Tea Party

Prefontaine

Well-Known Member
Your comments is proof enough and that video is from Hannity on fixed news...which means nothing. Just like your token blacks there are token Latinos also. If you believe in the Tea party rhetoric then anyone can be elected
So the rascism of the tea party is being intentionally hidden from the world by using minority figureheads to distract from their rascist intentions?

oh and if you actually read a histroy book you would know that I am correct about the origins of the KKK.
 

c.h.u.d.

Active Member
So the rascism of the tea party is being intentionally hidden from the world by using minority figureheads to distract from their rascist intentions?

oh and if you actually read a histroy book you would know that I am correct about the origins of the KKK.
Yes I read Wikipedia
 

dukeanthony

New Member
Well since you know so much about the KKK you would also know that Nixon Used the "southern strategy" after Lyndon Johnson pissed off all the racist Dixecrats by passing the Civil Rights act and the Voting rights act

The Racist democrats went over to the Republican party and have been there ever since

They were in our Camp We kicked them out.

They are your boys now....Enjoy
 

Prefontaine

Well-Known Member
Funny how none of that has anything to do with your claim that the tea party is lynching black people, and also funny how the tea party is made up of more independents than anything else, and if you actually did any research you would see that the tea party caucus which is what you must be referring to actually has little to nothing to do with the tea party as defined below in an exert from wikipedia

An article in Politico stated that many Tea Party activists see the caucus as an effort by the Republican Party to hijack the movement. Utah congressman Jason Chaffetz refused to join the caucus, saying "Structure and formality are the exact opposite of what the Tea Party is, and if there is an attempt to put structure and formality around it, or to co-opt it by Washington, D.C., it’s going to take away from the free-flowing nature of the true tea party movement."[6]
In an attempt to quell fears that Washington insiders were attempting to co-opt the Tea Party movement, Rep Michele Bachmann stated "We're not the mouthpiece. We are not taking the Tea Party and controlling it from Washington, D.C. We are also not here to vouch for the Tea Party or to vouch for any Tea Party organizations or to vouch for any individual people or actions, or billboards or signs or anything of the Tea Party. We are the receptacle."[7] [8]
Additionally, Senators Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania and Marco Rubio of Florida, all Tea Party supporters, refused to join the caucus.[9][10] Toomey said he would be "open" to joining, and spoke at the first meeting, but did not ultimately join.[11] Johnson said that he declined to join because he wanted to "work towards a unified Republican Conference, so that's where I will put my energy."[12] Rubio criticized the caucus, saying "My fear has always been that if you start creating these little clubs or organizations in Washington run by politicians, the movement starts to lose its energy."[13]

I bet you all think Cheney's new "grass roots" movement is much more legitimate than a movement by the people which later received funding and support from various people attempting to gain from the momentum themselves.

still not the same as lynching blacks and burning crosses in peoples yards. maybe instead of standing up for the constitution which is the defining document of our country we should just max out another credit card? oh thats right more debt will save us...................
 

Prefontaine

Well-Known Member
once again you show your lack of intelligence by trying to make this a partisan argument, but it is not, you see we are not in a two party system, we have a system of government that has been hijacked by an elite few, this elite few maintain power by playing the populous against one another, hence two parties,
 

Prefontaine

Well-Known Member
maybe if you learned to think analytically you would be able to sift through the Bull shit and recognize "spin" but until then you will be blindly led to slaughter
 

c.h.u.d.

Active Member
once again you show your lack of intelligence by trying to make this a partisan argument, but it is not, you see we are not in a two party system, we have a system of government that has been hijacked by an elite few, this elite few maintain power by playing the populous against one another, hence two parties,
WoW you got me there. I am at a lose for words.
maybe if you learned to think analytically you would be able to sift through the Bull shit and recognize "spin" but until then you will be blindly led to slaughter


You got me on that 1 too
 

munch box

Well-Known Member
The tea Party gets the blame because there is not a powerful enouph republican to put all the blame on. Democrats need somebody blame because they can not run on thier record of failed policy. Every once in a while there are still some ultra liberals that think everything obama is doing wrong must be Bush's fault.
 

Prefontaine

Well-Known Member
oh and as for josh hamilton, of course he got more attention than the non drug addict, its called overcoming adversity, makes for a more interesting story than someone who has no hurdles to overcome
 

Prefontaine

Well-Known Member
The tea Party gets the blame because there is not a powerful enouph republican to put all the blame on. Democrats need somebody blame because they can not run on thier record of failed policy. Every once in a while there are still some ultra liberals that think everything obama is doing wrong must be Bush's fault.
Thought you might like to know that obamas medical law, has already been found to be unconstitutional by lower courts so its on its way to the supreme court eventually.
 

c.h.u.d.

Active Member
The tea Party gets the blame because there is not a powerful enouph republican to put all the blame on. Democrats need somebody blame because they can not run on thier record of failed policy. Every once in a while there are still some ultra liberals that think everything obama is doing wrong must be Bush's fault.
Yea but realize most of these problems was inherited from the Bush administration. When bush took office there was a 5 trillion dollar debt and when bush ended it was close to 9 trillion more. Something like that...
 

munch box

Well-Known Member
Thought you might like to know that obamas medical law, has already been found to be unconstitutional by lower courts so its on its way to the supreme court eventually.
you must be talking about the most recent court in atlanta. I think its the 3rd one overall, and won't be the last. Judges don't normally rule against eachother, so I expect judges in other states to follow suit and uphold the constitution in the future as well
 

Prefontaine

Well-Known Member
No, actually Obama took the headwork towards dictatorship that bush made, and ran with it, that is why we no longer have a 5 trillion dollar debt and instead have a 14.6 trillion dollar debt, yeah cause an inheritence usually triples when you get it?

or no wait its just these wars we are fighting. well actually we have been at war for what? 10 years now?

oh it was the recession and bailouts.. wait a minute most of those bailouts where loans that would be paid back right away weren't they? thats what i rmember the news telling us.

oh no its all the unemployed people, well washington had 10% unemployment during bush,

well it must be the tea party, well the teaparty isnt actually a controlling power in government and cant be linked to any direct spending
 
Top