Immigrant Child 'Allegedly' Dies After Release From ICE Camp

Discussion in 'Politics' started by schuylaar, Aug 10, 2018.

  1.  
    schuylaar

    schuylaar Well-Known Member

    Stink Bug, ttystikk and Montuno like this.
  2.  
    Buddha2525

    Buddha2525 Active Member

    Allegedly is slang for when you agree with what happened, but don't want to look like an uncaring asshole. Look up how lefty sites used the word alleged when talking about when Islamic countries threw gay people off of rooftops to their death. "Muslims allegedly throw gays off roofs." This isn't a symptom of what the right does, but a symptom of those bastards who control the media, and are neither right nor left. The only thing they care about is making money, and by dividing. But they think we're too stupid to realize this, and many are. Since many don't read both sides, they don't realize the other side uses the same language, proving both sides are the same person pretending.

    https://news.vice.com/article/grues...ic-state-throwing-gay-men-off-a-tall-building
     
    Stink Bug and schuylaar like this.
  3.  
    Gilligans Island

    Gilligans Island Active Member

    People die everyday. Big deal.
     
  4.  
    Justin-case

    Justin-case Well-Known Member

    We don't think you're stupid, we know you're stupid.
     
    UncleBuck likes this.
  5.  
    Buddha2525

    Buddha2525 Active Member

    What part don't you agree?

    The media are all the same, spouting garbage to incite fear, hate, and division?
    Muslims should be allowed to throw gays off rooftops, because to say otherwise would be against cultural relativism?
     
  6.  
    jimihendrix1

    jimihendrix1 Well-Known Member

    The kid died because of unsanitary conditions, and contracted a respiratory condition and was not treated by the ICE OFFICALS. And Died upon Release.

    This isn't the 1st case of neglect either.

    Last month they gave an infant back to the mother after many months in detention, and was also in bad shape, and looked to not have a a diaper change in weeks.

    Come on. If you are cool with this youre an animal, and a no good motherfu^^^r.
     
    ttystikk, Huckster79, bundee1 and 5 others like this.
  7.  
    Justin-case

    Justin-case Well-Known Member

    A free press is a vital part of any democracy. You're very dense.
     
    Huckster79, Fogdog, Bear420 and 2 others like this.
  8.  
    Buddha2525

    Buddha2525 Active Member

    Of course it is, how else do they get what they want?

    "Drawing on the insights of his Uncle Sigmund – a relationship Bernays was always quick to mention – he developed an approach he dubbed “the engineering of consent.” He provided leaders the means to “control and regiment the masses according to our will without their knowing about it.” To do so, it was necessary to appeal not to the rational part of the mind, but the unconscious."

    http://theconversation.com/the-mani...rnays-and-the-birth-of-public-relations-44393
     
    ttystikk likes this.
  9.  
    jimihendrix1

    jimihendrix1 Well-Known Member

    How are they spouting anything except whats up?? We got the 1st Amendment here in USA. Like it or not. This is the very 1st thing our founders ratified.

    Don't Like It??

    Go to Russia, or China. People here died for these amendments, and will die again against anyone who wants to limit the press.
    Bad shit will happen if they try and shut the press down, and I will be with them, for the cause of freedom.
    Civil War WILL BREAK OUT IF THEY FUCK WITH THE PRESS.

    Im betting more people are FOR the Press vs Against.

    Like the NAZIs have been outnumbered 1000s to 1 on these marches. Well see how it goes for them, when theres 5000 people to 1.
    People aint gonna put up with that nonsense.



    Anyone against the 1st Amendment/FREE PRESS....

    is a Communist/NAZI/DICTATOR/FASCIST, or some other kind of no good son of a b.

    FREE PRESS IS THE 1ST AMENDMENT THEY RATIFIED.

    SO IT WAS FIRST PEOPLE, AND THEY THOUGHT IT WAS MOST IMPORTANT.

    Another good 1.

    All the Faux News viewers know that

    Faux WON A LAWSUIT ON THE BASIS THEY HAVE NO LEGAL OBLIGATION TO TELL THE TRUTH??

    You Faux people know this right???

    If you didn't, you do now.

    FAUX IS TOTALLY DISCREDITED AS A NEWS OUTLET. THOUGH THEY DO TRY AND HAVE A TOKEN REPORTER OR 2 TO REFUTE HANNITY, AND OTHERS.
    SHEPARD SMITH IS 1.

    YOU CANT HAVE IT BOTH WAYS.

    YOU CANNOT BE A NEWS ORGANIZATION WITH CREDIBILITY, AND WIN A LAWSUIT ON THE BASIS YOU HAVE NO LEGAL OBLIGATION TO TELL THE FRIGGIN TRUTH.o_Oo_Oo_Oo_O:wall::wall::wall::wall::wall::wall::cuss::cuss::cuss:

    FAUX is FAKE NEWS. Plain and Simple.
    Faux is AT BEST BAD ENTERTAINMENT, but would be hilarious, except theyre serious.:shock::shock:

    Religious Extremism on either side is equal

    1 isn't any worse than the other.

    They all want women to bend in servitude, cover their heads, don't leave the house without an escort, and have no general say in anything. Men can have many wives, yet if a woman has 2 men, shes stoned to death, or some other ancient form of death.
    I don't want any religious anything dictating what my rights should be based on some book that men wrote to control the masses, and then weak minded people follow it blindly like a cult, of which they are.:finger::finger:

    It's Official: FOX 'News' Is NOT News So They Don't Have ...
    https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/9/13/1698414/-It-s-Official...
    But they would have to accept the argument that they are allowed to lie because they aren't really news. So far, Fox News has not complained about this characterization of their programming. What does that tell you? How Fox News Deceives and Controls Their Flock: Fox Nation vs. Reality: The Fox News Cult of Ignorance




    Fox News produced brazenly ignored the standards of professional journalism. They aired overtly biased "news" stories that were filled with misrepresentations and outright lies. PolitiFact has rated sixty percent of their their work as "Mostly False," "False," or "Pants on Fire." The other cable news networks don't even come close to that dubious achievement. This shameful record may have contributed to Fox News being yanked from British television for what they said was lack of viewers.
     
