So much for maximum 150 gram carry.....

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member
I'm not sure you're reasoning is accurate. 150g of bud or 150g of oil or hash, as a finished product, will comply with the injunction ruling. Carrying around a couple of pounds of weed prior to it being converted wouldn't. IMO. Oh, and I'm very careful to ALWAYS carry 150g of weed to meet HC's minimum!
 

gb123

Well-Known Member
So much for "maximum" 150 gram carry....
I don't think they ever required us to carry a minimum of 150 grams :)
MMAR patients were told they can only have 150 gram carry. ooops... maximum minimum...:lol:
So 150 grams of oil now as well.
Makes the first point rather mute.


I forget there are only 40 thousand. :lol:
 
Last edited:

GrowRock

Well-Known Member
Hopefully we don't have to wait till February. Maybe the Supreme Court will see through the bs HC and the conservitives are selling and scrap the mmpr. A guy can only dream about this for now but it is looking like Johns going to have the upper hand if it goes to court in February. Kick some conservitive ass John

Peace

Oh ya chalk another one up for potheads everywhere lol
 

gb123

Well-Known Member
just kinda makes ya wonder....what they're gonna come up with next. At our expense!!!!!

I wonder what it's going to take, for them to realize they are loosing the battle... that shouldn't be a battle in the first place.:cuss:
 

WHATFG

Well-Known Member
just kinda makes ya wonder....what they're gonna come up with next. At our expense!!!!!

I wonder what it's going to take, for them to realize they are loosing the battle... that shouldn't be a battle in the first place.:cuss:
Till Haptlers last fucking breath!
 

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member
just kinda makes ya wonder....what they're gonna come up with next. At our expense!!!!!

I wonder what it's going to take, for them to realize they are loosing the battle... that shouldn't be a battle in the first place.:cuss:
I dunno...when the mmpr is struck down in Feb., I imagine some form of the mmar will be in play for a specified time while the government devises a new scheme. The problem for Harper, and the ace-in -the-hole for us, is he only has about 7 months from then before his ass is voted out. I can't see a whole lot of focus being put on mmj, when they are fighting for their political lives against a party and population that favours an end to prohibition. It's going to get interesting!
 

Jackal69

Well-Known Member
Hopefully we don't have to wait till February. Maybe the Supreme Court will see through the bs HC and the conservitives are selling and scrap the mmpr. A guy can only dream about this for now but it is looking like Johns going to have the upper hand if it goes to court in February. Kick some conservitive ass John

Peace

Oh ya chalk another one up for potheads everywhere lol
I doubt now they can scrap the mmpr or the LP's......many ppl actually need these LP's for medication even if it is shitty meds.

So sign up to a compassion club soon for emergency backup!!!!!!!!!
 

bigmanc

Well-Known Member
Ya LPs wont go anywhere but you will see some drop off the map, if the LP system goes down HC is going to be sued and tied up in court for the next 10 years.
 

MaryMaryMary

Well-Known Member
I doubt now they can scrap the mmpr or the LP's......many ppl actually need these LP's for medication even if it is shitty meds.

So sign up to a compassion club soon for emergency backup!!!!!!!!!
No way the MMPR will be scrapped lol, either they decide to just leave it like it is now (unlikely) or they will keep the MMPR and also allow small personal grows or something, and perhaps those who want a personal production license go through a procedure to get licensed

Ya LPs wont go anywhere but you will see some drop off the map, if the LP system goes down HC is going to be sued and tied up in court for the next 10 years.
the ones producing garbage year after year will definitely drop off the map, but anyone doing a good job should be fine... once the country goes fully legal, LP's are in a gold mine
 

WHATFG

Well-Known Member
Wouldn't it be something if it gets to the point where it is legal and a lot of people grow instead of buying then what? Lps be bitchin' about that too. I don't know why they don't see the power they have. Instead patients are left to fight the good fight and be guinea pigs for the current LP offerings. Shame on you Stephen!
 

