NOT GUILTY ...zimmermen

Harrekin · Jul 17, 2013

UncleBuck said:
it was so funny how his brother went on piers morgan and complained that poor ol' george is gonna have to worry about some vigilante now for the rest of his life.

irony is lost on the irreparably stupid.

Watching some thug creeping in your neighbourhood is not vigilantism.

Attacking someone who's watching you creep about IS assault tho.

Damn I'd kill for some skittles...

MyPetSkunk · Jul 17, 2013

ChesusRice said:
Trayvon vs Zimmerman - Stormfront

www.stormfront.org Stormfront General Poetry‎

Cached

6 days ago - 10 posts - 9 authors
... the prosecution made. its case and this. Zimmerman character is getting shafted. ....Zimmerman is an American hero. Jim Colyer is offline ...

OMG, OMG, Chesus Christ, you went to stormfront! You racist, skinhead, jew-hating, holocaust denying, white nationalist loving, unremitting failure!

Attack buck...attack! Red team go, red team go!

UncleBuck · Jul 17, 2013

Harrekin said:
Watching some thug creeping in your neighbourhood is not vigilantism.

Attacking someone who's watching you creep about IS assault tho.

Damn I'd kill for some skittles...

martin was no thug, and he was not creeping. he was walking home and then ran.

defending yourself from some stranger who follows you in the dark with his gun is not assault, it is self defense.

MyPetSkunk said:
OMG, OMG, Chesus Christ, you went to stormfront! You racist, skinhead, jew-hating, holocaust denying, white nationalist loving, unremitting failure!

Attack buck...attack! Red team go, red team go!

there's a huge difference between promoting stormfront as a source and using it to shame. subtlety is lost on some though.

MyPetSkunk · Jul 17, 2013

UncleBuck said:
there's a huge difference between promoting stormfront as a source and using it to shame. subtlety is lost on some though.

As well as humor seems to be lost on some too.

For all we know, Chesus left Riu for stormfront. :eyesmoke:

Harrekin · Jul 17, 2013

UncleBuck said:
martin was no thug, and he was not creeping. he was walking home and then ran.

defending yourself from some stranger who follows you in the dark with his gun is not assault, it is self defense.

there's a huge difference between promoting stormfront as a source and using it to shame. subtlety is lost on some though.

Your trolling is getting weak.

Martin attacked Zimmerman first, had he left the "creepy azz crakah" alone he wouldn't have gotten a nine in the chest.

I wonder if any skittles fell out via the gunshot wound?

Hemlock · Jul 17, 2013

UncleBuck said:
martin was no thug, and he was not creeping. he was walking home and then ran.

defending yourself from some stranger who follows you in the dark with his gun is not assault, it is self defense.

Travyon should of kept running he would still be alive. But he wanted to be what do they call it a gansta..Well the gansta got shot.

Rob Roy · Jul 17, 2013

mr sunshine said:
My bad confused Peruvian. .....either way i think someone will get him...if a seventeen year-old can kick your ass without u even getting a punch in u deserve to get got!!

The little brother of a friend fought in the now defunct Tough Man contests. He used fake i.d. to say he was over 18. He was 16 at the time. Most of the people he faced he knocked out. Power = mass x speed. It doesn't care how old you are...just that you combine the two. I will stop now before I bore you with back when I was your age stories...

Antidisestablishmentarian · Jul 17, 2013

UncleBuck said:
because he did.

"shit, he ran"

"are you following him"

"yeah"

and later on...

"and then i went towards him"

how would you feel if a creepy stranger followed you home in the dark without identifying himself, first in car, then on foot, even going after you after you ran? would you be fearing for your life?

and of course the dead kid who was doing nothing wrong that he followed in the dark with his gun.

i did not say that. You have my name with someone else's quote. It's the last one.

Antidisestablishmentarian · Jul 17, 2013

UncleBuck said:
for the same reason that zimmerman didn't want to even say his address. you gonna show a possible sexual pervert where you live?

the better question is, why didn't zimm stay in his car?

but of course, it wasn't zimm that needed to know his place, it was martin, right?

why did zimm hang around and shoot the hell out of martin? we know that zimm kept looking for martin and "then went towards him", zimm's own words.

