punish the doctor more than the rapist

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
not what the law says you fucking clown. i already outlined every section of the law. it's written in pretty plain english.

but of course, look who i am talking to. the MASTER of redefining words so that he never has to deal with the crushing pain of being wrong, which he most usually is.
ha ha ha ha ha

ohh youre so hilarious.

only under the most extenuating of circumstances can sexual assault be "a misdemeanor" under that statute, even getting it down to class 4 requires a lot of extenuation (like a "victim" who refuses to press charges or help the prosecution cuz she "loves him")

any violence, coercion, exploitation, weapon use, bodily harm, forcible restraint, battery, or even harsh language bumps it up to class 3 or higher with a quickness.

you are demonstrating you absolute ignorance once again.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
They are only libertarians when it comes to white man's rights. Fuck all those rape victims and their war on men.

No wonder the libertarian movement is overwhelmingly white, male and single.
they need to fight back the war on men with the "men's rights movement". lo fucking l.



yeah, we all knew they have issues.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
ha ha ha ha ha

ohh youre so hilarious.

only under the most extenuating of circumstances can sexual assault be "a misdemeanor" under that statute, even getting it down to class 4 requires a lot of extenuation (like a "victim" who refuses to press charges or help the prosecution cuz she "loves him")

any violence, coercion, exploitation, weapon use, bodily harm, forcible restraint, battery, or even harsh language bumps it up to class 3 or higher with a quickness.

you are demonstrating you absolute ignorance once again.
raping a chick who you find blacked out drunk: class 4 felony

raping a drooling retard in a wheelchair because she grunted just so: class 4 felony (keep that in mind, bignbushy)

going ahead with a rape without her consent if she doesn't fight back: class 4 felony

16 year old raping a 12 year old: class 4 felony

gynecologist says he just needs to put a few fingers in there to check for non-existent creatures: class 4 felony

officer doing the dirty with perpunder his supervision: class 4 felony

tricking the girl into thinking you're her hubby: class 4 felony

even the stuff that bumps it up to class 3, like telling her you'll kill her, or kidnap her family, or holding her down after she has made it clear she does not consent, is WAY WAY WAY worse than providing an abortion to a rape victim that got pregnant.

wouldn't you agree?

so why do you defend this stuff? why are you even trying to argue?

why should a rapist who tells his victim that he's gonna fucking kill her family and then tapes her hands together and goes to rapeville on her get the same punishment as the doctor who aborts her rape baby next week?

you are a fucking joke, and you clearly can't read a straightforward law.
 

burgertime2010

Well-Known Member
as you have already asserted (at length), you suffer from epilepsy, whioch was a particular target of Mrs Sanger's wrath.

she WAS a racist, she WAS a eugenicist, she DID help push through sterilization programs for "defectives" (specifically including epileptics, like yourself) and DID dream up a scheme to exterminate the coloured races in america by "birth controlling" them out of existence.

planned parenthood and the entire abortion argument are th3e fruit of the poison tree, nothing about it is wholesome, nothing about it is anything short of evil.

if you hitch your wagon to a stone, dont be surprised if you go nowhere fast.
I do not care what she WAS, I am not convinced that you know what evil is, what standards are poison, and how the morality of all topics is in complete absolution. You are presumptuous to call your religious views facts and to write me of as a defective. My epilepsy is a result of injury, not genes. I am not the one dug in..."hitched" if you made a good point I would be happy. You don't know how to debate fairly.
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
raping a chick who you find blacked out drunk: class 4 felony

raping a drooling retard in a wheelchair because she grunted just so: class 4 felony (keep that in mind, bignbushy)

going ahead with a rape without her consent if she doesn't fight back: class 4 felony

16 year old raping a 12 year old: class 4 felony

gynecologist says he just needs to put a few fingers in there to check for non-existent creatures: class 4 felony

officer doing the dirty with perpunder his supervision: class 4 felony

tricking the girl into thinking you're her hubby: class 4 felony

even the stuff that bumps it up to class 3, like telling her you'll kill her, or kidnap her family, or holding her down after she has made it clear she does not consent, is WAY WAY WAY worse than providing an abortion to a rape victim that got pregnant.

wouldn't you agree?

so why do you defend this stuff? why are you even trying to argue?

why should a rapist who tells his victim that he's gonna fucking kill her family and then tapes her hands together and goes to rapeville on her get the same punishment as the doctor who aborts her rape baby next week?

