Charlie Hebdo does it again

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Nope, I really think Jihad is a simple, extremely violent response to Western exploitation, say for instance, the taking away a significant portion of the land called Palestine, by the powers that was at that moment, meaning GB,USA,FR, as a gift to all the European Jews that they all felt sad about letting them die in the first place.
Exploitation and abuse are wrong. That is why there is a Israel (thank Allah). What I don't like are people that make up their own rules, and say " What's wrong? Every one else did it". Why persecute me? Anti-Semitic thought? Why?
I don't think it is even that, I think Europe and North America are both still as full of racist ass holes as ever and they support Israel because they're still trying to answer "the Jewish Question". Win-win for the imperialist ass holes, the Jews leave and we have a militarized state in the center of the drama with a border that cordons off all of Africa.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
The Israeli government's biggest problem is that the Palestinians are too peaceful and do not respond with sufficient violence to attacks and illegal settlements to provide adequate impetus for their annihilation. Otherwise, the Palestinians would have been massacred decades ago. If Israel was really a Western democracy, it would be secular and everyone would be equal under the law.
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
Nope, I really think Jihad is a simple, extremely violent response to Western exploitation, say for instance, the taking away a significant portion of the land called Palestine, by the powers that was at that moment, meaning GB,USA,FR, as a gift to all the European Jews that they all felt sad about letting them die in the first place.
Exploitation and abuse are wrong. That is why there is a Israel (thank Allah). What I don't like are people that make up their own rules, and say " What's wrong? Every one else did it". Why persecute me? Anti-Semitic thought? Why?
How can you say that when Sunni Conquest Jihad is 1500 years old? It has never meant in history what they try to make it mean today. It is a last gasp attempt by the Arab Spring type lies, to not have this Holy War that is called for by Modern Jihad. JIhad didn't hyjack Islam. They are Islam. The Moderates are aposte, lives forfeit just to be moderate. These new Moderates don't get to define Islam anymore than the Protestants got to define the Church of Rome.

To be here in the West is just to learn to pull us down. It has never stopped. Thomas Jefferson confronted it in his day. They are after us, not the other way around.

Now I do agree it is a delicate thing. But, it is like Protestants coming to the new world and saying TOO BAD, we are calling ourselves Catholics but we acting in Protest... we do what we want. Fuck the Pope, but we are the Catholics now, not you. No. Even the King of England could not pull that off. He stayed the same but changed the name. And he persecuted Protestants.

No. The Protestants, Puritans, Lutherans, etc had to break apart FOR REAL and suffer, to become safe under the new names in America. Think about it.
 
Last edited:

londonfog

Well-Known Member
How can you say that when Sunni Conquest Jihad is 1500 years old? It has never meant in history what they try to make it mean today. It is a last gasp attempt by the Arab Spring type lies, to not have this Holy War that is called for by Modern Jihad. JIhad didn't hyjack Islam. They are Islam. The Moderates are aposte, lives forfeit just to be moderate. These new Moderates don't get to define Islam anymore that the Protestants got to define the Church of Rome.

To be here in the West is just to learn to pull us down. It has never stopped. Thomas Jefferson confronted it in his day. They are after us, not the other way around.

Now I do agree it is a delicate thing. But, it is like Protestants coming to the new world and saying TOO BAD, we are calling ourselves Catholics but we acting in Protest... we do what w want. No. That took the King of England to pull that off. And he persecuted Protestants.

No. The Protestants, Puritans, Lutherians, etc had to break apart FOR REAL and suffer, to become safe under the new names in America. Think about it.
What Muslim countries have you visited ?
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
What are the nice Muslim Countries to visit?

Where would I go to feel there is as much equality, gender respect and individual freedom as in the USA?
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
You weren't around when I put up the pages of my US Passport's visa stamps? Fun times. Too bad you missed it.

So, where should I go next? Money and time. I wanted to go to Egypt. Jordan maybe? Dubai?
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
You weren't around when I put up the pages of my US Passport's visa stamps? Fun times. Too bad you missed it.

So, where should I go next? Money and time. I wanted to go to Egypt. Jordan maybe? Dubai?
Definitely Dubai. Take me and we'll play a round or two of golf.

The main religion of Dubai is the love of money though, I'm not sure it counts. Try Dearborn, the Henry Ford museum is worthwhile.
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
Definitely Dubai. Take me and we'll play a round or two of golf.

