Discussion in 'Advanced Marijuana Cultivation' started by torontoke, Aug 9, 2017.
Hopefully that's an explanation...but I'd expect High not drunk
I induced and maintained flowering with 14/10 with 2 diferwnt kush strains.
I been using the 'gas lantern routine' for veg =12 on 5.5 off , 1 hour on & 5.5 off, then switch to 11/13 for flowering and elsewhere I've got another grow on 20/4 veg & 11/13 flowering. Both are doing fine.. happy growing
Awesome, and have you experienced this fabled loss of THC content from less than 12 hours of light?
Not just "No" but "HELL NO!"
Not that I've noticed..
Do you have any documented research to prove what you say?
Nope! Just your uneducated "feelings."
How about you test your "feelings" in a lab, and then get back to us.
Until then, let's hear some more of your "feelings."
Where’s your lab results?
Maybe post anything remotely close to the numbers you claim before expecting it from others.
We understand your standing by your book that was written before hid lighting was even used but seriously why bother posting in this thread if it’s just going to be a pissed off granny mod rant.
This is exactly the reason more and more people are leaving these forums.
No sense trying to help get any new stats or opinions let’s just continue to measure dicks and sling insults like the petty mods do
If there’s no conversation to be had here then why bother?
In my first post was a quote by Dr. Clarke that started "research has shown." Then he cited the source.
"before hid lighting was even used," HA! that gave me a really good laugh! I imagine that you were not even born when Rob published his research, so you would not know about the use of HID lights.
Let's hear some more of your "feelings."
I won’t attempt to debate someone’s 40 year old research that isn’t even your own.
Clearly genetics and light tech haven’t changed at all since then so the same blanket data must stay true forever.
Everyone else must be wasting their time
None of us would be able to tell our end product is missing a measly 50% of the thc because we aren’t as old as you
That's absolutely correct, now you're talking! You are threatened by my knowledge and experience.
So it's time for me to thank you, and tell you how much I appreciate your growing skills. Because of that every time someone smokes my bud, they say it's the best they've ever had!
Documented research? Like from back when we were supposedly going into another ice age? Sorry but I'll side with lab results that test in the 30's and outdoor grows that finish with much less than 12 hours of light that test higher than the same clone indoors. There's a lot of experienced growers here and none of them are agreeing with you or your fairy tale unicorn voodoo research.
Today at work I had trouble. I went to the toilet in a nearby restaurant and it felt like I was having a number one from my number two, but the type of number one experienced after you've fornicated. There's more. I was the only person to go to the toilet in that time and when I tried to flush, it didn't work. I took the lid off the top bit and started yanking on the floating device, I remember doing that as a child flooding the bathroom, seemed like an option.. but nothing happened. I walked out feeling very bad knowing the young waitress was not going to get an early finish today. Tomorrow my face is probably on a poster pinned to every post in town ''wanted for shit and run''.
Still, not the lowest point of the day.. night guys.
That's rough, bro. Hope everything works itself out soon...
Both flowered under shortened flower periods. So by your logic, these strains if flowered under 12, would've doubled levels? C'mon guy. Different strokes for different folks.
Separate names with a comma.