lifegoesonbrah
Well-Known Member
I am not an absolutist, I think compromise is important considering 90% of the population does not support the freedom philosophy. I think we should fight the small battles in reducing the deficit and maximizing liberty under the current system. This is ultimately where we disagree.You are ignoring your own contradiction. You can't be "for freedom" and then use "unfree methods" and expect this will work. THAT is impractical.
"We" shouldn't allow or disallow business to do anything, as long as they aren't using coercive methods.
I think "we" should untie the market and untie people, so the parties involved can make up their minds how they will trade their labor. You are still trying to polish a turd and think it will not be a turd if you can just vote the stink away. It will not happen, coercion based "solutions" may appear to "solve" problems on the surface, but they bring unintended consequences and negate freedom. Monetary reform? How so?
As far as monetary reform, I believe in a backed currency and decentralized banking to be the future.