Satellite data proves Earth has not been warming the past 18 years - it's stable

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
There have been biased puff pieces, where the fox checks the hen house, that said no problem.

But, this is an election law issue now.

Hey if all investigations are equal to you, then what is wrong with one more?
anyone who bothers to read the "report" on the penn state "investigation" will rapidly conclude that

1: they were not terribly interested in looking at the allegations
2: they only looked at the allegation because of the negative press and pressure from alumni (donations and fundraising problems)
3: all "AGW climate science" is both "Ad Hoc" and "Subjective"
4: he did not "Significantly" deviate from "Accepted Procedures"
5: look at all this funding and all these awards he has gotten, he MUST be doing something right...(Argumentum ad Bernie Madoff)
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
anyone who bothers to read the "report" on the penn state "investigation" will rapidly conclude that

1: they were not terribly interested in looking at the allegations
2: they only looked at the allegation because of the negative press and pressure from alumni (donations and fundraising problems)
3: all "AGW climate science" is both "Ad Hoc" and "Subjective"
4: he did not "Significantly" deviate from "Accepted Procedures"
5: look at all this funding and all these awards he has gotten, he MUST be doing something right...(Argumentum ad Bernie Madoff)
now what about the other 7 investigations that cleared them of all wrongdoing?

:lol:

maybe roy spencer has an answer. or rushton. both unassailable authorities.
 

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
muyloco has no point since there are no bills under consideration right now, nor have there been for the last 5 years.

dumbass.
That is the point. They've failed so miserably that despite Obama's campaign pledge that climate legislation was one of his two top priorities, they've pretty much tabled it since 2011. They can't even garner enough interest from the Dems in the Senate to warrant a vote.

Nothing to see here folks, old news. Just a few zealots holding on to a failed, deceptive, Progressive agenda. I really had hoped for a little more from your side, oh well. Let's move on to more important topics that haven't fizzled and died. There must be some thriving industry you can cripple using some obscure endangered marmot.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
That is the point. They've failed so miserably that despite Obama's campaign pledge that climate legislation was one of his two top priorities, they've pretty much tabled it since 2011. They can't even garner enough interest from the Dems in the Senate to warrant a vote.

Nothing to see here folks, old news. Just a few zealots holding on to a failed, deceptive, Progressive agenda. I really had hoped for a little more from your side, oh well. Let's move on to more important topics that haven't fizzled and died. There must be some thriving industry you can cripple using some obscure endangered marmot.
that sure is a lot of hyperbole coming from the blockhead who literally called the conclusion of 34 national science academies a "hoax".

hell, the united states government is so committed to the hoax that they even hire infamous skeptics like roy spencer to pump out work for them!

tell me more about how this is all just a "hoax", smart guy!
 

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
that sure is a lot of hyperbole coming from the blockhead who literally called the conclusion of 34 national science academies a "hoax".

hell, the united states government is so committed to the hoax that they even hire infamous skeptics like roy spencer to pump out work for them!

tell me more about how this is all just a "hoax", smart guy!
I'm sorry, all requests must be filled out in TRIPLICATE before they will be processed by the Conservative Department of Triplicate Request Processing. If approved the request will be forwarded on to the Department of Redundency Department.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I'm sorry, all requests must be filled out in TRIPLICATE before they will be processed by the Conservative Department of Triplicate Request Processing. If approved the request will be forwarded on to the Department of Redundency Department.
too ashamed and embarrassed to even defend his own indefensible statements and beliefs.

not surprising.
 

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
too ashamed and embarrassed to even defend his own indefensible statements and beliefs.

not surprising.
Really? My statement mirrored yours, that no climate legislation has been voted on since 2011. I don't have to defend that which you have already acknowledged.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Really? My statement mirrored yours, that no climate legislation has been voted on since 2011. I don't have to defend that which you have already acknowledged.
i was asking you about your belief that the conclusion of 34 national science academies is a "hoax".

care to elaborate?

:lol:
 

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
i was asking you about your belief that the conclusion of 34 national science academies is a "hoax".

care to elaborate?

:lol:
Oh, you were asking me to defend a statement you made on my behalf. I thought for a second I had typed a statement in this thread and had completely forgotten I posted it.

Elaborate, you say? No need, you did a fine job of crediting me with your assumption.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Oh, you were asking me to defend a statement you made on my behalf. I thought for a second I had typed a statement in this thread and had completely forgotten I posted it.

