Covid vaccine not so safe? Video of nurse passing out.

Status
Not open for further replies.

PadawanWarrior

Well-Known Member
I use an RZ Mask.. comes with a replaceable carbon filter, but I have one of these too.... still in the bag, not even sure why I bought it LOL!
I'd wear a mask when you're messing with soil too. I don't know if @subcool wore one when he was messing with that shit, but he was especially a person that should have masked up with soil shit. I don't know, but it's too bad he's not around anymore. Nothing to do with COVID though.
 
Last edited:

DoubleAtotheRON

Well-Known Member
I'd wear a mask when you're messing with soil too. I don't know if Subcool wore one when he was messing with that shit, but he was especially a person that should have masked up with soil shit. I don't know, but it's too bad he's not around anymore. Nothing to do with COVID though.
Yeah, I prob need to do that. We're about to transplant the main room with about 120 cubic ft of soil by hand.
 

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
I agree it is logical to take advantage of your competitors that are disadvantaged for what ever reason it is just a little suspicious that the virus that caused that disadvantage originated in China and has benefitted them greatly.
yeah, it is...and i'm not saying it's impossible they didn't release it on purpose, although i think the much more likely scenario is that they fucked up and it got out on accident, and they HATE to admit they fucked up...i don't think it was any kind of planned attack, or they would have been much better prepared for it than they were. they've only reported about 5600 deaths, but witnesses say they were lying, and the numbers are MUCH higher...do the math, they have almost 4 times as many people as us...and we've had over 700K deaths....they're at over a million dead, i guarantee it.
 

PadawanWarrior

Well-Known Member
yeah, it is...and i'm not saying it's impossible they didn't release it on purpose, although i think the much more likely scenario is that they fucked up and it got out on accident, and they HATE to admit they fucked up...i don't think it was any kind of planned attack, or they would have been much better prepared for it than they were. they've only reported about 5600 deaths, but witnesses say they were lying, and the numbers are MUCH higher...do the math, they have almost 4 times as many people as us...and we've had over 700K deaths....they're at over a million dead, i guarantee it.
 

DoubleAtotheRON

Well-Known Member
yeah, it is...and i'm not saying it's impossible they didn't release it on purpose, although i think the much more likely scenario is that they fucked up and it got out on accident, and they HATE to admit they fucked up...i don't think it was any kind of planned attack, or they would have been much better prepared for it than they were. they've only reported about 5600 deaths, but witnesses say they were lying, and the numbers are MUCH higher...do the math, they have almost 4 times as many people as us...and we've had over 700K deaths....they're at over a million dead, i guarantee it.
This is a perfect example of Media control. And any of those scenarios are entirely possible. But yeah, math is math. This is kinda like the 9/11 deal. The TV cuts to the BBC with a live shot of the area and the Brits are reporting that Building 7 has just fallen. But in the live shot at the BBC, Building 7 is clearly still standing.
 

PURPLEB3RRYKUSH

Well-Known Member
This is a perfect example of Media control. And any of those scenarios are entirely possible. But yeah, math is math. This is kinda like the 9/11 deal. The TV cuts to the BBC with a live shot of the area and the Brits are reporting that Building 7 has just fallen. But in the live shot at the BBC, Building 7 is clearly still standing.
It was a controlled demo to have an excuse to raid afghan and the middle east and up airport security
 

Lockedin

Well-Known Member
Why is that a surprise @Herb & Suds ?

Roger, DIY and a few others have been saying how much they wish people who think differently than they do would die a horrible death.

Did you not read that?
Do you think they're joking?

I don't.
How is that not a policy violation btw?

Stupid people do and say stupid things.
- like wishing death upon a stranger that actually agrees with them more than disagrees.
But rather than reason with people - they threaten violence. Plain STUPIDITY.

The emotions run way too high on these subjects.

Me? I think the extremes on BOTH SIDES ARE IDIOTS.
Yes. There is a middle ground - COMMON SENSE and a butt-hair's worth of COURTESY.
 

injinji

Well-Known Member
Nothing really. I was just stating that claimed effectiveness is not accurate. I feel like they told people a long time ago that Flu vax was practically 100%, but looking at that CDC report, it's clearly not after decades of making a Flu vax. They are claiming that Covid vax (while not 100% affective) is less affective than they are claiming after seeing the amount of "breakthrough" cases.
No one has ever said the flu shot was 100%. If it is over 50% effective it's a good year. The thing is there is lots of strains of flu and they have to start the vaccine up to a year before hand, so they guess which strains will be predominate.

They break down the covid vax effectiveness into three groups. Catching it, going in the hospital and dying. The way science works, when new data comes in, they work with the new data. And over time the vax will be less effective.

In this country we are bless that the info if public. China and Russia do produce numbers that are not rooted in reality. If you were scared of those vaccines, you might be being prudent.
 

Lockedin

Well-Known Member
No one has ever said the flu shot was 100%. If it is over 50% effective it's a good year. The thing is there is lots of strains of flu and they have to start the vaccine up to a year before hand, so they guess which strains will be predominate.

They break down the covid vax effectiveness into three groups. Catching it, going in the hospital and dying. The way science works, when new data comes in, they work with the new data. And over time the vax will be less effective.

In this country we are bless that the info if public. China and Russia do produce numbers that are not rooted in reality. If you were scared of those vaccines, you might be being prudent.

It still stands that if I told you I just had a second shot of an unapproved vaccine 18 months ago - you'd call me an idiot.

I can't stand politics (poly = many, ticks = blood sucking arachnids)
I got my shots because...
1. My (progressive leaning) Dr's advice and his actions - we went to the same place, same day.
2. Approval - Pfizer has full approval, (so do cigarettes...)
3. Season - Covid / Flu / Cold season is starting here, my natural immunity will be boosted by the vaccine - as explained by my Dr.
So I went in on the same day as two entire departments of my Wife's hospital and got mine at the same time as the medical professionals.

Explain why that would upset ANYONE???
 

injinji

Well-Known Member
The distinction between vaccinated/ unvaccinated makes no scientific sense, since both can be infected with and transmit covid.
You are 10 times more likely to get covid if you are not vaxed. (11 times more likely to die from it)

Getting the vax would be like decimating (reduce by 1/10th) the chances of catching covid, then decimating it again and again and again and again and again and again and again, etc, etc, until you are down to 10%. So yea, it does make scientific sense to take the vaccine.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top