Trolls B. S. rep

Wikidbchofthewst · Oct 4, 2009

moash said:
as u can see he was dealt with
what part of he has done it before when we got into it before that u dont understand
u want proof....i showed what he did.....thats y its done like that so there is none
ur right i did call him out.....cuz all he does is start shit.....i was gonna post something that had to do with the thread til i saw what he was doin
go back and read everything he post.....nothing helpful,just bs
go ahead and defend him if u want.....i know hes a smuck

He was banned because he kept PMing fdd over this stalker shit and fdd got frustrated.

If he's harassed you before, you still have yet to provide any proof. I hope you at least reported the posts.

I'm getting tired of people who want to bitch about shit that goes on on the forums, but at the same time refuse to report it. Makes no sense.

Wikidbchofthewst · Oct 4, 2009

Dr. Greenhorn said:
ASk Luda I'd you want your proof

HOW WHEN HE'S BEEN BANNED?

And why would LUDA provide proof that he's a troll?

You make the accusations, it's your job to back up the shit you're talking, or stfu.

Dr. Greenhorn · Oct 4, 2009

aNd I better unsubscribe before I get Another pussy ass infraction ,,, laterZ

Dr. Greenhorn · Oct 4, 2009

And get off the crack pipe, it's time to mimi

moash · Oct 4, 2009

Wikidbchofthewst said:
He was banned because he kept PMing fdd over this stalker shit and fdd got frustrated.

If he's harassed you before, you still have yet to provide any proof. I hope you at least reported the posts.

I'm getting tired of people who want to bitch about shit that goes on on the forums, but at the same time refuse to report it. Makes no sense.

who said i was bitching......
i was just stating that he was a troll...
ur the one who keeps askin questions about it....i showed what i had for proof and y it was done that way and ur the one who cant accept the fact

Wikidbchofthewst · Oct 4, 2009

moash said:
who said i was bitching......
i was just stating that he was a troll...
ur the one who keeps askin questions about it....i showed what i had for proof and y it was done that way and ur the one who cant accept the fact

I just think that you should have to back your accusations up with some kind of EVIDENCE.

So far, all you posted was a bunch of harassing rep messages left by Ludacris's stalker, and a thread in which YOU started a confrontation with Ludacris...not really doing much to prove your accusation that HE'S a troll :roll:

If you're going to accuse someone of something, you have to provide the proof that they are what you're saying they are. If you can't provide that proof, but continue to make said accusations, you're really just talking shit. Baseless shit at that :roll:

I'm not especially close to Ludacris, I don't know him any better than I know most people here, I don't read all his posts or see everything he does. You could very well be RIGHT, I'm just asking that you prove it.

I've never seen him harass anyone but his own stalker. Other than that I've seen his stalker trying to stir up a lot of shit.

dew-b · Oct 4, 2009

fdd2blk said:
nope, all day long they hate on me. then ask why i'm pissy, even though i'm not.

it must be a genaration thing part of the genaration -x way of thinking, i think you do a great job fdd just jam to some metalica play the 4 horsemen. then play ronnie.then end with sanitarem rock on brother bevis bongsmilie

KaleoXxX · Oct 4, 2009

i never read anything posted by (real(well not the real rapper but not the troll either(actually it could be the rapper...))) ludacris to make me believe he was anything less than helpful

Wikidbchofthewst · Oct 4, 2009

KaleoXxX said:
i never read anything posted by (real(well not the real rapper but not the troll either(actually it could be the rapper...))) to make me believe he was anything less than helpful

Me neither. All I've heard is "he left me a neg rep" which means his STALKER left someone a neutral rep. No one has shown me any proof that Ludacris himself is a bad member.

moash · Oct 4, 2009

Wikidbchofthewst said:
I just think that you should have to back your accusations up with some kind of EVIDENCE.

So far, all you posted was a bunch of harassing rep messages left by Ludacris's stalker, and a thread in which YOU started a confrontation with Ludacris...not really doing much to prove your accusation that HE'S a troll

If you're going to accuse someone of something, you have to provide the proof that they are what you're saying they are. If you can't provide that proof, but continue to make said accusations, you're really just talking shit. Baseless shit at that

I'm not especially close to Ludacris, I don't know him any better than I know most people here, I don't read all his posts or see everything he does. You could very well be RIGHT, I'm just asking that you prove it.

I've never seen him harass anyone but his own stalker. Other than that I've seen his stalker trying to stir up a lot of shit.

we'll just leave it at that....
ive told u he has done it before when i got into argumments with him before....i find it hard to believe that a troll would do this only when we get into it
when a mod can come on and tell me they didnt come from ludas ip address,then ill believe it
but really i could care less,i just wanted to get the word out
latas

Wikidbchofthewst · Oct 4, 2009

moash said:
we'll just leave it at that....
ive told u he has done it before when i got into argumments with him before....i find it hard to believe that a troll would do this only when we get into it

Getting into an argument with you doesn't make Ludacris a TROLL :roll:

And still, without providing proof, your accusations mean nothing.

And are you trying to say you don't believe it's the troll leaving you those rep messages? Do you not understand how the rep system works?

