Trolls B. S. rep

darkdestruction420

darkdestruction420

Well-Known Member
darkdestruction420 said:
indeed, i am one of them:cry:. ludacris i owe u an apology cuz i said it was good when you got banned when I thought you were the one who made all the offensive reps from a 2nd account that i thought you created for that purpose. the first offensive reps said ludacris#1 at the end of the bad part and i thought it was ludacris *signing* the rep from his 2nd account so he didnt get his main account banned for leaving them offensive reps and that rollitup figured it out somehow and banned all his accounts. ive gotten 7 myself in the last 2 dayskiss-asssorry luda.
Click to expand...
darkdestruction420 said:
it also expains why i was wondering why luda went from being one of the coolest guys on here to being a dickhead all of the sudden for no reason. thats what bugged me the most. i couldnt figure out why ludacris betrayed me for no reason when i always considered us good freinds,
it hurt my feelings in a way.

mods unban ludacris! or is it just a temporary warning ban and he'll get it back soon?
(i know its not luda and that he didnt betray me now btw)
Click to expand...
just wanted to make sure luda notices these post since he probally doesnt feel like going through all the old posts on the thread and its very important to me that he see's it....
 
morgentaler

morgentaler

Well-Known Member
From what I gather the ability to have Reputation display the sender is part of the Elite permissions. Is this correct?

I would suggest changing that one item from Elite to default, as it would probably lessen the trolling done through anonymous reps.

I just received a nonsense post to my rep, with apparently the only intention being to badmouth Ludacris.

I don't have any opinion on Luda as I do now know him. But I don't find it especially sensible for the rep system to be configured the way it is when there's such an obvious issue with trolls.

It's just a ranking system. But in it's current configuration it's an anonymous slander system, and potentially a way for new users to be tricked into reporting abuses because they won't understand that the name of the person associated with the rep has been added by the poster himself.

Anyway, just two cent o' mine.

Cheers.
 
CrackerJax

CrackerJax

New Member
I agree..... if you want to post a positive rep... anonymous is just fine... ur choice.

Neg reps should be signed however. I've never given one, but you can bet I would GLADLY leave my name... :wink:

Butch up if/when you neg rep.
 
Wikidbchofthewst

Wikidbchofthewst

Well-Known Member
morgentaler said:
From what I gather the ability to have Reputation display the sender is part of the Elite permissions. Is this correct?

I would suggest changing that one item from Elite to default, as it would probably lessen the trolling done through anonymous reps.

I just received a nonsense post to my rep, with apparently the only intention being to badmouth Ludacris.

I don't have any opinion on Luda as I do now know him. But I don't find it especially sensible for the rep system to be configured the way it is when there's such an obvious issue with trolls.

It's just a ranking system. But in it's current configuration it's an anonymous slander system, and potentially a way for new users to be tricked into reporting abuses because they won't understand that the name of the person associated with the rep has been added by the poster himself.

Anyway, just two cent o' mine.

Cheers.
Click to expand...
I agree, it would solve a lot of problems if people couldn't anonymously talk shit through the rep system.

CrackerJax said:
I agree..... if you want to post a positive rep... anonymous is just fine... ur choice.

Neg reps should be signed however. I've never given one, but you can bet I would GLADLY leave my name... :wink:

Butch up if/when you neg rep.
Click to expand...
That would help with people who leave anonymous neg rep, but it wouldn't really make a difference to the trolling, because the troll is leaving positive rep (it comes up neutral because they don't have enough rep themselves, but it's a positive rep)
 
Wikidbchofthewst

Wikidbchofthewst

Well-Known Member
I wonder...if a newb whose rep wasn't worth anything yet became Elite and tried to neg rep...would it be a neutral rep too? I imagine it would....but I don't think a troll would waste the money on becoming Elite under a user name that's just going to be banned.
 
PeachOibleBoiblePeach#1

PeachOibleBoiblePeach#1

Well-Known Member
CrackerJax said:
I agree..... if you want to post a positive rep... anonymous is just fine... ur choice.

Neg reps should be signed however. I've never given one, but you can bet I would GLADLY leave my name... :wink:

Butch up if/when you neg rep.
Click to expand...
Welcome Back:mrgreen:, This was a great thread for me, It actually made me feel Like a part of the RIU community and really makes me think before I post, That's all Good. and to the Mods listening:peace: and good saving a innocent member. CJ,Wikid,,and everyone Smokebongsmilie:eyesmoke: I'm high on aged pure power:eyesmoke:
 
LUDACRIS

LUDACRIS

New Member
CrackerJax said:
So....... you have run down "someone's" cat then eh? :mrgreen:

Ba da Dum....
Click to expand...

and it was more like a speed bump my car seat lifted and it sounded more like a thump thump and then eeeeeeeeeeeee.
dam brakes failed again or maybe i forgot to stomp on the pedal :lol:

CHRIS.
:mrgreen:
 
CrackerJax

CrackerJax

New Member
Always use reverse to make sure they're dead...... unless the dog has a leash and an old lady holding the other end.
 
LUDACRIS

LUDACRIS

New Member
CrackerJax said:
Always use reverse to make sure they're dead...... unless the dog has a leash and an old lady holding the other end.
Click to expand...


R.O.F.L.M.F.A.O.

use reverse ????? never i just do donuts and spin right back round again and fuck using the brakes either :lol:.
i removed all my mirrors so they dont distract me.



CHRIS.
:mrgreen:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top