    Last edited: Aug 10, 2018
  10.  
    jimihendrix1

    jimihendrix1 Well-Known Member

    Now it’s being reported that the PR division of the Trump administration, Fox News, has been dumped in the U.K. The Guardian published the report Tuesday morning and Fox News confirmed it:

    “[Fox] has decided to cease providing a feed of Fox News Channel in the UK,” said a spokeswoman for the company. “Fox News is focused on the US market and designed for a US audience and, accordingly, it averages only a few thousand viewers across the day in the UK. We have concluded that it is not in our commercial interest to continue providing Fox News in the UK.”

    The failure of Fox News abroad is not as trivial a matter as they seek to make it. England is a nation that is closely aligned with the U.S. and deeply concerned about our policies and politics. The dearth of viewers has nothing to do with the “focus” of the network. The Brits are more likely repulsed by the obvious bias and propaganda. They have many other news sources, including several from the U.S., to find out what America is up to. CNN isn’t having any trouble attracting a British audience.

    What’s more, Fox’s excuse that their programming is America-centric is an admission that it isn’t actually news. Honest journalism is the collection and reporting of facts that reflect reality. It is not impacted by geography. Reports on the war in Afghanistan, a hurricane in Texas, or trade relations with the EU, should be identical regardless of the place of publication. But Fox’s programs are littered with an extraneous spin that reeks of American superiority. How could anyone in Liverpool or Dublin listen to two minutes of Sean Hannity or Tucker Carlson without retching?

    Fox News may have another reason for ditching their British flank. Fox’s chairman, Rupert Murdoch, has been trying to acquire the sixty percent of Sky Broadcasting that they don’t already own. But there are regulators in the UK that have to approve the deal. At present it is under investigation by Ofcom to ascertain whether they meet broadcasting standards. And there is some question as to how that will come out. The Guardian reports that:

    “In the past decade, Fox has notched up 22 breaches of its licence and Ofcom’s codes and rules. Of those, seven were against Fox News, with four last year including against a programme which featured a guest who said that Birmingham was a city ‘where non-Muslims just simply don’t go’.”

    Add to that the hacking scandal a few years back where Murdoch’s newspapers were found to have illegally accessed the emails and cell phones of politicians, celebrities, and even a murdered schoolgirl. It’s that sort of behavior that caused Murdoch to temporarily suspend his acquisition aspirations. But he is now actively pursuing the matter again.

    How Fox News Deceives and Controls Their Flock:
    Fox Nation vs. Reality: The Fox News Cult of Ignorance.
    Available now at Amazon.


    Having a “news” network that is notorious for lying and disparaging foreign nations, while disseminating White House propaganda, cannot be particularly helpful when trying to persuade British regulators to give it even more power. In the meantime, the UK will enjoy the relief of not having Fox News polluting their airwaves and insulting their viewers. America awaits its opportunity to enjoy such relief.
     
  11.  
    Montuno

    Montuno Well-Known Member

    This is the same that al-Quaeda says about the USA citicens that they assasain...
    Anyway I never will say the same if your childrens are killed someday (n I will pray to Allah it never happens...)
     
    ttystikk likes this.
  12.  
    Montuno

    Montuno Well-Known Member

    Worse that any no human animal, is better sayed...
     
  13.  
    Montuno

    Montuno Well-Known Member

    You can be Comunist n be a democratic n believe in the free press... It is like to say that all Muslimes are terrorist or all the WASP in USA likes the Ku Kux Klan...
     
    ttystikk and bundee1 like this.
  14.  
    gonnagro

    gonnagro Well-Known Member

    Stink Bug likes this.
  15.  
    Fogdog

    Fogdog Well-Known Member

    Your use of trivia as sweeping facts is a tell that you are touting propaganda.

    For example, in an awful act of homophobia, two men were thrown from a roof in December, 2015. You say: "Islamic countries threw gay people off of rooftops to their death.:

    I don't know what your agenda is but there are now two things we can say about you:

    1) You suck authoritarian dick
    2) You play lose with facts and distort them for some purpose.

    Your posts stink of authoritarian propaganda.
     
  16.  
    rkymtnman

    rkymtnman Well-Known Member

    UncleBuck and Fogdog like this.
  17.  
    Fogdog

    Fogdog Well-Known Member

    UncleBuck, Montuno and rkymtnman like this.
  18.  
    rkymtnman

    rkymtnman Well-Known Member

    I thought everyting Obama did was wrong so Trump would do the opposite, which would be right? Amirite?
     
    Huckster79, UncleBuck and Fogdog like this.
  19.  
    Fogdog

    Fogdog Well-Known Member

    The implication that what Obama did justifies what Trump did makes total sense.

    [​IMG]
     
    UncleBuck and rkymtnman like this.
  20.  
    schuylaar

    schuylaar Well-Known Member

    they're a BIG part of what keeps our government on payola by corporations..they need their mid term and 4-year fix with advertising..what happens when they lose it- so they won't which is why they went along with a 2016 blackout on Bernie- and still do. They're as much to blame as Hillary..for gods sake they were writing articles and letting clinton crew edit..WTF???
     
    Buddha2525 likes this.

Share This Page