Minimum Reputation Count
How much reputation must a user have before his reputation hits count on others?
100

THIS PROVES THAT IT'S NOT LUDACRIS BECAUSE LUDACRIS'S REPS WOULDN'T SHOW UP AS NEUTRAL

Daily Reputation Clicks Limit
How many reputation clicks can a user give over each 24 hour period? Administrators are exempt from this limit.
3

THIS PROVES THAT IT'S NOT LUDACRIS BECAUSE LUDACRIS WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO REP 30 PEOPLE IN A SINGLE DAY TO BE ABLE TO REP YOU AGAIN SO SOON AFTER HAVING JUST REPPED YOU

Reputation User Spread
How many different users must you give reputation to before you can hit the same person again?
30

THIS PROVES THAT IT'S NOT LUDACRIS BECAUSE LUDACRIS WOULD HAVE TO REP 30 PEOPLE BEFORE HE COULD REP YOU AGAIN...WHICH WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE TO DO THAT QUICKLY.

Wikidbchofthewst · Oct 4, 2009

moash said:
when a mod can come on and tell me they didnt come from ludas ip address,then ill believe it
but really i could care less,i just wanted to get the word out
latas

Mods can't access your account and see your rep, so that's never going to happen. You just need to use common sense and the rules of the rep system to realize the truth :roll:

https://www.rollitup.org/support/29103-rep-system-information.html

That info on the rep system was posted by rollitup himself, if that helps you any

moash · Oct 4, 2009

Wikidbchofthewst said:
Mods can't access your account and see your rep, so that's never going to happen. You just need to use common sense and the rules of the rep system to realize the truth

https://www.rollitup.org/support/29103-rep-system-information.html

That info on the rep system was posted by rollitup himself, if that helps you any

im sure there r certain mods that can access that stuff,along with the pm's
u should be a mod...u sure do seem to think u know everything about this site :roll:

kiss-ass

CrackerJax · Oct 4, 2009

if you receive a rep..... and the giver is anonymous..... unless you are elite, you have no idea who it is. So the comment IN the rep message cannot be trusted.

See... I could neg rep you anonymously, but then leave a comment that would "make" you think it was from , oh, let's say Wikid (purely an example).

It is easy to make an anonymous rep and then leave a "trail" in the comment.

A dishonest trail. But how would you know? You don't.

Wikidbchofthewst · Oct 4, 2009

moash said:
im sure there r certain mods that can access that stuff,along with the pm's
u should be a mod...u sure do seem to think u know everything about this sitekiss-ass

Oh, you're sure of that are you? :roll:

And are you seriously trying to talk shit about the fact that I know more about this site than you? LOL, sorry that I read and retain information, and then use it to PWN you in an argument :lol:

CrackerJax said:
if you receive a rep..... and the giver is anonymous..... unless you are elite, you have no idea who it is. So the comment IN the rep message cannot be trusted.

See... I could neg rep you anonymously, but then leave a comment that would "make" you think it was from , oh, let's say Wikid (purely an example).

It is easy to make an anonymous rep and then leave a "trail" in the comment.

A dishonest trail. But how would you know? You don't.

*Wikid clings to CrackerJax as the only other voice of reason in this thread*

moash · Oct 4, 2009

CrackerJax said:
if you receive a rep..... and the giver is anonymous..... unless you are elite, you have no idea who it is. So the comment IN the rep message cannot be trusted.

See... I could neg rep you anonymously, but then leave a comment that would "make" you think it was from , oh, let's say Wikid (purely an example).

It is easy to make an anonymous rep and then leave a "trail" in the comment.

A dishonest trail. But how would you know? You don't.

i was elite before
and would be now if the site was working.....so i do know it was him before......get me now

moash · Oct 4, 2009

Oh, you're sure of that are you?

r u?.............
nothing on the computer is confidential

Wikidbchofthewst · Oct 4, 2009

moash said:
r u?.............
nothing on the computer is confidential

I believe it can be accessed, but not by the mods. They have repeatedly stated that they cannot access anyone else's reps or pms.

In this very thread fdd posted

fdd2blk said:
i do NOT have access to rep, i ma sorry. you will have to wait for rollitup to reply, he is the only one with access to rep.

Are you calling him a liar?

So if rollitup is the only one who can see your reps, you really think the owner of the site should sit here and verify for everyone who asks that their random neutral reps are NOT from ludacris? When anyone with common sense and knowledge of the rep system can figure it out themselves?

moash · Oct 4, 2009

Wikidbchofthewst said:
I believe it can be accessed, but not by the mods. They have repeatedly stated that they cannot access anyone else's reps or pms.

In this very thread fdd posted

Are you calling him a liar?

So if rollitup is the only one who can see your reps, you really think the owner of the site should sit here and verify for everyone who asks that their random neutral reps are NOT from ludacris? When anyone with common sense and knowledge of the rep system can figure it out themselves?

no(thought rollitup was a mod)
but thanks for proving my point
they can be read
and u act like im asking a mod to do that....i could care less
im done talkin,ur skull is too thick

Wikidbchofthewst · Oct 4, 2009

moash said:
im done talkin

Thank god

Trolls B. S. rep

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member