Growerguy420
Active Member
The reason why It seems many people moved to citrus over the classic is because it has lower Phosphorous than classic but higher nitrogen than the blossom. Citrus at a 20-10-20 ratio versus classic duo at a 20-20-20 then using the 10-30-20 blossom to flower which many people found to sometimes have issues keeping leaves healthy and green throughout the grow....using the citrus 20-10-20 throughout the whole grow cycle was not only extremely easy and fail proof but kept everything nice and healthy right up to harvest. The alternative is to switch back to the classic from the blossom after final stretch in flower which is what I used to do before switching to citrusAre you saying Jack's Citrus is better than Classic? Not trying to argue. It's just that, you've said we should "just do the math." If you loved Citrus, I imagine it was for some quantifiable reason. Likewise, you've advocated how inexpensive Jack's is. If there was something quantifiably better about Citrus, what's wrong with spending $25 (discarding your Classic)? That amortizes out to about $1.50 per month. Is it not that much better?
I know it sounds like I'm trying to turn your own argument against you. Perhaps I am, but it's just to understand where you would draw the line. For example, people say Golden Monkey Magic [whatever] is worth $300 a gallon because they grow cash crops and it increases yield enough that it's profitable.
Seems like the same reasoning, just different scales if you think Citrus is better enough to spend $1.50 more per month by aborting your use of Classic. It would also validate the principle that nutrients can be crop specific, or different ratios work better. If you're not willing, then I wonder what you love about it.
Last edited: