http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp=22887506�
TreesOfLife Well-Known Member Aug 5, 2009 #1 http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp=22887506�
ViRedd New Member Aug 5, 2009 #2 These are the same people who voted against Robert Bork and Clarence Thomas. Hell, they didn't just vote against Bork & Thomas ... they tried to destroy the men. For what reason? Because they are strict constitutionlists. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLlZceRyxe4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QwiQlx8W2R8
These are the same people who voted against Robert Bork and Clarence Thomas. Hell, they didn't just vote against Bork & Thomas ... they tried to destroy the men. For what reason? Because they are strict constitutionlists. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLlZceRyxe4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QwiQlx8W2R8
what... huh? Active Member Aug 5, 2009 #3 Are you suggesting Sotomayor is a strict constitutionalist?
Operation 420 Well-Known Member Aug 5, 2009 #4 what... huh? said: Are you suggesting Sotomayor is a strict constitutionalist? Click to expand... No, he's saying the people Bush nominated were. He nominated minorities too, but the Libs don't want people to know that now. Clarence Thomas was a Freemason, so I don't really give a shit, but they try to make you think they're the "Race Uniters", by getting her in now.
what... huh? said: Are you suggesting Sotomayor is a strict constitutionalist? Click to expand... No, he's saying the people Bush nominated were. He nominated minorities too, but the Libs don't want people to know that now. Clarence Thomas was a Freemason, so I don't really give a shit, but they try to make you think they're the "Race Uniters", by getting her in now.
FilthyFletch Mr I Can Do That For Half Aug 5, 2009 #5 Sotomayor just may be like Michelle a racist...oh my god he called them racist..yes i did