ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
fuzzy math
and thanks for saying Obama has shrunk the goverment
State of the Union address
- Thread starter fb360
- Start date
and thanks for saying Obama has shrunk the goverment
Winter Woman
Well-Known Member
You mean Obama's fuzzy math.
Winter Woman
Well-Known Member
Here's some Obama math for you.
Taxpayers spent $1.4 billion dollars on everything from staffing, housing, flying and entertaining President Obama and his family last year, according to the author of a new book on taxpayer-funded presidential perks.
In comparison, British taxpayers spent just $57.8 million on the royal family.
Taxpayers spent $1.4 billion dollars on everything from staffing, housing, flying and entertaining President Obama and his family last year, according to the author of a new book on taxpayer-funded presidential perks.
In comparison, British taxpayers spent just $57.8 million on the royal family.
silasraven
Well-Known Member
even if his math is fuzzy, i still love 9 dollars an hour for mim wage
Samwell Seed Well
Well-Known Member
the royal family are all filthy rich, born or married into wealth and its not their job to be the royal family, Obama is the president not a trust fund baby
not sure if that splits the hair enough but seems like apples and oranges to me, fuzzy . . more like moldy
nitro harley
Well-Known Member
Buck....
Patriots with guns ......Thats what made america....Did you forget about that?.......nitro..
Winter Woman
Well-Known Member
He sure spends it like he is a king. it is still $1.4 BILLION.
Justdewwit
Active Member
Smh...Obama this Obama that...shut up and grow your pot mufuka's go to Fox or CNN blog that..
blacksun
New Member
Funny that obama didn't mention chicago at all in his gun control speech.
Chicago had more gun violence last year than newtown AND aurora COMBINED.
Oh that's right, chicago also already has the "gun control" obama wants for the rest of the country.
That sounds really fucking smart....
/shrug
Chicago had more gun violence last year than newtown AND aurora COMBINED.
Oh that's right, chicago also already has the "gun control" obama wants for the rest of the country.
That sounds really fucking smart....
If you don't like politics being discussed in the politics section of RIU, then GTFO of the politics section of RIU?
/shrug
woody333333
Well-Known Member
over 500 murders in chicago last year... i dont no the numbers but i think thats the highest its beens since cabrini green came down
Thundercat
Well-Known Member
Not just Chicago look at DC, and New York LA all have strong gun laws and high murder rates. Guns don't kill people, people do very simple. I've recently watched several interviews that involved Pierce Morgan ( who is little more then a whiny child) and he is always talking about how low the gun crime is in England. He however never touches on the fact that as gun crime goes down, general violent crime (beatings, stabbings, and such) increases. This can be seen in those cities with strong gun laws, and in the other countries in the world that try to instate stronger gun control. An armed society is a polite society. Australian courts didn't even have a public definition for a "home invasion" on record until after they instated the gun ban several years back. Since then they have seen a decrease in gun violence, but a 20-50% increase across the board in other forms of violence, including having to define a "home invasion" so they could start charging people with them.
Totoe
Well-Known Member
Actually, he did at the end, when he mentioned the majorette who performed at his inauguration and was shot in a park located around a mile from his home in Chicago, but I understand that a lot of people were too busy seething with vitriole and feeding their paranoia to actually listen.
Totoe
Well-Known Member
Ok other types of violence goes up, but with these statistics which you allude to but do not source, does the murder rate go up or down? I can understand if rates of other violence go up because it seems logical that gun violence is an escalation of other types of violence. EG something such as a fight between opposing youth groups can escalate to gun play then gets written up as a gun violence statistic, but the whole battery part gets left off as inconsequential. Long story short; when gun violence goes down and other acts of violence such as battery go up, what is the correlary to the murder rate?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
how many coal miners die every year on average due to poorly regulated coal mines?
how many dollars in coal profits are worth the life of a fellow citizen?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
that was actually happening well before obama ever entered office, dumbass. and it was a result of a set of policies obama is trying his hardest to overturn.
still don't see that NHS style single payer, either.
you should probably not open your mouth, it removes all doubt and exposes you for the southern-educated moronic bigot that you are.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
so then, applying your ellipses logic to N&N's drunk on rubio logic, we need to get back to shooting at the government again?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
actually, people with guns kill people.
but thanks for displaying your cognitive dissonance through purposeful omission, and then condemning others for the same. the irony and hypocrisy is like a delicious afternoon treat for me.
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
Yeah, for those who study the communist manifesto. I only started learning to read when I was 8 years old.
Teaching grade school kids calculus and statistic methods, once only taught in university, in no way betters our children. It only confuses them with ideas beyond their developmental level.
nitro harley
Well-Known Member
Well only if we have too.........But I hope not........I would sell you one if we need too....Wont be cheap though..........nitro..