Elaborate, you say? No need, you did a fine job of crediting me with your assumption.
awww, now he's running away from his own stupid, indefensible beliefs.

Any idiot gullible enough to purchase a carbon credit deserves a pointed finger and guffaw in addition to the senseless loss of wealth. As does any fool proposing it as a remedy for this hoax.
What a glorious day it is when the charlatans that Pad and UB prop up as experts are sued for every penny they have for propagating this suicidal hoax.
No, much like 90% of the individuals that were listed by the IPCC's "ground breaking" original report that also spearheaded this hoax along with Gore's crap movie.
That being said, the whole man made global warming hoax is exactly that, a hoax.

Gore has been one of the "front men" in the Man Made Global Warming hoax.

so tell us more about how 34 national academies of science are just engaging in a "hoax".

:lol:

don't run away from your own indefensible claims, blockhead. be proud! you are so smart and know way better than the world's leading climate scientists!
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Demographics
Residential demographics affect perceptions of global warming. In China, 77% of those who live in urban areas are aware of global warming compared to 52% in rural areas. This trends is mirrored in India with 49% to 29% awareness, respectively.

Of those countries where at least half the population are aware of global warming, those with the greatest proportion believing that global warming is due to human activities spend more on energy.

In Europe, individuals under fifty-five are more likely to perceive both "poverty, lack of food and drinking water" and climate change as a serious threat than individuals over fifty-five. Male individuals are more likely to perceive climate change as a threat than female individuals. Managers, white collar workers, and students are more likely to perceive climate change as a greater threat than house persons and retired individuals.

Political identification
In the United States, support for environmental protection was relatively non-partisan in the past. Republican Theodore Roosevelt established national parks whereas Democrat Franklin Delano Roosevelt established the Soil Conservation Service. This non-partisanship began to erode during the 1980s when the Reagan administration described environmental protection as an economic burden. Views over global warming began to seriously diverge between Democrats and Republicans during the negotiations that led up to the creation of the Kyoto Protocol in 1998. In a 2008 Gallup poll of the American public, 76% of Democrats and only 41% of Republicans said that they believed global warming was already happening. The gap between the opinions of the political elites, such as members of Congress, tends to be even more polarized.

In Europe, opinion is not strongly divided among left and right parties. Although European political parties on the left, and Green parties, strongly support measures to address climate change, conservative European political parties maintain similar sentiments, most notably in Western and Northern Europe. For example, France's center-right President Chirac pushed key environmental and climate change policies in France in 2005–2007, and conservative German administrations (under the Christian Democratic Union and Christian Social Union) in the past two decades have supported European Union climate change initiatives. In the period after former President Bush announced that the United States was leaving the Kyoto Treaty, European media and newspapers on both the left and right criticized the move. The conservative Spanish La Razón, the Irish Times, Irish Independent, the Danish Berlingske Tidende, and the Greek Kathimerini all condemned the Bush administration's decision along with left-leaning newspapers.

In Norway, a 2013 poll conducted by TNS Gallup found that 92% of those who vote for the Socialist Left Party and 89% of those who vote for the Liberal Party believe that global warming is caused by humans, while the percentage who held this belief is 60% among voters for the Conservative Party and 41% among voters for the Progress Party.

The shared sentiments between the political left and right on climate change further illustrate the divide in perception between the United States and Europe on climate change. As an example, conservative German Prime Ministers Helmut Kohl and Angela Merkel have differed with other parties in Germany only on "how to meet emissions reduction targets, not whether or not to establish or fulfill them."

Ideology
In the United States, ideology is an effective predictor of party identification, where conservatives are more prevalent among Republicans, and moderates and liberals among independents and Democrats. A shift in ideology is often associated with in a shift in political views. For example, when the number of conservatives rose from 2008 to 2009, the number of individuals who felt that global warming was being exaggerated in the media also rose.
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
Demographics
Residential demographics affect perceptions of global warming. In China, 77% of those who live in urban areas are aware of global warming compared to 52% in rural areas. This trends is mirrored in India with 49% to 29% awareness, respectively.

Of those countries where at least half the population are aware of global warming, those with the greatest proportion believing that global warming is due to human activities spend more on energy.

