That has to be the record for the longest first post in forum history. Congrats and thanks for swinging by!
After reading 30 pages its gonna be a long sump up lol!.... i noticed im not the only one who posted here for there first time this thread as the power to do that with so much misleading information. But anyhow ive been here before my name was quebecgold I just cant login anymore...
I'll address a few things for shits and gigs:
They're the same product only DG's Protekt is way more concentrated. And the only way to truly be fair is to keep Protket a constant which is what I did in this grow.
I dont believe they are the same product.... just putting it in your solution will show you different ppm and ph readings.... Haven't done it yet but would gladly try it out...
Did you journal these grows like I have? Please post a link.
Man ive only made one journal in my life and it was in 2006 when I first started growing mostly AN products when I was worried about yield... now I think less is more.... maybe some good info in there i dont remember much it was 10 years ago.
http://www.marijuanapassion.com/forum/showthread.php?t=5789
Im actually planning a cycle where I will use only a&b + potassium silicate on one tray and then use a&b + many additives but no bloom boosters. I will make a journal of it.... Next cycle will be a journal to see which potassium silicate works better. and last one will be a cycle to see which terp enhancer works better or if they work better used all together. I know terpinaor works after I use it in veg my plants stank the next day no smell was detected before that stem rub gave a fruity aroma it didnt have the day before the strain is the screme cut.
Unless these different brand all have the EXACT mineral content then your yields will be affected.
I dont believe that.... if u want more yield get more light and add c02! that i believe.... buying a different brand of nuts to expect larger yield is for giggles! anyone who knows anything for real will tell you thats non sense... nutrients are to keep your plants healthy not for larger yield but clearly if they are in good heath they will yield good.
You're talking about environmental things which have been dialed in here for a decade. These tests were all conducted in the same environment as to eliminate variables.
doesnt change the fact that yield could of been less because of clones thats a variable you cant control... i never had a clone yield the same in the same media drinking from the same reservoir under the same light inside a 2sq feet radius.
This is where you're wrong. All NPKs are not created equal. If you don't understand this then I'd suggest reading up on the topic.
I dont really care for npk it can have the same npk and show you different visual results that you can clearly notice.... I believe the product that grows the biggest healthy leafs will grow the biggest healthy buds..... i see so many products with the same npk that show large amounts of differences in results....
You cannot flush your plants, only your medium.
my plants are flushed and the reason I say that is because once they consume all the nutrients stored they start yellowing.... but anyhow im french so im not gonna argue with you but u know what i mean.
But anyhow ain't no point to argue about nutrients when it barely as any effect on yield... its the least important factor when it comes to yield....
I just couldnt believe you blamed the nutrients for having fluffy buds at the bottom.... clearly those buds didnt get light cause even without nutrients they would have tight buds if they were getting light.... things like that make you doubt the integrity of the comparison.... i read all this to end up realizing you forcing yourself to think DG is a better product.... i think the only thing better about it is the price to be honest.... which is a good thing u totally right for saying ull stick with dg over an but the comparison lacks realness....