beardo
Well-Known Member
Why should they collect anything? Why should you be taxed? Are you not free?
Obama supporters
- Thread starter SirGreenThumb
- Start date
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
classic freeloader argument there. you love to enjoy the benefits, but call footing the costs 'slavery'.
beardo
Well-Known Member
I think all "benefits" should be eliminated
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
one of the benefits of society is the invention of the internet and the infrastructure it depends on. so i know a good first step towards boycotting the benefits if you're serious about that.
Smokin'mom
Active Member
I don't think you get my point. We're never going to get anywhere hiding on stoner forums complaining about the way things are, instead of actually trying to change it. Do you think we would have gotten anywhere in the 70's if the youth had just sat around b!tching about not being able to vote for the @sshole drafting him? Using my high-logic, miss-wording to discredit my meaning would be like me using your misspelling of picky to discredit yours
beardo
Well-Known Member
they charge for the internet, & it is privatised, if it is subsidised or was created with public funds or is made available for free it is only for the pourpose of tracking & monitoring & oppression.
canndo
Well-Known Member
A lot can be done from one side of a terminal. In the 70's folks didn't have the communicative power they have now.
as far as meaning and logic, I have only your posts to go by, if they don't mean what they say then I can't very well know that. Spelling? pick all you wish and the conversations will devolve to - dictionaries and spell checkers.
canndo
Well-Known Member
Never changes does it? I suppose many of us need our surrogates. I will always entertain your discussions beenthere, why don't you try a legit argument with me instead of cheering others' biting comments?
beardo
Well-Known Member
[youtube]BZwuTo7zKM8[/youtube]you have all just whittnessed me destroy uncle buck yet again in debate
I also destroyed Canndo in this debate-
SirGreenThumb
Well-Known Member
..........
Smokin'mom
Active Member
Well just to let you know, I thought I had made my meaning clear with my first response to you. I happen to understand a little about the way we work as a country and I'm married to someone who loves to talk politics so we're always on the same page, I guess I forgot that some people may not understand the way it works and somehow be led astray by my statements. Had to sharpen the old debater a little anyway. Did anybody manage to understand my first response? Oh and by the way I can't spell worth a damn, I'd be lost without a dictionary
;-p
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
If I read it correctly, your basic premise is that a situation needs to be expressed (in writing) before it can be legislated. cnWell just to let you know, I thought I had made my meaning clear with my first response to you. I happen to understand a little about the way we work as a country and I'm married to someone who loves to talk politics so we're always on the same page, I guess I forgot that some people may not understand the way it works and somehow be led astray by my statements. Had to sharpen the old debater a little anyway. Did anybody manage to understand my first response? Oh and by the way I can't spell worth a damn, I'd be lost without a dictionary