eye exaggerate
Well-Known Member
...I'm saying that God is 'no-thing' and we are 'things'. No one can argue that we are not physical beings. If you're scientific then you know that the 'anti' to everything exists. This is the same principle.
Prove to you There's a God?
- Thread starter Marlboro47
- Start date
eye exaggerate
Well-Known Member
...if there is a physicality which is observable, then it follows that there would be a non-physicality which is not observable.
Beefbisquit
Well-Known Member
Not a person, but an actual thing....
If it can make changes in the physical world, it has to manifest itself in some way - if it's manifesting itself in the physical world, it has to be testable.
Heisenberg
Well-Known Member
What god is to you is your prerogative, but the sense of god you are describing is not the god that an atheist rejects. Some atheists arrive at the position out of anger and rebellion, others are pushed to anger by discrimination and having to live in a world where dogmatic certainty in god causes us hardship and at times outright oppression. In any case, it is not wrong to express my beliefs or criticisms of others beliefs. The goal of debate is to find common ground and to progress past dispute in search of higher ground, argument comes about when people don't observe standards of debate and logic, which causes everyone to waste time chasing their tale, in which case having feet nailed to the floor may be desirable.
eye exaggerate
Well-Known Member
...I'll go back to a post I made in another thread. Has science produced DNA yet from nothing? I don't mean cloning either. I mean, from scratch.
Beefbisquit
Well-Known Member
No, but many of the original complex proteins that were the first building blocks of life have been replicated in labs....
Keep in mind it took an entire planet of swirling gasses and liquids billions of years to make a single living organism.... how fast, in your opinion, should science be completing this endeavour?
eye exaggerate
Well-Known Member
Heisenberg, I agree that we are searching for common ground. I do not agree that running circles is bad. A straight line becomes a circle in time, it is inevitable.
Marlboro47
Well-Known Member
Women are automatically attractive to me, its just natural instinct.
Men remind me of myself, and I am not attracted to myself sexually.
Define what is in bold.
Whats underlined: What I ment is that I know alot of homos with bad experiences with women, which makes them homo(making them lazy to not try to find attractive qaulitys in women)...
In my mind men aren't attractive, in my mind they are disgusting. I think about myself and how many times I have to wash my hands, and use hand sanatizer and it fucking disgusts me when I use someone elses computer or laptop. I have to wash my hands before I stick my hands in my pocket or Ill need to disinfect my lighters, cellphone, id, ect.
I have to use alcohol on a paper towel on my xbox360 controllers and keyboard and mouse before and after I have any friends over otherwise Ill freak out when I want to smoke pot or eat.
eye exaggerate
Well-Known Member
...right, replicated
Beefbisquit
Well-Known Member
Has religion produced DNA yet from nothing? I don't mean a story in an old book, I mean proof that religion, or god created DNA....
eye exaggerate
Well-Known Member
...fast enough to not put down those that believe in a higher entity.
eye exaggerate
Well-Known Member
...no, but religion (as it is known) does not act so arrogantly as to assume it could.
Beefbisquit
Well-Known Member
Men are automatically attractive to gay men, it's just natural instinct.
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
I believe I used the wrong term earlier. I said deniability while trying to remember about falsifiability.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsifiability
eye exaggerate, I am having trouble with your responses to me. I see them as imprecise to the point of being without discussible content. That frustrates my desire to learn, not merely whether i agree with some of your bolder claims, but if I can even reduce them to a claim that can be tested, verified, falsified. Ya can't wrestle with gelatin.
cheers 'neer
Beefbisquit
Well-Known Member
Name one scientist who has claimed they can create life from nothing....
EDIT: Correction, NON-life.... not "nothing"
eye exaggerate
Well-Known Member
...art and science are one to me. I feel unified...that's enough for me to believe in God. That's enough for me to believe that I am a fraction of God.
Any artists here?
Any artists here?
eye exaggerate
Well-Known Member
...so then, what is it that science is trying to do? study the 'god-particle' at all??
Marlboro47
Well-Known Member
No, you are attacted to sin not the man. Men naturally want to be wicked.
You then think that you have a better friend because they seem chiller until you realize that they're creepy as shit.
eye exaggerate
Well-Known Member
neer, agreed, it's been swell.
Marlboro47
Well-Known Member
I hate typing, I wish I could just speak outloud to you guys... I hate technology...
Similar threads
