The Democrats "Ron Paul Moment"

UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
hey mr. neutered, you're going to have to take down that sig pretty soon. rawn pawl is retiring and randy weber is all but certain to replace him. you wouldn't like the guy:

[h=3]Sponsored legislation[/h]
  • HB 4009 - Relating to the provision of services to certain persons involved in, and the prosecution, punishment, and prevention of, offenses involving trafficking of persons or certain forced or sex-based labor or services, and to law enforcement training related to offenses involving that trafficking.

http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/Randy_Weber
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Mr Neutron said:
I know, she's loud, huh? Tell you what, next time she starts screaming just kick her in the ribs, that always shuts her up for me.
Click to expand...
sorry buddy, my wife isn't a hooker, so that rules out any possibility that you could ever get anywhere near her.

enjoy your brown schwag!
 
deprave

deprave

New Member
Dr Kynes said:
and anarchist will froth at the mouth throw bombs at baby carriages and shoot Theodore Roosevelt in the chest for giving a speech in favor of freedom.

nationalists can paint with a broad brush too.

but then youre not REALLY an anarchist. you just swallowed the lie that anarchism is a political theory, rather than Grand Theft Auto, Streets of Mogadishu.

on the issue at hand, i've said it many times, both parties are just professional wrestling, they strut and fret, and throw each other about for a few minutes to an hour, then all run off to a steakhouse and sit down together to celebrate another fine performance of the theater of the absurd.
Click to expand...
case and point, a fine example you have provided, statism is not true freedom for the serfs.

Sorry I just don't believe in the idea that the state is needed to keep law and order. I really don't believe that a monopoly on power unaccountable for its actions either attracts good nor works in our interest, I question if this evil is necessary or if any evil is necessary.
 
Dr Kynes

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
deprave said:
case and point, a fine example you have provided, statism is not true freedom for the serfs.

Sorry I just don't believe in the idea that the state is needed to keep law and order. I really don't believe that a monopoly on power unaccountable for its actions either attracts good nor works in our interest, I question if this evil is necessary or if any evil is necessary.
Click to expand...
and i lack the confidence in the common sense, goodwill and honesty of other people to trust the hoi polloi with total freedom to do as they please without some authority standing above with the headsman's axe.

most "stateless societies" devolve into anarchy (real anarchy, the chaotic type filled with violence not the trendy utopian type) and most people selling a "stateless society" or using the word "statist" are just disguising their real plans for a single one-world government even less accountable, and more overbearing than the multiple nation states currently arguing over the acceptable level of oppression, (north korea, cuba and some parts of china excepted, those assholes got domination on lock-lock) and of course with a single one world dominion, you cant even flee to another country where you might be less oppressed. we're gonna need rocket ships.

thats the problem with anarcho-ists. they dont have a political theory, a phgilosophy or an idea, they just want to watch the world burn, or they are weepy eyed dreamers who think that somalia is just experiencing "growing pains" (insert Kirk Cameron jokes here) as it mocves towards the stateless anarcho-______________ism that they personally hold as the ideal.

protip: somalia is gonna continue circling the drain till it is gobbled up by a neighbor, is conquered by one of the warlords or sinks into the sea.
 
deprave

deprave

New Member
Dr Kynes said:
and i lack the confidence in the common sense, goodwill and honesty of other people to trust the hoi polloi with total freedom to do as they please without some authority standing above with the headsman's axe.

most "stateless societies" devolve into anarchy (real anarchy, the chaotic type filled with violence not the trendy utopian type) and most people selling a "stateless society" or using the word "statist" are just disguising their real plans for a single one-world government even less accountable, and more overbearing than the multiple nation states currently arguing over the acceptable level of oppression, (north korea, cuba and some parts of china excepted, those assholes got domination on lock-lock) and of course with a single one world dominion, you cant even flee to another country where you might be less oppressed. we're gonna need rocket ships.

thats the problem with anarcho-ists. they dont have a political theory, a phgilosophy or an idea, they just want to watch the world burn, or they are weepy eyed dreamers who think that somalia is just experiencing "growing pains" (insert Kirk Cameron jokes here) as it mocves towards the stateless anarcho-______________ism that they personally hold as the ideal.

protip: somalia is gonna continue circling the drain till it is gobbled up by a neighbor, is conquered by one of the warlords or sinks into the sea.
Click to expand...
somalia is in a state of war, did you channel cheesus with that comment?


