a liberal. The bus driver has your helmet if you were looking for it.

Where does that figure of 5T in tax cuts come from? You know the princeton guy that Obama was sighting has already said Obama was lying about Romney lying. A Princeton guy too, that's good stuff.
 
you know what is required to keep his "eat cake, lose weight" plan revenue neutral? unrealistic growth projections that you omitted.

hiding something?

are they more or less realistic than the 4% growth Obama planned on to get to the 4million jobs created or saved? A number you continue to repeat while even Obama himself has stopped claiming this.
 
and the little retard breaks out the crayons.

He still couldn't resist lying about it.

"Sesame Workshop is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization and we do not endorse candidates or participate in political campaigns," the group said. "We have approved no campaign ads, and as is our general practice, have requested that the ad be taken down."
 
It kind of cracks me up how shutting down PBS was one of the few "details" Romney was willing to offer up. Like it's some brilliant grand scheme, when in reality it's less than these two assholes will end up spending on their campaigns.

Anyways, PBS is the shit. With TV turning to shit so quickly it's good to have around.
 
It kind of cracks me up how shutting down PBS was one of the few "details" Romney was willing to offer up. Like it's some brilliant grand scheme, when in reality it's less than these two assholes will end up spending on their campaigns.

Anyways, PBS is the shit. With TV turning to shit so quickly it's good to have around.

He was talking to a PBS commentator who asked this question. If it were someone from planned parenthood he would have mentioned that, if it were someone from ACORN he would have mentioned that, if it had been someone from Solyndra he would have mentioned that. It wasn't his best moment but for realz man, what is Obama's plan, we need details please.
 
It kind of cracks me up how shutting down PBS was one of the few "details" Romney was willing to offer up. Like it's some brilliant grand scheme, when in reality it's less than these two assholes will end up spending on their campaigns.

Anyways, PBS is the shit. With TV turning to shit so quickly it's good to have around.

Its not about the money. They are convinced that PBS is a socialist indoctrination organization out to corrupt our children. Think of the Children! They did this with Prop. H8te in California and most cannabis legalization efforts. They can't find a way to make a profit off it (since it's a non-profit organization) so they're going to destroy it.
 
If you believe cutting taxes, simplifying the tax code and removing archaic restrictions to prosperity will actually grow the economy it's self evident. If you don't understand how this is possible then you are a liberal. The bus driver has your helmet if you were looking for it.

Where does that figure of 5T in tax cuts come from? You know the princeton guy that Obama was sighting has already said Obama was lying about Romney lying. A Princeton guy too, that's good stuff.

$5 trillion comes from cutting taxes 20% across the board.

now maybe you can be the one to tell me which deductions will be trashed to pay for those $5 trillion in cuts. be specific.
 
He was talking to a PBS commentator who asked this question. If it were someone from planned parenthood he would have mentioned that, if it were someone from ACORN he would have mentioned that, if it had been someone from Solyndra he would have mentioned that. It wasn't his best moment but for realz man, what is Obama's plan, we need details please.

But it is about the money. That was the topic, $$$.
 
are they more or less realistic than the 4% growth Obama planned on to get to the 4million jobs created or saved? A number you continue to repeat while even Obama himself has stopped claiming this.

so nothing to say about the unrealistic growth projections you are relying on? just an indictment that the recession was worese than we thought?

watching you righties defend romney is like watching a dog chase its tail.
 
Back
Top