Is the World Flat? The Flatlander's theory..

Status
Not open for further replies.

reddan1981

Well-Known Member
a squared + b squared = c squared won't work for circumference, and won't allow you to see past a curve.

so if radius is 3960mi, diameter is 7920mi.

circumference is pi x diameter so 3.14 x 7920mi is 24,868.9mi circumference.

to use your right triangle, imagine quadrant 1 as in the graph posted above, so circumference divided by 4. so 24,868.8mi/4 is 6,217.2 mi.

so the circumference of the right triangle from the radius of earth is 6,217.2 miles...

Pythagoras theorem is a squared + b squared = c squared so:

(3960x3960) + (3960x3960)=31,363,200

the square root of 31,363,200 is the hypotenuse.

hypotenuse = 5600.28mi

circumference = 6217.2mi
What graph posted above? You didn't read it before posting. You are also arguing against mainstream theory, showing cognitive inconsistencies.
 
Last edited:

SunnyJim

Well-Known Member
You are clutching at strings mate, the hypotenuse is the sum of A squared + B squared.
For someone so adamantly convinced of your own opinion, why do you have to clutch at strings and why can you not provide evidence for your belief?
Do you dispute that you made that post and then quickly edited it out?

Don't add dishonesty to your repertoire. It's unbecoming.
 

reddan1981

Well-Known Member
Then repost your unedited statement so there's no ambiguity.
Diversion tactics.
What was written is irrelevant now. I do chop and change the way I present this argument ad-lib.
Why are you focusing on this red herring?
Do you need to change the subject for a specific reason?
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
So here I am back in the flatlanders thread after my promised 2 month break and it has gone one another 100 pages has anything changed since my absence?
No, as evidence isn't the problem. Interpretation of said evidence is the problem, even when mathematics is universal

I'm not in it to change people's minds, I think if you can't grasp that the Earth is clearly not flat by multiple routes of corroborating evidence by now, nothing presented could possibly change your mind otherwise. I'm here to see how ridiculous it can get. Flat Earth theory is more preposterous than denying anthropogenic climate change
 

tangerinegreen555

Well-Known Member
Flat Earth theory is more preposterous than denying anthropogenic climate change
I don't believe such 'theory' actually exists, here or anywhere. It's a fucking troll game associated with being sucked into every conspiracy theory...

I've been around a long time. This shit all started with minor errors in the Warren Report of the JFK assassnation and look what we have today!
 

Drowning-Man

Well-Known Member
No, as evidence isn't the problem. Interpretation of said evidence is the problem, even when mathematics is universal

I'm not in it to change people's minds, I think if you can't grasp that the Earth is clearly not flat by multiple routes of corroborating evidence by now, nothing presented could possibly change your mind otherwise. I'm here to see how ridiculous it can get. Flat Earth theory is more preposterous than denying anthropogenic climate change
Yeah no matter how much evidence you give they just keep babbling you know who I'm talking about, mr "the Holocaust didn't happen Jews are taking over the world" I hate that fucking ignorant fuck what a ass hat.
 

SunnyJim

Well-Known Member
Diversion tactics.
What was written is irrelevant now. I do chop and change the way I present this argument ad-lib.
Why are you focusing on this red herring?
Do you need to change the subject for a specific reason?
That your thought process takes you to a place where a hypotenuse can be curved is indicative of how little you understand about the subject being discussed.

You even posted a little image of the Pythagorean Theorem to illustrate your point as if Pada was confused by the complex mathematics you were presenting.

No diversion tactics, just bewilderment at your idea of what a right triangle looks like.
 

reddan1981

Well-Known Member
That your thought process takes you to a place where a hypotenuse can be curved is indicative of how little you understand about the subject being discussed.

You even posted a little image of the Pythagorean Theorem to illustrate your point as if Pada was confused by the complex mathematics you were presenting.

No diversion tactics, just bewilderment at your idea of what a right triangle looks like.
ac8e1baae8535062e99d1b02ad1d3c82b124ba3aa455a8ad1c1d33b166b79be5.jpg
 

Mellowman2112

Well-Known Member
The Earth is 26,000 miles in circumference

= .32% of curvature

So it wouldn't be surprising that you believe the world is flat based on your incorrect assumption that you shouldn't be able to see Ireland from Wales


Yes, approximately 26000 miles and based on the earth being a sphere the drop would be 3433 feet according to simple geometry, meaning ireland would be 3433 feet below the supposed horizon. The highest point in that part of ireland is 1200 feet. IF you look carefully at the photo you can see a and mass stretching all the way across the bottom of the photo. You lose, try again.
 

Mellowman2112

Well-Known Member
You've been provided with evidence which you choose to reject.

The absence of evidence isn't the evidence of absence. You still need to prove your flat Earth theory. Had you completed any law studies, you would've know that already. Since you didn't, you don't. Donkey.
jewood.jpg ovadia.jpg


Assumptions are not proof. Yes, Goyim are donkeys here to serve the Jews I got that part already.
 

cat of curiosity

Well-Known Member
Yes, approximately 26000 miles and based on the earth being a sphere the drop would be 3433 feet according to simple geometry, meaning ireland would be 3433 feet below the supposed horizon. The highest point in that part of ireland is 1200 feet. IF you look carefully at the photo you can see a and mass stretching all the way across the bottom of the photo. You lose, try again.
ireland isn't big enough to cover the entire horizon from that distance. you lose, try again (fucking copycat).

you speak of a drop of 3433. that is a bad ass equation.

3433. no addition, subtraction, multiplication, division...

just 3433. = world is flat.

you lose again, try again dumb fuck. and stop copying me unless you grow a few million brain cells. i don't want you embarrassing me, using my words with your stupidity.
 

Mellowman2112

Well-Known Member
I don't believe such 'theory' actually exists, here or anywhere. It's a fucking troll game associated with being sucked into every conspiracy theory...

I've been around a long time. This shit all started with minor errors in the Warren Report of the JFK assassnation and look what we have today!
Really? So you are saying bullets can change direction in mid flight, you believe in the magic bullet theory I guess. If you believe that you will believe anything the gubbermint tells you. I understand now. I guess you have to, otherwise you would have to come to the conclusion that your government benefits might be cut off one day. omg, The horror.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top