Rocking CMH 315w &1000w MH/HPS

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Yeah. He was wondering how they made the 860's with the wattage restrictions they appear to have with the square wave. I was basically saying they didn't. The 860 is sine wave.
I said above there was a company that built a digital ballast- guessing square wave but I'm not sure- for the 860W CDM, but they went out of business fast. My guess is that the lamps couldn't handle the ballast's output and returns sank the company.
 

DirtyMcCurdy

Well-Known Member
I said above there was a company that built a digital ballast- guessing square wave but I'm not sure- for the 860W CDM, but they went out of business fast. My guess is that the lamps couldn't handle the ballast's output and returns sank the company.
My guess is they made a bunch of junk ballast that couldn't hold a consistent wave a would trash bulbs. Much like low quality, high frequency, digital ballast-can't hold a consistent wave at high frequencies and shortens bulb life and diminishes spectrum.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
My guess is they made a bunch of junk ballast that couldn't hold a consistent wave a would trash bulbs. Much like low quality, high frequency, digital ballast-can't hold a consistent wave at high frequencies and shortens bulb life and diminishes spectrum.
That, or like Philips has said, it's tough to keep a stable arc at high wattage with this tech and digital ballasts won't cut it for CMH lamps this big.
 
Top