New Beginnings for Massachussetts and I

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
I'll go through a half lb between cycles, about a Z a week, plus some for concentrates. Not to mention what I give away to friends.. With a typical 8-9 week flower period, plus dry and cure time, 10zs wouldn't last me a cycle. So I either have to keep more on hand, or grow twice the number of plants ands run cycles and have double the harvests. Why should they dictate how I produce what I use?

When they start putting limits on alcohol, cigarettes ands prescription meds, then maybe I'll think about following the law.
Grow bigger plants. My average is 20oz per.
 

greg nr

Well-Known Member
Get ready for a full on assfucking if they catch you with it in your car, bro.

The police state still needs its victims from whom they can extract their blood money.
"Technically" this should have stopped under decriminalization. You were allowed up to 1 oz per person before it was a criminal penalty, but in practice they would combine all the weed found and say it was over an ounce, then charge everyone. Forget that they couldn't charge you even with a citation if it wasn't physically on you. They did that anyway.

And forget the part where they can't use smell as probable cause. They find probable cause any time they need it.

So the 1 oz limit per person in transit doesn't mean squat. They will get it over an ounce when they want to. They weigh packaging, they spray the weed down with water, they just estimate the weight. You are over when they say you are over.

This law should have wiped a lot of that away, but they are setting thresholds and limits so low nobody will clear them.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Well now you would be limited to 2 Oz per household. You would instantly be violating the 2 Oz limit weeks before harvest, and that's with a single plant.

No concentrates or even Kiefe allowed either.

And nobody under 25, recriminalizing a new generation.

These laws essentially ban home grows and completely gut the new law.

We already had an ounce under decriminilization. Woo hoo, now we have 2.

I'm a life long dem, but they are going to lose the statehouse with this crap.
Call them and let them know that if they continue to trample your rights that they'll lose their coveted office.

You'll be voting for those who will PROTECT your rights, not sell them off to the highest bidder.

Those candidates are coming; Google 'Justice Democrats'
 

greg nr

Well-Known Member
Grow bigger plants. My average is 20oz per.
You wouldn't be able to. The limit will be 2 oz per household, and the way the law is worded all plant weight counts, wet, including leaves. I doubt I could grow a single plant that would mature with under 2 oz of leaves, let alone flower plus leaf.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
"Technically" this should have stopped under decriminalization. You were allowed up to 1 oz per person before it was a criminal penalty, but in practice they would combine all the weed found and say it was over an ounce, then charge everyone. Forget that they couldn't charge you even with a citation if it wasn't physically on you. They did that anyway.

And forget the part where they can't use smell as probable cause. They find probable cause any time they need it.

So the 1 oz limit per person in transit doesn't mean squat. They will get it over an ounce when they want to. They weigh packaging, they spray the weed down with water, they just estimate the weight. You are over when they say you are over.

This law should have wiped a lot of that away, but they are setting thresholds and limits so low nobody will clear them.
Exactly. The police state mentality continues.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
You wouldn't be able to. The limit will be 2 oz per household, and the way the law is worded all plant weight counts, wet, including leaves. I doubt I could grow a single plant that would mature with under 2 oz of leaves, let alone flower plus leaf.
This just strips the new legalization laws of their intended purpose and as such would be an excellent target for a defense to say that they're simply meant to disenfranchise the will of the people.

Several such cases happened here in Colorado and DAs got the hint and quit prosecuting.
 

MrSeeDoubleU

Well-Known Member
This just strips the new legalization laws of their intended purpose and as such would be an excellent target for a defense to say that they're simply meant to disenfranchise the will of the people.

Several such cases happened here in Colorado and DAs got the hint and quit prosecuting.
Still destroy and or take your lights equipment. All the above. Pay for a lawyer miss work. It just all in all creates a havoc and the police knows this.
 

greg nr

Well-Known Member
Very exciting! I opened the tent tonight to check on the little ladies and a funky smell wafted up. First time I've smelled anything and they are still in diapers!

I'll probably give them their big girl pants this weekend. Not quite there yet......
 

Paka978

Well-Known Member
I started out with really old used 400W MH in bell reflectors, the kind of lights seen in gyms and such.

I upgraded to HPS on magnetic ballasts, then later got digitals for them.

Then I discovered 860W CDM lights (big brother to 315W CMH) and ran them on those same magnetic ballasts.

About a year ago, I took delivery of a bunch of water cooled COB LED modules of my own design and I've been running these ever since.

In the last few weeks I just got a bunch of 250W Razor bars from HLG, with which I'll retire my remaining HID lights.

Finally, I have a pair of very early prototype quantum fixtures with 4 boards each, running 'wall washer' lenses that throw light from overhead onto an adjacent vertical surface. After a design iteration, I'll be getting more of these.
Quantum ?? Those are t5's the hydrofarm fixtures ?
 
Top