Sam Dubose Murdered by Pig.

tightpockt

Well-Known Member
I was looking for the section where it said I had to submit to power hungry high school graduates...I couldn't find it. I do however have the bill of rights memorized...so there's that.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Yes. That's why he pulled his gun out, pointed it at his head and pulled the trigger, because he meant to shoot him, in the head.
How can you possibly know what the guy meant to do? You can't, that'll be the prosecution's job to try to prove that if they're going for a murder conviction. There's no way to prove that, that's why I think he'll get manslaughter
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
How can you possibly know what the guy meant to do? You can't, that'll be the prosecution's job to try to prove that if they're going for a murder conviction. There's no way to prove that, that's why I think he'll get manslaughter
See post 70.

"I think he meant to stop the guy, not kill him"

The problem with your opinion that he didn't mean to kill the guy, is that he pulled out his gun, pointed it at Sam Dubose's head and pulled the trigger.

Now excuse me while I go accidentally eat a sandwich.
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
How can you possibly know what the guy meant to do? You can't, that'll be the prosecution's job to try to prove that if they're going for a murder conviction. There's no way to prove that, that's why I think he'll get manslaughter
Negligent Homicide. Regardless of intent his actions led to the death of a person
 

doublejj

Well-Known Member
then tell me what else there is.
contact your local DMV for details, but pretty much stop & search any time they feel the need to for public safety, or other law enforcement purpose. Remember in most places they can detain you for 48hrs without charging you with anything.
 

Rrog

Well-Known Member
In at least three states, it is now illegal to record any on-duty police officer.
. Illinois, Massachusetts, and Maryland
I took a quick peek attar recent Illinois law referenced and it is not at all as cut and dry as your quote infers.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
contact your local DMV for details, but pretty much stop & search any time they feel the need to for public safety, or other law enforcement purpose. Remember in most places they can detain you for 48hrs without charging you with anything.
that's not under the implied consent law.
 

doublejj

Well-Known Member
Last edited:

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Be sure look up "Automobile Exception".....Courts generally give police more leeway to search a vehicle than a home. Under the "automobile exception" to the search warrant requirement, individuals have less of an expectation of privacy when driving a car. - See more at: http://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-rights/can-the-police-legitimately-search-my-vehicle-without-a-warrant.html#sthash.HqQbWnOH.dpuf
The ONLY place I have felt comfortable using my rights is: On My Property inside my house with a locked door between me and the police who don't have a warrant.

I had the cops inside my garage I was excercising my right not to talk to them. I got a ticket for Obstruction of Justice. I fought it. And surprisingly I won. It took 2 months and while the judge researched or whatever the hell she did but I got a not guilty verdict in the mail.
 

OddBall1st

Well-Known Member
Yes. That's why he pulled his gun out, pointed it at his head and pulled the trigger, because he meant to shoot him, in the head.
So he left his body cam on because....??? I would have let the lad go running away with his car,.. The stop was`nt a big deal and the danger level was low. He or the car owner will be found soon. It kinda looks like the kid knew he couldn`t be shot and wanted to exploit that to his advantage. At that point you take your chances that the cop isn`t trigger happy.

Kinda like,....nah nah you can`t shoot me ....Black lives matter.......
 
Top