Immigrant Child 'Allegedly' Dies After Release From ICE Camp

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
The kid died because of unsanitary conditions, and contracted a respiratory condition and was not treated by the ICE OFFICALS. And Died upon Release.

This isn't the 1st case of neglect either.

Last month they gave an infant back to the mother after many months in detention, and was also in bad shape, and looked to not have a a diaper change in weeks.

Come on. If you are cool with this youre an animal, and a no good motherfu^^^r.
+rep:clap:

 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
How are they spouting anything except whats up?? We got the 1st Amendment here in USA. Like it or not. This is the very 1st thing our founders ratified.

Don't Like It??

Go to Russia, or China. People here died for these amendments, and will die again against anyone who wants to limit the press.
Bad shit will happen if they try and shut the press down, and I will be with them, for the cause of freedom.
Civil War WILL BREAK OUT IF THEY FUCK WITH THE PRESS.

Im betting more people are FOR the Press vs Against.

Like the NAZIs have been outnumbered 1000s to 1 on these marches. Well see how it goes for them, when theres 5000 people to 1.
People aint gonna put up with that nonsense.



Anyone against the 1st Amendment/FREE PRESS....

is a Communist/NAZI/DICTATOR/FASCIST, or some other kind of no good son of a b.

FREE PRESS IS THE 1ST AMENDMENT THEY RATIFIED.

SO IT WAS FIRST PEOPLE, AND THEY THOUGHT IT WAS MOST IMPORTANT.

Another good 1.

All the Faux News viewers know that

Faux WON A LAWSUIT ON THE BASIS THEY HAVE NO LEGAL OBLIGATION TO TELL THE TRUTH??

You Faux people know this right???

If you didn't, you do now.

FAUX IS TOTALLY DISCREDITED AS A NEWS OUTLET. THOUGH THEY DO TRY AND HAVE A TOKEN REPORTER OR 2 TO REFUTE HANNITY, AND OTHERS.
SHEPARD SMITH IS 1.

YOU CANT HAVE IT BOTH WAYS.

YOU CANNOT BE A NEWS ORGANIZATION WITH CREDIBILITY, AND WIN A LAWSUIT ON THE BASIS YOU HAVE NO LEGAL OBLIGATION TO TELL THE FRIGGIN TRUTH.o_Oo_Oo_Oo_O:wall::wall::wall::wall::wall::wall::cuss::cuss::cuss:

FAUX is FAKE NEWS. Plain and Simple.
Faux is AT BEST BAD ENTERTAINMENT, but would be hilarious, except theyre serious.:shock::shock:

Religious Extremism on either side is equal

1 isn't any worse than the other.

They all want women to bend in servitude, cover their heads, don't leave the house without an escort, and have no general say in anything. Men can have many wives, yet if a woman has 2 men, shes stoned to death, or some other ancient form of death.
I don't want any religious anything dictating what my rights should be based on some book that men wrote to control the masses, and then weak minded people follow it blindly like a cult, of which they are.:finger::finger:

It's Official: FOX 'News' Is NOT News So They Don't Have ...
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/9/13/1698414/-It-s-Official...
But they would have to accept the argument that they are allowed to lie because they aren't really news. So far, Fox News has not complained about this characterization of their programming. What does that tell you? How Fox News Deceives and Controls Their Flock: Fox Nation vs. Reality: The Fox News Cult of Ignorance




Fox News produced brazenly ignored the standards of professional journalism. They aired overtly biased "news" stories that were filled with misrepresentations and outright lies. PolitiFact has rated sixty percent of their their work as "Mostly False," "False," or "Pants on Fire." The other cable news networks don't even come close to that dubious achievement. This shameful record may have contributed to Fox News being yanked from British television for what they said was lack of viewers.

they shouldn't be allowed to have 'news' in their name.

no one wants to listen to that shit except the rednecks, hillbillys and nazis..something about being gullible which connects them to conspiracy theory fans and belief in the bible.

weak minded people. who don't/won't/can't realize that it is the options you've chosen which dictates how your life unfolds.
 

Buddha2525

Well-Known Member
they shouldn't be allowed to have 'news' in their name.

no one wants to listen to that shit except the rednecks, hillbillys and nazis..something about being gullible which connects them to conspiracy theory fans and belief in the bible.

weak minded people. who don't/won't/can't realize that it is the options you've chosen which dictates how your life unfolds.
That's my problem with "free press" I'm sorry, the press shouldn't have 100% "freedom" because there's no voting tests given. Hence, a completely free press is a recipe for disaster, like what we saw in the past presidential elections, since I was born.

The press should be held accountable to not write outright lies, and then say "oh, it's just their opinion, man!" Nope, that doesn't fly. There's too many gullible people out there who believe Alex Jones, as to those who believe Mother Jones or Vox.

