One more Obama outrage for the day

Glaucoma

Well-Known Member
so just because they have guns, they are evil now?

are these people not allowed to defend themselves?

are you saying that gun control would work?
LOL, tell us all more about your idea of cartels that only kill in self defense. This is interesting for sure. I wanna see if you can get any dumber.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
LOL, tell us all more about your idea of cartels that only kill in self defense. This is interesting for sure. I wanna see if you can get any dumber.
so the cartels shouldn't have guns because they don't always kill in self defense, but it is imperative that every american have unrestricted access to guns because obviously no american has ever killed for a reason other than self defense?

are you saying gun control works or something by the way?
 

Glaucoma

Well-Known Member
so the cartels shouldn't have guns because they don't always kill in self defense, but it is imperative that every american have unrestricted access to guns because obviously no american has ever killed for a reason other than self defense?

are you saying gun control works or something by the way?
Where the fuck did you get that out of my reply? That shit is AMAZING!
Citation required, bitch boy.

Are you going to tell us more about these benevolent cartels or not, idiot?
i'm pretty sure the cartels are looking to prevent violence and get their product to market as safely as possible.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Where the fuck did you get that out of my reply? That shit is AMAZING!
Citation required, bitch boy.

Are you going to tell us more about these benevolent cartels or not, idiot?
you seem to be implying that because the cartels don't use gun in self defrnse 100% of the time, they shouldn't have guns.

by that standard, neither should americans!

and how are you going to keep cartels from getting guns besides via gun control measures? doesn't gun control not work and just make things more violent?

do more guns not keep us all safer?
 

Glaucoma

Well-Known Member
you seem to be implying that because the cartels don't use gun in self defrnse 100% of the time, they shouldn't have guns.

by that standard, neither should americans!

and how are you going to keep cartels from getting guns besides via gun control measures? doesn't gun control not work and just make things more violent?

do more guns not keep us all safer?
You seem to be a retarded fuck-wit.

I brought extra gatorade this time. Get to it!


Sig quality quote if I've ever seen one. Surely somebody will pick it up?
i'm pretty sure the cartels are looking to prevent violence and get their product to market as safely as possible.
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
No i didnt know that
ive stated im not a hundred percent educated
it's not true.

the NBP voter intimidation case was held over because Booosh and his AG were on their way out, so the prosecution was left to Bwana Obama, and it was Eric Cockbreath Holder who dropped the charges.

bucklefuckle is, as usual, turning the truth into a lie by twisting the details into a knot.

malik shabaazz was still under charges for voter intimidation when he visited the white house in barry's first 20 days.
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
Since this was in reply to Dr Kynes, I think he gets first dibs. If you pass on it, Kynes, I'll take it.
i already made the case clearly, bucklefuckle is dancing around trying to imply that mexican criminal syndicates are exactly the same as my aged mother who keeps a .357 loaded and close at hand.

if you have some angle you think might pull the wool from bucklefuckle's eyes and the block of wood from his head, feel free to attempt it.

i gave up on him long ago.
these days i just refute his retarded claims for those who arent aware how deceptive and insidious he is.
 

earnest_voice

Well-Known Member
you're a criminal though, so am i.

i'm pretty sure the cartels are looking to prevent violence and get their product to market as safely as possible.
Prevent violence through ultra violence? You should do a run for the cartels. If you're unfortunate enough to loose the dope then it'll be on you but more likely your family.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
it's not true.

the NBP voter intimidation case was held over because Booosh and his AG were on their way out, so the prosecution was left to Bwana Obama, and it was Eric Cockbreath Holder who dropped the charges.

bucklefuckle is, as usual, turning the truth into a lie by twisting the details into a knot.

malik shabaazz was still under charges for voter intimidation when he visited the white house in barry's first 20 days.
The department investigated complaints that two leaders of the New Black Panther Party, King Samir Shabazz and Jerry Jackson, intimidated white voters at a Philadelphia polling place in 2008. A criminal investigation into the incident was dropped by the Bush administration

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/26/us/26panther.html?_r=2&


retard.
 

earnest_voice

Well-Known Member
The department investigated complaints that two leaders of the New Black Panther Party, King Samir Shabazz and Jerry Jackson, intimidated white voters at a Philadelphia polling place in 2008. A criminal investigation into the incident was dropped by the Bush administration

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/26/us/26panther.html?_r=2&


retard.
Is this the one?



Yeah he ends up holding the door open for some elderly ladies. Fucking terrorist
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Is this the one?



Yeah he ends up holding the door open for some elderly ladies. Fucking terrorist
he's black, and kynes is a fan of "european cultural superiority" though.

blacks are not part of "REAL AMERICA", they are part of the "multicultural wasteland of bullshit".

now before you go thinking that kynes means "multicultural" in the correct sense, let's let him clarify what he means by "multicultural"...

if you want a real "Multicultural Experience" move into an apartment block in ... central oakland.
so multicultural, according to kynes, means "black". not multicultural, but black.

to prosecute a voter intimidation case, you need at least one intimidated voter. there were none. none came forward and none were found. bush's DOJ dropped it (just like they dropped the case against the minutemen intimidating latinos in arizona in 2006, not a peep about that though). obama's DOJ pursued it on more narrow grounds before dropping it as well.

but kynes feels he can still make some racism hay out of it, so it is still a favorite playtoy of his.
 
Last edited:

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member


"In Arizona, Roy Warden, an anti-immigration activist with the Minutemen, and a handful of supporters staked out a Tucson precinct and questioned Hispanic voters at the polls to determine whether they spoke English." The article continued: "Armed with a 9mm Glock automatic strapped to his side, Warden said he planned to photograph Hispanic voters entering polls in an effort to identify illegal immigrants and felons."
 
but guns prevent violence. guns lessen violence.

all of a sudden more guns are bad? you want gun control?
Arm law abiding citizens so they can defend themselves (if they choose). And avoid classified operations that purposely give guns to criminal organizations. We should go even further and just end the war on drugs! Immigration wouldn't even be an issue if these people could provide for themselves in their own country. They wouldn't want to move!!! Mexico's a beautiful place with a lot of ugly people running it
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Arm law abiding citizens so they can defend themselves (if they choose). And avoid classified operations that purposely give guns to criminal organizations. We should go even further and just end the war on drugs! Immigration wouldn't even be an issue if these people could provide for themselves in their own country. They wouldn't want to move!!! Mexico's a beautiful place with a lot of ugly people running it
either guns reduce violence or they don't.

if we took guns away from anyone who ever committed a crime, we'd have to abolish the second amendment.
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
The department investigated complaints that two leaders of the New Black Panther Party, King Samir Shabazz and Jerry Jackson, intimidated white voters at a Philadelphia polling place in 2008. A criminal investigation into the incident was dropped by the Bush administration

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/26/us/26panther.html?_r=2&


retard.
the criminal prosecution was not pursued by the boooosh admin, because they were going out the fucking door.

Bwana Obama's bootlickers are the one who dismissed the voting rights act and civil rights charges you lying sack of horse shit.

lulz at the NYTimes as your source authority.

the O-Man's appointees dropped the case just as the justice dept was about to win by default since the NBP didnt bother to appear to defend their actions.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/may/29/career-lawyers-overruled-on-voting-case/
 
Top