The main religion of Dubai is the love of money though, I'm not sure it counts. Try Dearborn, the Henry Ford museum is worthwhile.
Ah the shrine of the great Anti-Semitic Capitalist. They teach of this in Jihad school.
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
You weren't around when I put up the pages of my US Passport's visa stamps? Fun times. Too bad you missed it.

So, where should I go next? Money and time. I wanted to go to Egypt. Jordan maybe? Dubai?
I would suggest Indonesia... Jakarta should be your first stop.
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
So, the ACLU would be on your list as a terrorist organization. Good comparison. This is not a free world yet, we are too busy motherfucking the other guy. Some do it verbally, others do it with guns. I say freedom of speech, should hold responsibility when it assaults another's beliefs and way of life. Even in the USA, the bastion of free speech and liberty, acknowledges that. I can defame at will in this country, with only jail as a deterrent. Fucking with a Muslim, they play with a different set of rules. You want freedom of speech, go walk into a theater and yell fire, you will be arrested. Walk into a Catholic church, and say Christ sucks,they will say I'll pray for you. Walk into a mosque, and say the same thing about Mohamed, and it would be within their right according to their cult, and required, to chop your fucking head off.( die for Mohammed in jail) Walk into a synagogue, and they will probably beat you, and then sue. (lol) Walk into a bodega in the Bronx, and say Puerto Ricans are inbred criminals, and you will not make it out alive. (good chance). My point is, with the right to free speech come responsibility, and the sooner that is understood, the more the world can get along. I have no qualms about political attacks. But fucking with someone's religion, that takes it too far.
So when are the people going to stop fucking with the Christians? Oh wait, they are not...

You cant pick and choose.

You cannot say freedom of speech only goes so far.

What happens if we agree that nobody draws a picture of Mohammed and then next week the Jihadists start blowing up every fast food place in America that serves pork because they are offended. Do we suddenly stop eating pork so we dont offend muslims?

Political correctness is creeping into everything. You cant say nigger. Why? Well, because someone might be offended.

WEll, Jimdamick, your posts here offend me. So, to follow your own suggestion, quit posting here forever so I will not be offended any further. Thanks for your cooperation.
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
Charlie Hebdo is publishing tomorrow another cartoon featuring Mohammed on it's cover.
The Egyptian state sponsored Islamic Authority has already denounced it as further insult to the world's 1.5 billion Muslims.
Free press gone wild ? How far is far enough? Should the right to say fuck you to the all the Muslim on the planet be accepted in 2015, KNOWING it will lead to further strife, and more attacks (bet on it) on targets of opportunity. What would the world say if Jews, blacks, or any other culture, were attacked on the front cover ( stereotypical racist cartoons). I feel now is the time to tone it down, and the editors ( what's left of them) sort of owe it to their country to take a break from purposely pissing of 20% of France's population. Come on guy's, now is not the fucking time to throw more fuel on the fire. Give your country a break. That is my opinion.
I've seen the cover. It isn't insulting or disrespectful. Muslims go against their own faith when they elevate Mohammed to the level of a god.
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
right here.



got 'likes' from ginwilly and desert dude. no surprises there.

the three vanilla face racists.
so choking on his own bile is "wishing death" on somebody?

youre an idiot.

the southern poverty law center is a bullshit organization that exists solely to gin up imaginary racism and point a crooked stumpy sausage finger at anyone who dares oppose the lefty agenda.

and yes, morris dees can choke on his own bile.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
so choking on his own bile is "wishing death" on somebody?

youre an idiot.

the southern poverty law center is a bullshit organization that exists solely to gin up imaginary racism and point a crooked stumpy sausage finger at anyone who dares oppose the lefty agenda.

and yes, morris dees can choke on his own bile.
most people die when they choke. so yes, it counts.



i bet if i looked for other people who shared your opinion about the SPLC i would come up with a whole bunch more like the specimens above.

but you want us to believe that it is just coincidence that you have come to have the same exact views as white supremacists and that you are in no way racist, simply 'enlightened'.

i got a bridge if you're interested.
 

MiG pilot

Well-Known Member
Political correctness is creeping into everything. You cant say nigger. Why? Well, because someone might be offended.
Is it true that there is a proposal to replace the offensive word "woman" to politically correct "vaginal-American"?
 
Top