Fight the good fight, later!
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
That's my problem with "free press" I'm sorry, the press shouldn't have 100% "freedom" because there's no voting tests given. Hence, a completely free press is a recipe for disaster, like what we saw in the past presidential elections, since I was born.

The press should be held accountable to not write outright lies, and then say "oh, it's just their opinion, man!" Nope, that doesn't fly. There's too many gullible people out there who believe Alex Jones, as to those who believe Mother Jones or Vox.

Fight the good fight, later!
you're an obvious nazi. you know we all know this already, right?

every time you open your mouth trump's dick plops out
 

jimihendrix1

Well-Known Member
tRump should be held accountable for outright lies.

If he was, hed have been gone before he was elected.


Anyone against FREE PRESS isnt American.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
class action suit..the people v. trump.

the shit he's put us through?..drug manufacturers must be having a fvcking heyday.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Allegedly is slang for when you agree with what happened, but don't want to look like an uncaring asshole. Look up how lefty sites used the word alleged when talking about when Islamic countries threw gay people off of rooftops to their death. "Muslims allegedly throw gays off roofs." This isn't a symptom of what the right does, but a symptom of those bastards who control the media, and are neither right nor left. The only thing they care about is making money, and by dividing. But they think we're too stupid to realize this, and many are. Since many don't read both sides, they don't realize the other side uses the same language, proving both sides are the same person pretending.

https://news.vice.com/article/gruesome-photos-allegedly-show-islamic-state-throwing-gay-men-off-a-tall-building
allegedly is accusation without disposition ie innocent until proven otherwise.

in this case the toddler is dead. death is proof that life no longer exists.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
How are they spouting anything except whats up?? We got the 1st Amendment here in USA. Like it or not. This is the very 1st thing our founders ratified.

Don't Like It??

Go to Russia, or China. People here died for these amendments, and will die again against anyone who wants to limit the press.
Bad shit will happen if they try and shut the press down, and I will be with them, for the cause of freedom.
Civil War WILL BREAK OUT IF THEY FUCK WITH THE PRESS.

Im betting more people are FOR the Press vs Against.

Like the NAZIs have been outnumbered 1000s to 1 on these marches. Well see how it goes for them, when theres 5000 people to 1.
People aint gonna put up with that nonsense.



Anyone against the 1st Amendment/FREE PRESS....

is a Communist/NAZI/DICTATOR/FASCIST, or some other kind of no good son of a b.

FREE PRESS IS THE 1ST AMENDMENT THEY RATIFIED.

SO IT WAS FIRST PEOPLE, AND THEY THOUGHT IT WAS MOST IMPORTANT.

Another good 1.

All the Faux News viewers know that

Faux WON A LAWSUIT ON THE BASIS THEY HAVE NO LEGAL OBLIGATION TO TELL THE TRUTH??

You Faux people know this right???

If you didn't, you do now.

FAUX IS TOTALLY DISCREDITED AS A NEWS OUTLET. THOUGH THEY DO TRY AND HAVE A TOKEN REPORTER OR 2 TO REFUTE HANNITY, AND OTHERS.
SHEPARD SMITH IS 1.

YOU CANT HAVE IT BOTH WAYS.

YOU CANNOT BE A NEWS ORGANIZATION WITH CREDIBILITY, AND WIN A LAWSUIT ON THE BASIS YOU HAVE NO LEGAL OBLIGATION TO TELL THE FRIGGIN TRUTH.o_Oo_Oo_Oo_O:wall::wall::wall::wall::wall::wall::cuss::cuss::cuss:

FAUX is FAKE NEWS. Plain and Simple.
Faux is AT BEST BAD ENTERTAINMENT, but would be hilarious, except theyre serious.:shock::shock:

Religious Extremism on either side is equal

1 isn't any worse than the other.

They all want women to bend in servitude, cover their heads, don't leave the house without an escort, and have no general say in anything. Men can have many wives, yet if a woman has 2 men, shes stoned to death, or some other ancient form of death.
I don't want any religious anything dictating what my rights should be based on some book that men wrote to control the masses, and then weak minded people follow it blindly like a cult, of which they are.:finger::finger:

It's Official: FOX 'News' Is NOT News So They Don't Have ...
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/9/13/1698414/-It-s-Official...
But they would have to accept the argument that they are allowed to lie because they aren't really news. So far, Fox News has not complained about this characterization of their programming. What does that tell you? How Fox News Deceives and Controls Their Flock: Fox Nation vs. Reality: The Fox News Cult of Ignorance




Fox News produced brazenly ignored the standards of professional journalism. They aired overtly biased "news" stories that were filled with misrepresentations and outright lies. PolitiFact has rated sixty percent of their their work as "Mostly False," "False," or "Pants on Fire." The other cable news networks don't even come close to that dubious achievement. This shameful record may have contributed to Fox News being yanked from British television for what they said was lack of viewers.
America does not have a free press anymore. Corporate America bought it and turned it into their official mouthpiece.

