Obama sucks Goldman's Sack ...

ViRedd

ViRedd

New Member
hanimmal said:
Pssst, mindmelted.

It is because nobody gives a shit enough to factcheck a article by her.
Click to expand...
Psst ... hanimmal ...

Its because the progressives have nothing on their side except emotion. They cannot counter Coulter with facts because they have none. Psst .... :lol:
 
hanimmal

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
lol that's true Vi, many of her things are so made up that finding facts about fictitious events would be impossible.
 
N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
hanimmal said:
Y
That Clinton somehow being in bed with banks bailed out mexico, (who is a third world country, and not a large trading partner of ours, who actually share a border with us, meaning any instability of a collapsed government would put even more pressure on us in the form of illegal immigrants right?).
Click to expand...

Mexico is the USA's third largest trade partner after China and Canada. You really do not ever check your "Facts" do you?

http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/statistics/highlights/top/top0911yr.html

C'Mon Han your better than that. I hope its not an attempt to deceive and that its really just you not knowing what it is your talking about.

Keep lambasting people for not checking facts.
 
hanimmal

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
Mexico is the USA's third largest trade partner after China and Canada. You really do not ever check your "Facts" do you?

http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/...top0911yr.html

C'Mon Han your better than that. I hope its not an attempt to deceive and that its really just you not knowing what it is your talking about.

Keep lambasting people for not checking facts.
Click to expand...
Too true, today. Any luck finding one from early 90's?

Back in 92 the trade was about 3 billion dollars a year or so right? Today (post nafta) they are up to around what $12b, as this happened right after nafta came about right? And the mexican government who was just put in power over the olden days who wanted to bring a more modern mexico up and become a more responsible partner in the world.


So how does this equate to Clinton being in with banks or whatever craziness Coulture said by bailing out a small country that borders with us in a time that they were starting to reach out and become part of the world economy?

I guess because you get numbers from 2009 it doesn't.
 
Wavels

Wavels

Well-Known Member
hanimmal said:
A little pro Reaganism..... which had above 18% unemployment, his massive bailouts of politician and not just the Dems.

So yeah very very slanted typical Coultur.
Click to expand...
Well, under Reagan unemployment peaked at 10.8%

What the article highlights is the duplicitous nature of the Obama cronyism at work.
Hope and change is well underway!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top