Jon Stewart sums up Fast and Furious

lol you should look into where international law is being used; your example fails horribly because that's a domestic issue, not an international...and it's not regarding invading other countries.



He wasn't the first, and won't be the last; so why are you choosing to make HIM the big deal NOW?

This is one of the most idiotic statements on this subject, I hope you're not eligible to vote!
 
Not so much the dead agent, but the apparent cover up. I can not think of any president who would not have green lighted the killing of OBL, even Jimmy Carter would have done so. Obama has taken an active role in the apparent cover up, but merely watched the killing of OBL on closed circuit TV. The Watergate cover up was the Nixon scandal, not the actual burglary.

Think again, the strike was not a done deal. Clinton might not have given the goahead, Obama was advised that innocents might be killed and that Osama might not even have been there. Everyone seems to call this decision as far too easy when in reality, failure has all sorts of ramifications - up to an including an American population that would have crucified him had he failied - or don't you remember Carter?
 
Never takes them long to go to the ole "bbbb bbb but Bush did it too" BS.



Never JAH, I only bring those things up to see if you folks had a problem when bush did it? And most times, the "oh... they brought up Bush doing it too" crowd defended Bush's particular action while condemning Obama having done the same thing.
 
As I always say, Government attracts evil people to it like flys to shit because this is exactly what evil people are after, a monopoly of power in which they are not held accountable for their actions, this is what every evil person wants, goverment is so fitting for them. Transparent government, your fooling yourself, there never was such and there never will be such a thing.

No.


Bad government attracts evil people, good government does not. Government is no different than any other organization and to presume it is is to invite bad government and... bad people to govern.
 
Oh I am =D

And I vote for everything you are against.

It has noting to do with you voting democrat.
Your international law comment was a bunch of drivel, it made no sense what so ever.

But this comment of yours "He wasn't the first, and won't be the last; so why are you choosing to make HIM the big deal NOW? " was hilarious.

How in the hell would you know what and who I've made a big deal about, and would it make sense to make a "big deal" about something that happened years ago or something we are facing today? LOL

And last but not least, if we follow your train of thought, we don't make a big deal about any of them!
 
And last but not least, if we follow your train of thought, we don't make a big deal about any of them!

Alright; this is my last post because obviously this is just like a circle;

I was just antagonizing you with my last post; I vote for whatever I feel is right; could careless about the parties.

My international comment isn't a bunch of drivel; you brought up a domestic issue and tried to apply international law to it; sadly it doesn't work that way.

And my comment, the agent wasn't the first, and wasn't the last, so why make a big deal?

Are you campaigning to have all covert ops around the world stopped? If so, why don't you say that? There are hundreds of agents that die year round from covert ops that you never hear about; why aren't you campaigning for them? Why just one border patrol agent?

Oh because FoxNews made a huge issue out of it and have added some conspiracies that you've even announced and sound like you firmly believe.

Here's my advice; stop watching America made news. They aren't telling you any NEWS, Fox and MSNBC do nothing but stir the part against each other; who the hell knows what CNN is anymore (they are like a mix and it's sad watching it). Get your news from unbiased; non-influential sources (like BBC), that way instead of just retyping what FoxNews has said all throughout that day; you can come to your own UNBIASED conclusion.

But that's only if you care to be above all the partisan shit.

Next year it'll be a different issue that you are up in arms with.
 
It was idiotic when guns were allowed to walk under Bushney too. Slightly less idiotic because they at least tried to trace the guns and most importantly they involved the Mexican government. What somebody has done here was to arm the enemy of our neighbors without telling them and no way to track the guns. The plan was to hope they were used later in crimes so .. we .. could ... what exactly?

That's the point in the investigation. Then falsified documents were given to congress and all other documents redacted. After they had to retract a lie here and there the threats got louder that he would be held in contempt. Obama to the rescue, again, why?

Insight into the liberal we know better, if we beat them over the heads until they submit they'll see it attitude here.
[video=youtube;0nM0asnCXD0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0nM0asnCXD0&feature=player_embedded[/video]
 
It's a pair of Action Hero figurines who've brought down a Giant Squirrel with their artillery. I think it's one of the best avis on the site. :clap: cn
hehehe

2229515d1340748736-jon-stewart-sums-up-fast-untitled.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    34.8 KB · Views: 20
Alright; this is my last post because obviously this is just like a circle;

I was just antagonizing you with my last post; I vote for whatever I feel is right; could careless about the parties.

My international comment isn't a bunch of drivel; you brought up a domestic issue and tried to apply international law to it; sadly it doesn't work that way.

And my comment, the agent wasn't the first, and wasn't the last, so why make a big deal?

Are you campaigning to have all covert ops around the world stopped? If so, why don't you say that? There are hundreds of agents that die year round from covert ops that you never hear about; why aren't you campaigning for them? Why just one border patrol agent?

Oh because FoxNews made a huge issue out of it and have added some conspiracies that you've even announced and sound like you firmly believe.

Here's my advice; stop watching America made news. They aren't telling you any NEWS, Fox and MSNBC do nothing but stir the part against each other; who the hell knows what CNN is anymore (they are like a mix and it's sad watching it). Get your news from unbiased; non-influential sources (like BBC), that way instead of just retyping what FoxNews has said all throughout that day; you can come to your own UNBIASED conclusion.

But that's only if you care to be above all the partisan shit.

Next year it'll be a different issue that you are up in arms with.
You are correct that you have been trapped in a circle of Ron's Flock. They refuse to go outside the flock for any information and like to use the Bully tactic when trumping their propaganda.
 
Alright; this is my last post because obviously this is just like a circle;

I was just antagonizing you with my last post; I vote for whatever I feel is right; could careless about the parties.

My international comment isn't a bunch of drivel; you brought up a domestic issue and tried to apply international law to it; sadly it doesn't work that way. I sure as hell didn't bring it up, my comment on international law was a rhetorical response to another poster that brought it up.

And my comment, the agent wasn't the first, and wasn't the last, so why make a big deal?

Are you campaigning to have all covert ops around the world stopped? If so, why don't you say that? There are hundreds of agents that die year round from covert ops that you never hear about; why aren't you campaigning for them? Why just one border patrol agent? The agent in question was not involved in a covert opp my friend, he was a border patrol officer, not CIA.

Oh because FoxNews made a huge issue out of it and have added some conspiracies that you've even announced and sound like you firmly believe. Hey, until you can show some valid proof that Fox News purposely report false stories more than any other news source, I'll listen. The fact that liberals like yourself make that claim doesn't fly amigo.

When the day comes that I let other people dictate where and when I get my news sources, I guess I'll be a liberal.


Here's my advice; stop watching America made news. They aren't telling you any NEWS, Fox and MSNBC do nothing but stir the part against each other; who the hell knows what CNN is anymore (they are like a mix and it's sad watching it). Get your news from unbiased; non-influential sources (like BBC), that way instead of just retyping what FoxNews has said all throughout that day; you can come to your own UNBIASED conclusion.

But that's only if you care to be above all the partisan shit.

Next year it'll be a different issue that you are up in arms with.

Here's some advice for you, when I feel you or anyone else on this forum is more informed that myself, I'll take your advice.
 
Back
Top