Martin did need to learn you can't beat someone that is carrying a gun, and tell them they are going to die. His place? Lol race is not a factor for me Buck. Try that on someone else.

Zimm hung around because its his neighborhood, he was the watch captain, and he shot Trayvon once, for beating the shit out of him and telling him he is going to die.

I will not address the out of context quote you posted earlier.

SHOTGUN420 · Jul 17, 2013

American Pig - Thery're Doing It For Trayvon:

https://app.box.com/s/9dqv6kmaec2egdt14o19

;-)

ASMALLVOICE · Jul 17, 2013

All I can say, unless it is downright freezing outside and windy as hell, and you show up at my place with a hoodie or anything that blocks me from seeing your face and eyes. Do not ask me to open the gate or for damn sure don't knock on the front door, if you do, pull the hood off or be denied, or much, much worse...............dead.

Peace

Asmallvoice

UncleBuck · Jul 17, 2013

Hemlock said:
Travyon should of kept running he would still be alive. But he wanted to be what do they call it a gansta..Well the gansta got shot.

zimmerman should have gone back to his car and stopped following an innocent child. but he wanted to be the vigilante, well the vigilante got his ass beat and is now a pariah for life.

UncleBuck · Jul 17, 2013

Antidisestablishmentarian said:
Martin did need to learn you can't beat someone that is carrying a gun, and tell them they are going to die. His place? Lol race is not a factor for me Buck. Try that on someone else.

why did martin need to know his place but not zimm?

zimm should have stayed in his car, why not comment on that? why only comment that martin needed to know his place?

zimm never said he had a gun and martin never said "you're gonna die".

martin had every right to defend himself from a creepy stranger that followed him in the dark when he was doing nothing wrong and had every right to be there.

Antidisestablishmentarian said:
Zimm hung around because its his neighborhood, he was the watch captain, and he shot Trayvon once, for beating the shit out of him and telling him he is going to die.

martin hung around because it's his neighborhood, he was staying there, and tried to defend himself from a creepy guy that was following him in the dark in his own neighborhood without identifying himself.

i will not address the baseless lie you keep trying to spread another time.

UncleBuck · Jul 17, 2013

ASMALLVOICE said:
All I can say, unless it is downright freezing outside and windy as hell, and you show up at my place with a hoodie or anything that blocks me from seeing your face and eyes. Do not ask me to open the gate or for damn sure don't knock on the front door, if you do, pull the hood off or be denied, or much, much worse...............dead.

Peace

Asmallvoice

family feud asked 100 people what the first thing they cover in the rain is: number one answer, their heads.

abandonconflict · Jul 17, 2013

KillCaustic · Jul 17, 2013

UncleBuck said:
zimmerman should have gone back to his car and stopped following an innocent child. but he wanted to be the vigilante, well the vigilante got his ass beat and is now a pariah for life.

That's a bit of a stretch don't you think, an innocent child? I wouldn't describe any 17 year old as an "innocent child". A 4 year old is an innocent child, a 17 year old, not so much.

cannabineer · Jul 17, 2013

KillCaustic said:
That's a bit of a stretch don't you think, an innocent child? I wouldn't describe any 17 year old as an "innocent child". A 4 year old is an innocent child, a 17 year old, not so much.

I must tell you ... at 17 I was startlingly innocent. I HATED it. cn

UncleBuck · Jul 17, 2013

KillCaustic said:
That's a bit of a stretch don't you think, an innocent child? I wouldn't describe any 17 year old as an "innocent child". A 4 year old is an innocent child, a 17 year old, not so much.

his actions that night that zimm saw as suspect or criminal or worth following were innocent at least, my scope on that statement is confined to what zimm could have known.

UncleBuck · Jul 17, 2013

cannabineer said:
I must tell you ... at 17 I was startlingly innocent. I HATED it. cn

caution: innocence may cause localized chafing.

cannabineer · Jul 17, 2013

UncleBuck said:
caution: innocence may cause localized chafing.

Oh so true, especially when ursine dimensions meet monastic duty cycles. cn

NOT GUILTY ...zimmermen

Well-Known Member

Active Member

Well-Known Member

Active Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Active Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Ursus marijanus

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Ursus marijanus