Poo protest in Africa

see4

Well-Known Member
If a person wants to open a business on property they own, how does having to be granted permission from a non owner to do so, not involve force?
Firstly, in most townships, cities and counties, your property will need to be zoned for business. Second, that business should not be forced to do anything the owner(s) don't want to do, UNLESS the things they are doing are criminal or violate civil rights.

Just like you are free to yell at someone in their face, UNLESS you verbally threaten them, then you are committing a crime.

Not sure why this is a hard concept for you to grasp. Seriously.

What happens to the so called owner of the property if they act like THEY own the property and open a business anyway?
This doesn't even make sense. You are way too generic in your responses and ideas.

Just because the bearer of the gun, your beloved nanny state, has the gun stuck up your ass, instead of the small of your back doesn't mean that force isn't involved.

The fact a person can't open a business on their terms is where the force comes in. You worship at the feet of regulation.

You are a prohibitionist.
Accusations, name calling and unfounded partisan hackery. You have lost.

 
Last edited:

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
If a person wants to open a business on property they own, how does having to be granted permission from a non owner to do so, not involve force?

What happens to the so called owner of the property if they act like THEY own the property and open a business anyway?

Just because the bearer of the gun, your beloved nanny state, has the gun stuck up your ass, instead of the small of your back doesn't mean that force isn't involved.

The fact a person can't open a business on their terms is where the force comes in. You worship at the feet of regulation.

You are a prohibitionist.
let's try this for a second time, see if you can answer a yes or no question.

is it possible to force someone to open a public business rather than a private one?
 

see4

Well-Known Member
i am cooking meatloaf, an artichoke, mashed potatoes, and crescent rolls.
Do you steam a whole artichoke? I think that is the best way, and then make a mustard dipping sauce for the leaves and heart. I can seriously eat like 5 of those things in once sitting.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Do you steam a whole artichoke? I think that is the best way, and then make a mustard dipping sauce for the leaves and heart. I can seriously eat like 5 of those things in once sitting.
remove the top inch or so, as well as the bottom inch of the stem, place it in about two inches of water upside down, and boil the water with the lid on for about 45 minutes. that's what i do at least.
 

see4

Well-Known Member
remove the top inch or so, as well as the bottom inch of the stem, place it in about two inches of water upside down, and boil the water with the lid on for about 45 minutes. that's what i do at least.
Yea, I've done that method before, but then you have to let them sit to drain.

Now, I put them in a steam pot, not touching the water, and I simply cut the stem to the base and steam for 35-40 minutes and serve em.
 
Top