In Europe, individuals under fifty-five are more likely to perceive both "poverty, lack of food and drinking water" and climate change as a serious threat than individuals over fifty-five. Male individuals are more likely to perceive climate change as a threat than female individuals. Managers, white collar workers, and students are more likely to perceive climate change as a greater threat than house persons and retired individuals.

Political identification
In the United States, support for environmental protection was relatively non-partisan in the past. Republican Theodore Roosevelt established national parks whereas Democrat Franklin Delano Roosevelt established the Soil Conservation Service. This non-partisanship began to erode during the 1980s when the Reagan administration described environmental protection as an economic burden. Views over global warming began to seriously diverge between Democrats and Republicans during the negotiations that led up to the creation of the Kyoto Protocol in 1998. In a 2008 Gallup poll of the American public, 76% of Democrats and only 41% of Republicans said that they believed global warming was already happening. The gap between the opinions of the political elites, such as members of Congress, tends to be even more polarized.

In Europe, opinion is not strongly divided among left and right parties. Although European political parties on the left, and Green parties, strongly support measures to address climate change, conservative European political parties maintain similar sentiments, most notably in Western and Northern Europe. For example, France's center-right President Chirac pushed key environmental and climate change policies in France in 2005–2007, and conservative German administrations (under the Christian Democratic Union and Christian Social Union) in the past two decades have supported European Union climate change initiatives. In the period after former President Bush announced that the United States was leaving the Kyoto Treaty, European media and newspapers on both the left and right criticized the move. The conservative Spanish La Razón, the Irish Times, Irish Independent, the Danish Berlingske Tidende, and the Greek Kathimerini all condemned the Bush administration's decision along with left-leaning newspapers.

In Norway, a 2013 poll conducted by TNS Gallup found that 92% of those who vote for the Socialist Left Party and 89% of those who vote for the Liberal Party believe that global warming is caused by humans, while the percentage who held this belief is 60% among voters for the Conservative Party and 41% among voters for the Progress Party.

The shared sentiments between the political left and right on climate change further illustrate the divide in perception between the United States and Europe on climate change. As an example, conservative German Prime Ministers Helmut Kohl and Angela Merkel have differed with other parties in Germany only on "how to meet emissions reduction targets, not whether or not to establish or fulfill them."

Ideology
In the United States, ideology is an effective predictor of party identification, where conservatives are more prevalent among Republicans, and moderates and liberals among independents and Democrats. A shift in ideology is often associated with in a shift in political views. For example, when the number of conservatives rose from 2008 to 2009, the number of individuals who felt that global warming was being exaggerated in the media also rose.
Did you ever notice your name implies that you "bait" children into your "Jedi-van"?
 

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
awww, now he's running away from his own stupid, indefensible beliefs.













so tell us more about how 34 national academies of science are just engaging in a "hoax".

:lol:

don't run away from your own indefensible claims, blockhead. be proud! you are so smart and know way better than the world's leading climate scientists!
Not running away from anything, I continue to embrace my WELL-KNOWN position that the claim that man is a significant cause of any change in the climate is a complete fabrication.

I just wanted to see you dash off and round up a bunch of my quotes to prove what ANY member of RIU that frequents the Politics section already knows, while I went off and watched a movie.

Dance for me Hannity, dance for me. You are nothing, if not predictable.
 

DonAlejandroVega

Well-Known Member
throw the thermometer out the window. look at cadmium, lead, PCB, and arsenic levels in the environment since the beginning of the Industrial Age. look at air quality in developing countries, along with the illnesses caused by it. we are fucking this place up. y'all will be wearing gas masks at your comps, and still be typin' away. hopefully ebola will go airborne long before then............
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
throw the thermometer out the window. look at cadmium, lead, PCB, and arsenic levels in the environment since the beginning of the Industrial Age. look at air quality in developing countries, along with the illnesses caused by it. we are fucking this place up. y'all will be wearing gas masks at your comps, and still be typin' away. hopefully ebola will go airborne long before then............
Thankfully the people of those shitty countries absorb most of them for us, like a filter on a cigarette, so we'll be fine.

Do you really give a fuck if some Chinese family beside a coal plant has a shitty quality of life?

Just like Milumpa from Malawi who has to walk a 4 hour round trip to get water everyday...move your fucking mudhut closer to the well, it is a mudhut you made from sticks and mud according to the Charity's advertisement.
 
Top