Americans stood idly by when the Federal Government did away with fairness and accuracy standards.

They continued to cite Fix News even after it successfully defended itself in a lawsuit that accused it of manufacturing news- in other words, LYING- by saying it was merely an entertainment outlet.

If you want news you now have to go looking for it. The major outlets have realized that most Americans not only don't care but are eager to swallow whatever they're fed.

Read 'Bad News' by former CBS Senior Correspondent Tom Fenton for insights on how this ball got rolling decades ago.

Carefully read any article I post here, especially if Smogdog or anyone else here objects. If they object to the source, bookmark it and read several articles pasted there...

And then think critically. It's a lost art anymore.

Is Russia really an existential threat to America or are they just trying to defend themselves against a totally out of control imperialist power trying to justify history's largest defense budgets?

Does America really need a Space Force? Who is the threat? Why are they the answer? Or is it just another gigantic boondoggle paid for by an increasingly impoverished American taxpayer?

I leave you to find the answers to these and other important questions on your own. Just don't expect to find them on websites like CNN, MSNBC, CBS, FOX, etc.
 
Last edited:

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Your use of trivia as sweeping facts is a tell that you are touting propaganda.

For example, in an awful act of homophobia, two men were thrown from a roof in December, 2015. You say: "Islamic countries threw gay people off of rooftops to their death.:

I don't know what your agenda is but there are now two things we can say about you:

1) You suck authoritarian dick
2) You play lose with facts and distort them for some purpose.

Your posts stink of authoritarian propaganda.
Your posts stink of kowtowing to that very authoritarianism.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
The very fact that you're allowed to post with out consequence speaks to the greatness of the freedoms we enjoy in this country. Why do you pretend to be a liberal?
I'm not liberal and you've just proven you're far too stupid to have figured that out by now. Congratulations!
 

Justin-case

Well-Known Member
I'm not liberal and you've just proven you're far too stupid to have figured that out by now. Congratulations!
pro·gres·sive
prəˈɡresiv/
adjective
  1. 1.
    happening or developing gradually or in stages; proceeding step by step.
    "a progressive decline in popularity"
    synonyms: continuing, continuous, increasing, growing, developing, ongoing, accelerating, escalating;More

  2. 2.
    (of a group, person, or idea) favoring or implementing social reform or new, liberal ideas.

    "a relatively progressive governor"
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
It seems we are using the same word with different meaning.

rad·i·cal
ˈradək(ə)l/
adjective
noun

  1. Advocating or based on thorough or complete political or social change; representing or supporting an extreme or progressive section of a political party.

    ‘a radical American activist’
Synonyms:
revolutionary, progressive, reforming, reformist, revisionist, progressivist
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
I'm not liberal and you've just proven you're far too stupid to have figured that out by now. Congratulations!

liberal

ADJECTIVE

(in a political context) favouring individual liberty, free trade, and moderate political and social reform.
‘a liberal democratic state’

progressive, advanced, modern, forward-looking, forward-thinking, progressivist, go-ahead, enlightened, reformist, radical
 

Justin-case

Well-Known Member
liberal
ADJECTIVE

(in a political context) favouring individual liberty, free trade, and moderate political and social reform.
‘a liberal democratic state’

progressive, advanced, modern, forward-looking, forward-thinking, progressivist, go-ahead, enlightened, reformist, radical
Not sure I'd call him a radical, posting on riu in the middle of the night is about as proactive as he gets, he also doesn't believe in violence, or so he says. I catch a heavy scent of bullshit and athoritarianism from tty, mirroring Putin/trump on too many issues to just be coincidence. Maybe we can get some other's opinions on it, would be interesting.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Not sure I'd call him a radical, posting on riu in the middle of the night is about as proactive as he gets, he also doesn't believe in violence, or so he says. I catch a heavy scent of bullshit and athoritarianism from tty, mirroring Putin/trump on too many issues to just be coincidence. Maybe we can get some other's opinions on it, would be interesting.
Because tty has emotional and behavioral issues that make him as bipolar in politics as he is socially we can't use him as a standard for what Progressives(TM) advocate. The movement he favors does not advocate progressive change, they advocate all or nothing.

The GOP radical right advocates their policies with the same impatience with gradual change. So, I called Progressives(TM) radical for their impatience. They are clearly not radical left in social policies, they advocate socialist programs in a capitalist society. I do think that demanding immediate implementation all of their policies -- universal health care, the overhaul of campaign financing, abandoning fossil fuel use, free college, $15 minimum wage, others -- is radical in schedule BUT not radical in policy.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
nope

Tell me more about how the people of Portland should not oppose neo-Nazis when they converge on the city from across the country to march through their streets while making death threats at them, their families and neighbors.
Home Depot and Lowes in that area shouldn't be selling them tiki torches..i find them to be complicit before the fact.
 
Top