Now your saying anyone who uses the word statist, REALLY has a conspiracy to form a one-world government?!?! Really your saying that anti- authoritarianism people are really just authoritarians in disguise?

I think that a more believable conspiracy theory would be that lizard people hailing from planet zytor in the nexicon 3 galaxy are in control of the NWO and poisoning our water supply.

Where do you come up with this stuff? No wonder you are capable of justifying crimes of ethics and morality against the human race by those in power...You could justify child murder with your irrelevant ramblings. Oh wait you already did...
 
Dr Kynes

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
deprave said:
somalia is in a state of war, did you channel cheesus with that comment?


Now your saying anyone who uses the word statist, REALLY has a conspiracy to form a one-world government?!?! Really your saying that anti- authoritarianism people are really just authoritarians in disguise?

I think that a more believable conspiracy theory would be that lizard people hailing from planet zytor in the nexicon 3 galaxy are in control of the NWO and poisoning our water supply.

Where do you come up with this stuff? No wonder you are capable of justifying crimes of ethics and morality against the human race by those in power...You could justify child murder with your irrelevant ramblings. Oh wait you already did...
Click to expand...
no, im saying those who use "statist" as their scarlet letter to mark and defame all who arent ready to embrace the joys of anarcho-barbarism are almost invariably leftist marxist agitators and agent provocateurs using new code words since "proletariat", "bourgeois", and "imperialist crypto-fascist" just dont sell pamphlets like they used to, so they have adopted and co-opted the pre-marxist language for the same bullshit marx branded and marketed to the russian peasantry after it sat on the shelf in pre-war germany. (pre ww1 that is, in the 1920's hitler repackaged marxism specifically for the german market, and made a killing) anarcho-_________ism is just a shiny new box with olde timey graphics, and a fresh marketing campaign for the same old garbage.

MOST people have proven themselves too clever, or at least to politically disinterested to jump on board the new hotness that is anarcho-_____________ism, but theres always a sucker or two ready to put a $20 on the box and take his luck at finding the red queen. thats how the hucksters stay in business.

furthermore, Somalia is NOT in a state of war. Somalia is now just a name on the map, with borders assigned by the UN. whatever nation-state develops from the anarcho-morass that is currently anarcho-seething within the anarcho-borders of anarcho-somalia, the UN will rubber stamp it and accept it as legitimate, just like they did with north korea, kosovo, and numerous other anarcho-states. as long as the anarcho- stays within the established borders, the UN doesnt give a fuck. if a neighbor installs a puppet regime, or one of the warlords comes out on top, thats fine with the UN, only if a neighbor attempts to subsume somalia, or somebody attempts to invade will the UN give a shit about the anarcho-plight of anarcho-somalians, and for once i am inclined to agree with the UN.

Fuck Somalia. Dumbasses played themselves. They can suck a mountain of cocks.

i dont justify shit done by any nation. if you dont like the country you're in, change it, or leave (if possible) but when your sittin in a country that gives you the right to vote for the change you want, or pack up and move out if you like, then your bitching is useless whining.

if your "ideas" of a nationless anarcho-peacnik state of peace love and understanding had any fucking traction with any significant portion of the populace we would already be living in your utopia. here in america you have remarkable freedom to do as you please. you could start a commune, join an existing one, become an amish quilt maker, or even pack up and move to the alaskan wilderness, or even just drop out of society like so many have (and still do) since the 60's and live the beatnik hippie lifestyle of a traveling weed salesman, vagabond and Grateful Dead tribute band's drummer. sounds like a great anarcho-deal for an anarcho-libertine, or anarcho-dreamer.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top