Is Gay Marriage Really That Big Deal?

doobnVA

Well-Known Member
we all drive, but do we all drive at 110 MPH?

Speed is a factor in less than one third of fatal auto accidents. Guess what the largest factor is? Alcohol.

No, we don't all drive 100 MPH, but that doesn't make driving any less dangerous.
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
Speed is a factor in less than one third of fatal auto accidents. Guess what the largest factor is? Alcohol.

No, we don't all drive 100 MPH, but that doesn't make driving any less dangerous.
driving faster is more dangerous. do 110 downtown. :hump:




ok, since you want to refuse to get my point,...

we all drive, but do we all drive drunk?

why do i constantly have to explain my posts? do you not really get what i mean, or are you simply refusing to see it? not just you but most of the people who hang in politics. :neutral:


you said everyone's lifestyle was dangerous, then compared it to drivng.
some gays practice dangerous lifestyles, i compared that to speeding.

do you get it?

you can't defend that by saying driving is safe. YOU just said it was dangerous. :wall:


big circles, keeps them dizzy. :wink:
 

CrackerJax

New Member
Aren't all social behaviors affected by the environment they happen in. It's quite possible that the perceived lifestyle of the gay population is completely over hyped by the media, who just want you to watch their crummy commercials.
It's also quite possible that the years of persecution real and implied towards the gays bring about the behavior which ppl seem to think is 110MPH.

Gays are affected by their environment just like everyone else. Their environment has been trampled on and spat on for a long long time now.

If they want to fly pedal to the metal, fine by me... I just want some notice so I can get out of the way.... :wink:
 

doobnVA

Well-Known Member
driving faster is more dangerous. do 110 downtown. :hump:




ok, since you want to refuse to get my point,...

we all drive, but do we all drive drunk?

why do i constantly have to explain my posts? do you not really get what i mean, or are you simply refusing to see it? not just you but most of the people who hang in politics. :neutral:


you said everyone's lifestyle was dangerous, then compared it to drivng.
some gays practice dangerous lifestyles, i compared that to speeding.

do you get it?

you can't defend that by saying driving is safe. YOU just said it was dangerous. :wall:


big circles, keeps them dizzy. :wink:

I never said driving was safe. You're completely missing my point.

A gay person's lifestyle isn't any more dangerous than a straight person, unless the straight person lives in a bubble. I used driving as an example, because most Americans own and drive vehicles. I could have just as easily used sex as an example, but people seem to buy into some false notion that gays are more likely to contract STDs (which isn't the case) than heterosexuals.

How is a gay person's lifestyle any more dangerous than anyone else's?
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
ever spend any time in SF? the gay lifestyle is dangerous, sorry.

why can a man sleep with as many women as he wants and not be looked down upon? now make him a gay man sleeping with other gay men. see how the door is a little BIGGER? gay men are more opted to practice dangerous sex.

tap, tap, tap, ...... :hump:
 
P

PadawanBater

Guest
ever spend any time in SF? the gay lifestyle is dangerous, sorry.

why can a man sleep with as many women as he wants and not be looked down upon? now make him a gay man sleeping with other gay men. see how the door is a little BIGGER? gay men are more opted to practice dangerous sex.

tap, tap, tap, ...... :hump:

Source?

Why is homosexual sex more dangerous than heterosexual sex? More specifically, since I think it's what you're implying, anal sex? Aren't the risks involved the same?
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
Source?

Why is homosexual sex more dangerous than heterosexual sex? More specifically, since I think it's what you're implying, anal sex? Aren't the risks involved the same?
source? me, 40 years in the bay area. everyday walking down the street. the clubs, the park bathrooms, the bath houses.


ever here of AIDS. why was it a predominantly homosexual disease in the beginning?

who said anything about anal sex. you all need help. :neutral:

*unsubscribed*
 

doobnVA

Well-Known Member
ever spend any time in SF? the gay lifestyle is dangerous, sorry.

why can a man sleep with as many women as he wants and not be looked down upon? now make him a gay man sleeping with other gay men. see how the door is a little BIGGER? gay men are more opted to practice dangerous sex.

tap, tap, tap, ...... :hump:

Being looked down upon is completely irrelevant. People who look down on homosexuals do so because they find it "disgusting" or "abhorrent" or "unnatural", not because it's any more dangerous than being heterosexual.

Anyone can contract an STD, even heterosexuals. The risk is dependent largely on socioeconomic factors such as education, locality, financial means, etc. This means a heterosexual from a poor neighborhood who didn't finish school and whose parents were uninvolved (or absent) is more likely to practice unsafe sex (and contract an STD) than a homosexual from an upper-middle class, two parent family with a college education and the financial means to obtain "protection".

