Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
So you're okay with the person working commercially not being forced to serve somebody she'd prefer not to ?Irrelevant because of the contact.
So you're okay with the person working commercially not being forced to serve somebody she'd prefer not to ?Irrelevant because of the contact.
Your arguments are pathetic and you’ve not convinced one person of your racial segregationSo you're okay with the person working commercially not being forced to serve somebody she'd prefer not to ?
Neither was my statement. By “your” I meant women in general.that wasn't meant to be derogatory.
Too many negatives, who is not forcing who to not serve who what?So you're okay with the person working commercially not being forced to serve somebody she'd prefer not to ?
or being UN-civil.Too many negatives, who is not forcing who to not serve who what?
A hypothetical lady is a whore. She performs sex acts for money. She is "licensed" and commercially employed.Too many negatives, who is not forcing who to not serve who what?
Your arguments are pathetic and you’ve not convinced one person of your racial segregation
So you are asking the same question that I already answered. See original answerA hypothetical lady is a whore. She performs sex acts for money. She is "licensed" and commercially employed.
For her own reasons she doesn't want to perform sex acts on another person due to their race. Would you be in favor of forcing her to serve the person (potential customer) she prefers not to?
What if the sex worker was wearing a glove and her specialty was confined to handy acts?So you are asking the same question that I already answered. See original answer
Which brings up another question about how far you'd go forcing unwilling people to serve others...Eat shit and die neo nazi
Every once in a while in life we are forced, however we may dislike, to just use common sense and realize that sex acts are not the same as other businesses.What if the sex worker was wearing a glove and her specialty was confined to handy acts?
Every once in a while in life we are forced, however we may dislike, to just use common sense and realize that sex acts are not the same as other businesses.
That being said, show me a ho who turns away business. Don’t worry rob, if they take me they will take you
Please leave my thread. We have not mutually agreed you can be here. Please fuck off with your stupid comparisons that reek of racism and segregation. Let the normal folk debate for once so we don’t have to listen to your same old bullshit rhetoric.So you'd be okay with forcing a licensed sex worker who was moonlighting making sandwiches at Subway (let's hope she's washed her hands) to make you a sandwich ?
But you wouldn't be okay with making her squeeze somebody's foot long ?
scrote coatWhen it's true love..
View attachment 4373366
foot long? you're the only one with a foot long..So you'd be okay with forcing a licensed sex worker who was moonlighting making sandwiches at Subway (let's hope she's washed her hands) to make you a sandwich ?
But you wouldn't be okay with making her squeeze somebody's foot long ?
everyone is entitled to their opinion, xenophobic canadian.Please leave my thread. We have not mutually agreed you can be here. Please fuck off with your stupid comparisons that reek of racism and segregation. Let the normal folk debate for once so we don’t have to listen to your same old bullshit rhetoric.
Ummm ya that’s me, the xenophobic asking the segregationist who brings nothing, to leave my thread, speaking of which you added my country. Wow that’s so ironic coming from you.everyone is entitled to their opinion, xenophobic canadian.
I would be ok forcing subway to serve anybody yes, the employee can always find another job if they don’t like serving people.So you'd be okay with forcing a licensed sex worker who was moonlighting making sandwiches at Subway (let's hope she's washed her hands) to make you a sandwich ?
But you wouldn't be okay with making her squeeze somebody's foot long ?
I would disagree that he/she has brought nothing, the question put forth is clearly to what extend does the law go. Furthermore the poster has. Even polite about it.Ummm ya that’s me, the xenophobic asking the segregationist who brings nothing, to leave my thread, speaking of which you added my country. Wow that’s so ironic coming from you.
He brings the same bullshit scenario to every thread since I’ve been here. You can waste your time trying to debate him if you want but a debate typically has solutions and not just made up scenarios that entail a black person serving a white person or a child being raped by an adult because he thinks if the child consents it’s ok which is vile and sick. Sorry but I prefer he not be on my thread and if he believes in mutual consent he won’t return .I would disagree that he/she has brought nothing, the question put forth is clearly to what extend does the law go. Furthermore the poster has. Even polite about it.