you are a fucking joke, and you clearly can't read a straightforward law.
no, it is you who has failed miserably at reading a law.

read it again doofus, maybe make a checklist for your preferred rape forms.

there are very few escape hatches which can keep your felony under class 3.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
no, it is you who has failed miserably at reading a law.

read it again doofus, maybe make a checklist for your preferred rape forms.

there are very few escape hatches which can keep your felony under class 3.
goddamn you are obtuse.

maybe one day when you learn to read you'll not only understand the law, but also get a raise at whatever big box store you're stocking shelves for at min wage pay.
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
I do not care what she WAS, I am not convinced that you know what evil is, what standards are poison, and how the morality of all topics is in complete absolution. You are presumptuous to call your religious views facts and to write me of as a defective. My epilepsy is a result of injury, not genes. I am not the one dug in..."hitched" if you made a good point I would be happy. You don't know how to debate fairly.
my views are not religious in nature.

mrs sanger made no distinction between epilepsy from injury and genetic "defectiveness"

planned parenthood continues to this day with their "negro plan" of setting up shop in minority and poor communities, and trying hard to get fuzzy headed liberals like you to join the bandwagon of baby killing.

how am i not "debating fairly"?

you are holding a position created and disseminated by a madwoman, a eugenicist and a racist.

nobody is arguing that using rubbers, and the pill is bad, but Planned Parenthood is primarily interested in providing low and no-cost abortions , mainly to minorities.

all they need to put their scheme over the top, and into the genocide category is a big sign over the door of their "clinics" reading: "Arbeit Macht Frei"

your inability to see this is not a result of my "unfair" tactics, it is a result of incomplete examination of your position and it's real agenda.
 

burgertime2010

Well-Known Member
my views are not religious in nature.

mrs sanger made no distinction between epilepsy from injury and genetic "defectiveness"

planned parenthood continues to this day with their "negro plan" of setting up shop in minority and poor communities, and trying hard to get fuzzy headed liberals like you to join the bandwagon of baby killing.

how am i not "debating fairly"?

you are holding a position created and disseminated by a madwoman, a eugenicist and a racist.

nobody is arguing that using rubbers, and the pill is bad, but Planned Parenthood is primarily interested in providing low and no-cost abortions , mainly to minorities.

all they need to put their scheme over the top, and into the genocide category is a big sign over the door of their "clinics" reading: "Arbeit Macht Frei"

your inability to see this is not a result of my "unfair" tactics, it is a result of incomplete examination of your position and it's real agenda.
You tie an idea to an awful person, you tie me to a similar idea...that does not mean I am awful. I am not a supporter of the death penalty are you? Every race gets abortions "mainly minorities" is financial. your genocide does not seem to be working
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
you are holding a position created and disseminated by a madwoman, a eugenicist and a racist.
that's HILARIOUS, considering that you cite PHILLIPE RUSHTON in debates.

but of course, he is totally not racist, a eugenicist, or a madman.

fucking retard.

Planned Parenthood is primarily interested in providing low and no-cost abortions , mainly to minorities.
abortion is the least of what PP does, actually, and they help anybody who needs one to get one. it's not just limited to minorities, so your wet dream is basically over.

retarded stooge.
 

sheskunk

Well-Known Member
raping a chick who you find blacked out drunk: class 4 felony

raping a drooling retard in a wheelchair because she grunted just so: class 4 felony (keep that in mind, bignbushy)

going ahead with a rape without her consent if she doesn't fight back: class 4 felony

16 year old raping a 12 year old: class 4 felony

gynecologist says he just needs to put a few fingers in there to check for non-existent creatures: class 4 felony

officer doing the dirty with perpunder his supervision: class 4 felony

tricking the girl into thinking you're her hubby: class 4 felony

even the stuff that bumps it up to class 3, like telling her you'll kill her, or kidnap her family, or holding her down after she has made it clear she does not consent, is WAY WAY WAY worse than providing an abortion to a rape victim that got pregnant.

wouldn't you agree?

so why do you defend this stuff? why are you even trying to argue?

why should a rapist who tells his victim that he's gonna fucking kill her family and then tapes her hands together and goes to rapeville on her get the same punishment as the doctor who aborts her rape baby next week?

you are a fucking joke, and you clearly can't read a straightforward law.
Rape < Murder

DERP
 

mainliner

Well-Known Member
that's HILARIOUS, considering that you cite PHILLIPE RUSHTON in debates.