Carelessness and ignorance also have much more to do with risk than does sexual orientation.
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
Source?

Why is homosexual sex more dangerous than heterosexual sex? More specifically, since I think it's what you're implying, anal sex? Aren't the risks involved the same?
source? me, 40 years in the bay area. everyday walking down the street. the clubs, the park bathrooms, the bath houses.


ever here of AIDS? WHY was it a predominantly homosexual disease in the beginning?

who said anything about anal sex. you all need help. :neutral:

*unsubscribed*
before i get ass raped.
 

doobnVA

Well-Known Member
ever here of AIDS. why was it a predominantly homosexual disease in the beginning?

who said anything about anal sex. you all need help. :neutral:
It was a predominantly homosexual disease because it's more easily transmitted through ANAL intercourse than vaginal intercourse. Why? Because anal sex is more likely to result in bleeding than vaginal intercourse.


Now that we know condoms can prevent the spread of HIV, those who are informed and not careless (and possess the means to obtain them) use them. This includes homosexuals.

Is HIV still a predominantly homosexual disease? No, it affects the poor and uneducated more than anyone else.
 

hom36rown

Well-Known Member
Sex is dangerous...we should ban it.

You know, regardless if gays can marry or not, they are still going to have sex.
 

leeny

Active Member
Sex is dangerous...we should ban it.

You know, regardless if gays can marry or not, they are still going to have sex.
lmao you are right! and is the issue really GETTING MARRIED?!

let's be realistic- it's about the politics. (aka-Money) joint benefits.
lets say there is a group of 500 people

250 women

250 men

125 gays

125 lesbians

that means that if 125 men marry 125 women and all the men have a job that handout joint benefits then that is 125 insurance payments.

and if the remaining 250 gays/lesbians can't get married then that is 250 insurance payments... but if they do get married then it is only 125 insurance payments....oh shit!

all about the money
 

hom36rown

Well-Known Member
Married people are always saying the sex life sucks...so this should be all the more reason to let gays marry, right?...less of all that dangerous sex.
 

Green Cross

Well-Known Member
Anyone who can't admit that gay sex is more dangerous... either drank the kool aid, or doesn't know how Hepatitis and Aids are primarily spread.

But there are 2 more reasons gay marriage isn't accepted. 1. The separation of church and state. The state cannot interfere in religious matters.

2. The definition of marriage is a "Vow" between a man and a women, and a "vow" is a religious bond - it's a promise to God. I'm sure this will go over most your heads, but purpose of a vow is to serve God, not suit yourselves. Of course this is why we see a constant attack on Christianity, and religion, from the gays and the libs who represent them, even here on this board.


Why not just get joined, instead of married?
 

doobnVA

Well-Known Member
Anyone who can't admit that gay sex is more dangerous... either drank the kool aid, or doesn't know how Hepatitis and Aids are primarily spread.

But there are 2 more reasons gay marriage isn't accepted. 1. The separation of church and state. The state cannot interfere in religious matters.

2. The definition of marriage is a "Vow" between a man and a women, and a "vow" is a religious bond - it's a promise to God. I'm sure this will go over most your heads, but purpose of a vow is to serve God, not suit yourselves. Of course this is why we see a constant attack on Christianity, and religion, from the gays and the libs who represent them, even here on this board.


Why not just get joined, instead of married?

Marriage vows are promises made to EACH OTHER, not "god"...

AIDS is not "spread", it is a result of an HIV infection.

SAFE SEX, is always less dangerous than UNSAFE sex, whether you're gay or straight.

Do you know who is most likely to practice UNSAFE sex? The poor. Not gays.

Now go away.
 

hom36rown

Well-Known Member
Anyone who can't admit that gay sex is more dangerous... either drank the kool aid, or doesn't know how Hepatitis and Aids are primarily spread.
Sex is dangerous, got it. So we should really be outlawing gay sex, not gay marriage, right?

But there are 2 more reasons gay marriage isn't accepted. 1. The separation of church and state. The state cannot interfere in religious matters.
Fortunately, marriage as a legal contract, has nothing to do with the church. Churches wouldnt be forced to perform gay weddings, if it were legal. They can keep their definition of marriage as anything they want it to be.

2. The definition of marriage is a "Vow" between a man and a women, and a "vow" is a religious bond - it's a promise to God. I'm sure this will go over most your heads, but purpose of a vow is to serve God, not suit yourselves. Of course this is why we see a constant attack on Christianity, and religion, from the gays and the libs who represent them, even here on this board.
Oh I see, so than atheists should not be allowed to marry either, right?

Why not just get joined, instead of married?
I suppose because homosexuals want to be equal to their heterosexual counterparts...strange concept eh?
 
Top