REPARATIONS ? Yes !!

buckaclark

Well-Known Member
so you are saying the Jews were showered in gifts of a nice attempt at diversion. Trying to connect the dots here.
I'm saying at some point in history everyone has been shitted on by others and reparations are not the answer to move forward. Unfortunately you seem stuck in a petty Grammer fight here .
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
I think his entire reparations "movement" is a cynical and racist shot at the actual, and much more
well-deserved reparations movement for slave descendants.
I support your right to think and speak cynical about what you want, even when it's incorrect.

All victims deserve to be made whole by the person(s) that harmed them. I'm not in favor of "government" paying reparations though in either case.
That shifts the financial responsibility onto the wrong people, thus creating MORE victims.

I hope you get everything you deserve in life.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
I'm saying at some point in history everyone has been shitted on by others and reparations are not the answer to move forward. Unfortunately you seem stuck in a petty Grammer fight here .
I rather like Grammer. He was aces in Down Periscope.

Orthography is a different thing entirely, and I have no respect for those too lazy to see to theirs. It is generally bundled with slipshod reasoning, like libertarian delusionism.

Serin is the German spelling of serine, one of the essential nutrient amino acids. Kosher, too. How that would be a detriment to Jews escapes me.
 

orangejesus

Well-Known Member
I think his entire reparations "movement" is a cynical and racist shot at the actual, and much more
well-deserved reparations movement for slave descendants. He's reasoning that if they can get
reparations, why not try getting them for cannabis crimes. So snide and degrading. I'm not signing
on to his notion of it. I'd go for cannabis crimes reparations of course, I'm a felon of cannabis crime,
but not in the way rob roy couches it, esp., with his libertarian, anti-government blather that the magats
were singing about since before they had the red hats, during the regime of Reagan. As soon as I hear
that crap, I turn away. I've heard it and seen it for 40 years, and I know the type. Put on your red hat baby,
and let it shine, shine, shine. :spew:

Snide maybe, but how is it racist?

If the ancestors of slave owners who still hold wealth today should pay reparations to people who's ancestors helped create that wealth...

...Shouldn't politicians and their minions pay reparations to people who they put in jail for "drug crimes" in recent years?

Didn't many of those politicans deprive people in a kind of "systemic drug bias akin to racism" from providing for their own families? Stigmatize them ?

Steal their houses? Shoot their dogs? Steal their kids and "sell them" off to state approved foster care, much like slave masters sold children of slaves?

Steal their labor from them while the "druggies" were forced to work in jail to support those politicans living like Plantation masters?


Reparations now!!!
 

CANON_Grow

Well-Known Member
How far back should we investigate to determine who is entitled to reparations? Not sure why reparations would apply to scenario's where someone was convicted of a crime in the past that is no longer a crime now. Just because a law has been updated doesn't change the fact that a law was broken in the past. Should this apply to speeding tickets when speed limits change? There would be real benefit to expunge criminal records for cannabis crime at certain thresholds, say personal use. If you were moving a shit ton of cannabis in the past, not sure that should be included.

Politicians that were against cannabis in the past should not be able to profit from cannabis now, but if politicians had to pay when they changed a law, why would a politician ever try and change a bad law? Sounds like a slippery slope, and one that could be used and abused to benefit certain groups.
 

buckaclark

Well-Known Member
How far back should we investigate to determine who is entitled to reparations? Not sure why reparations would apply to scenario's where someone was convicted of a crime in the past that is no longer a crime now. Just because a law has been updated doesn't change the fact that a law was broken in the past. Should this apply to speeding tickets when speed limits change? There would be real benefit to expunge criminal records for cannabis crime at certain thresholds, say personal use. If you were moving a shit ton of cannabis in the past, not sure that should be included.

Politicians that were against cannabis in the past should not be able to profit from cannabis now, but if politicians had to pay when they changed a law, why would a politician ever try and change a bad law? Sounds like a slippery slope, and one that could be used and abused to benefit certain groups.
Fore ever until the objective is achieved.
 

doublejj

Well-Known Member
Stop yo damn scammin.you can't legally benefit from illegal activities.
Big oil and gas kept a dirty secret for decades. Now they may pay the price
After a century of wielding extraordinary economic and political power, America’s petroleum giants face a reckoning for driving the greatest existential threat of our lifetimes.

An unprecedented wave of lawsuits, filed by cities and states across the US, aim to hold the oil and gas industry to account for the environmental devastation caused by fossil fuels – and covering up what they knew along the way.
Coastal cities struggling to keep rising sea levels at bay, midwestern states watching “mega-rains” destroy crops and homes, and fishing communities losing catches to warming waters, are now demanding the oil conglomerates pay damages and take urgent action to reduce further harm from burning fossil fuels.
But, even more strikingly, the nearly two dozen lawsuits are underpinned by accusations that the industry severely aggravated the environmental crisis with a decades-long campaign of lies and deceit to suppress warnings from their own scientists about the impact of fossil fuels on the climate and dupe the American public.
 

CANON_Grow

Well-Known Member
how much do you think they should be made to pay?
I don't think it's a question that can be answered. In my opinion, reparations should be about removing barriers and allowing access to programs/loans/grants that would have previously not been available. If anyone took a risk breaking a law, with either cannabis or alcohol during prohibition, they should not be rewarded when the law is changed but the penalty should be removed. I am specifically referring to personal use/possession.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
I don't think it's a question that can be answered. In my opinion, reparations should be about removing barriers and allowing access to programs/loans/grants that would have previously not been available. If anyone took a risk breaking a law, with either cannabis or alcohol during prohibition, they should not be rewarded when the law is changed but the penalty should be removed. I am specifically referring to personal use/possession.
I was thinking more along the line that the gangsters made bank off an unfair situation. They very definitely were not about personal use/possession. Thus it seems to me that their descendants are not entitled but liable.
 
Last edited:

doughper

Well-Known Member
Holocaust victims?
Snide maybe, but how is it racist?
It's racist because by asking for cannabis reparations is mocking the black
request for reparations. He's "snidely" asking for cannabis reparations merely to
insult the black reparations movement. Pretty cute.
 

CANON_Grow

Well-Known Member
I was thinking more along the line that the gangsters made bank off an unfair situation. They very definitely were not about personal use/possession. Thus it seems to me that their descendants are not entitled but liable.
I don't think they should liable. It would not be right to penalize someone that did nothing wrong, we don't get to choose family history. Once there have been multiple generations, how does anyone determine net-benefit or net-loss?
 

orangejesus

Well-Known Member
Holocaust victims?
It's racist because by asking for cannabis reparations is mocking the black
request for reparations. He's "snidely" asking for cannabis reparations merely to
insult the black reparations movement. Pretty cute.
ah, totally makes sense - so when Dave Chappelle does his white guy impression, he's being a racist? I mean, he is profiting at the expense of an entire group of people... I think he should donate some of his riches to the 'poor whites' in OH he often mentions...
 
Top