but of course, he is totally not racist, a eugenicist, or a madman.

fucking retard.



abortion is the least of what PP does, actually, and they help anybody who needs one to get one. it's not just limited to minorities, so your wet dream is basically over.

retarded stooge.
would you like a cup of tea?
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
You tie an idea to an awful person, you tie me to a similar idea...that does not mean I am awful. I am not a supporter of the death penalty are you? Every race gets abortions "mainly minorities" is financial. your genocide does not seem to be working
sanger CREATED your position.

just like nazis cant shake off the spectre of hitler and the holocaust, marxists cant dislodge stalin mao and pol pot from their past, and the left insists on dredging up T Jefferson's slave holding at every opportunity, these are historical facts which continue to have some validity , even today.

the left's schizophrenic ability to forget their own past with a quickness but somehow managing to hang on to every little nugget which might defame those on the right, is laughable.

Sanger was still pimping her madness in the 60's, getting interviewed by Mike Wallace, and her crazy was just as pronounced back then, when abortion was still illegal, but she was doin it anyway.

you have shackled yourself to the planned parenthood agenda where "Birth Control = Abortion", while simultaneously insisting that all who oppose abortion for ANY reason most be religiously motivated (as you accused me of being) with the implication that im some bible thumping idiot who thinks the world was created 5000 years ago by jesus.

look at the uproar over obamacare's "birth control" stipulations. all that bullshit was about 3 specific procedures (not pills, not rubbers, not iud's or spermicidal lubes, nor sponges, jellies or anything else) 3 specific procedures that one group didnt want to include in their medical plan, and it turned into world war 3 as far as the left was concerned.

the same left that expects me to roll over like a puppy for a milk bone every time they come up with some new scheme to infringe on MY rights, which they dont value.

thats where you sit, firmly entrenched on the left, who always demand concessions on every principle or right, but refuse to budge an inch on their sacred cows.

so much for your much vaunted "fairness"
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
sanger CREATED your position.

just like nazis cant shake off the spectre of hitler and the holocaust, marxists cant dislodge stalin mao and pol pot from their past, and the left insists on dredging up T Jefferson's slave holding at every opportunity, these are historical facts which continue to have some validity , even today.

the left's schizophrenic ability to forget their own past with a quickness but somehow managing to hang on to every little nugget which might defame those on the right, is laughable.

Sanger was still pimping her madness in the 60's, getting interviewed by Mike Wallace, and her crazy was just as pronounced back then, when abortion was still illegal, but she was doin it anyway.

you have shackled yourself to the planned parenthood agenda where "Birth Control = Abortion", while simultaneously insisting that all who oppose abortion for ANY reason most be religiously motivated (as you accused me of being) with the implication that im some bible thumping idiot who thinks the world was created 5000 years ago by jesus.

look at the uproar over obamacare's "birth control" stipulations. all that bullshit was about 3 specific procedures (not pills, not rubbers, not iud's or spermicidal lubes, nor sponges, jellies or anything else) 3 specific procedures that one group didnt want to include in their medical plan, and it turned into world war 3 as far as the left was concerned.

the same left that expects me to roll over like a puppy for a milk bone every time they come up with some new scheme to infringe on MY rights, which they dont value.

thats where you sit, firmly entrenched on the left, who always demand concessions on every principle or right, but refuse to budge an inch on their sacred cows.

so much for your much vaunted "fairness"
just gonna save everyone the time again.

 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
i love the way bucklefuckle makes the charge, completely without evidence or citation, implies that somehow when a bitch gets raped, her gyno is the one charged with a crime, and then claims that this mysterious shit is going on in "his state"

moved to colorado 3 weeks ago, already an expert on the local political system, already claiming ownership.

completely baseless claims from the asshole who never met a basleless claim he didnt like, inspires confidence and trust among the masses.

how long before bucklefuckle carpetbags his way into running for congress?

ohh wait, i forgot, congressmen have to actually work for 20 weeks of the year, so thats right out.
anyone else behind this plan?

the plan is that when a woman gets pregnant from rape, we punish the doctor more than the rapist.

the guy running for senate in my state is all for it, how about you guys?

#GOPisgrand

#dontsayrape
oh goody, our quarterly rape thread.

:lol:
 

SmokeyDan

Well-Known Member
Buck, can you redo the cock flower with white, black, asian, and hispanic cocks for more diversity.

I'll make it my avatar.
 
Top