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member
No way the MMPR will be scrapped lol, either they decide to just leave it like it is now (unlikely) or they will keep the MMPR and also allow small personal grows or something, and perhaps those who want a personal production license go through a procedure to get licensed

the ones producing garbage year after year will definitely drop off the map, but anyone doing a good job should be fine... once the country goes fully legal, LP's are in a gold mine
Hmmm...with the reputation they are currently building for themselves, once people are given an option I think the LP's future looks more like a coal mine.
 

j0yr1d3

Well-Known Member
When legalization occurs I think the LPs will do ok, depending on the model of legalization of course. There will always be those people that don't/won't/can't grow their own, whether it's time, space or mobility issues etc. Hopefully a more open market will actually see some LPs that can grow emerge and help prices drop. Also within a year they need to change some shit to allow extracts so I think some LPs will come up that will ONLY offer things like oils/creams/tinctures/hash/etc that way it doesn't really matter if they grow acres of garbage in their chocolate factories and green houses and retro fitted barns eh?
 

oddish

Well-Known Member
^ this.

Just look at the American model and you'll see what will likely happen here eventually.

Corporation helps to write legislation to legalize marijuana - they prove how it can be profitable for the government and the people. Then the government legalizes it and everyone makes money. Companies spring up that create product, some just create chocolates or other things - it all depends. There are companies that just buy wholesale medicine and create products out of it.

Things will change. Canada's hemp industry is expanding significantly as well and when they start extracting usable components from that then things will get murky again. Either way, they have to find a solution soon and it will probably be decriminalization and then legalization.
 
Just gonna bring this back to the 150g question.

The 150 gram personal possession limit as imposed by section 5(c) of the MMPR shall apply with respect to applicable licences as I was unconvinced that the Applicants would suffer irreparable
harm as a result of the imposition of this limit until trial. From Allard

The MMPR Regs the Allard decision references:

5. An individual who obtains dried marihuana for their own medical purposes or for those of another individual for whom they are responsible must not possess a quantity of dried marihuana that exceeds the least of the following amounts:

  • (a) in the case of dried marihuana obtained from a licensed producer, 30 times the daily quantity referred to in paragraph 129(1)(d);

  • (b) in the case of dried marihuana obtained from a hospital by or for an out-patient, 30 times the daily quantity referred to in subparagraph 65.2(c)(iii) of the Narcotic Control Regulations; and
  • (c) 150 g.
Because true extracts with no "dried marihuana" in them do not fall under the same category under the CDSA that the MMPR exempts patients from, its fair to say you can argue there is no carry limit for extracts/derivatives.

 

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member
Just gonna bring this back to the 150g question.

The 150 gram personal possession limit as imposed by section 5(c) of the MMPR shall apply with respect to applicable licences as I was unconvinced that the Applicants would suffer irreparable
harm as a result of the imposition of this limit until trial. From Allard

The MMPR Regs the Allard decision references:
5. An individual who obtains dried marihuana for their own medical purposes or for those of another individual for whom they are responsible must not possess a quantity of dried marihuana that exceeds the least of the following amounts:

  • (a) in the case of dried marihuana obtained from a licensed producer, 30 times the daily quantity referred to in paragraph 129(1)(d);

  • (b) in the case of dried marihuana obtained from a hospital by or for an out-patient, 30 times the daily quantity referred to in subparagraph 65.2(c)(iii) of the Narcotic Control Regulations; and
  • (c) 150 g.
Because true extracts with no "dried marihuana" in them do not fall under the same category under the CDSA that the MMPR exempts patients from, its fair to say you can argue there is no carry limit for extracts/derivatives.
Really? It was also fair for me to say a medical need could be used successfully as a defense. And it has. I provided precedent and examples of compassion clubs operating in this gray market .Can you provide evidence to prove your assumptions that there is no carry limit, or is your opinion just more valid,well, cause you're you? You were quick to jump to the defense of marijejane and the Maritime Moron accusing me of risking peoples liberty by posting my views, yet you turn around and do the exact same thing?
 
Top