Yeah, I guess I can chalk my opinions on the corporate lobby to the differences in our countries. We have the Federal Accountability Act which sets caps for political contributions and requires that both the contributions and the lobbyists be registered. The PM's office recently gave an MP the boot because her husband used her parliamentary office to meet with a lobbyist.
Anyway, studies like this one might be the most 'strategic' route toward the end of this silly prohibition. Studies like this wouldn't likely be conducted in the US because they don't seek to reinforce the carefully cultivated image of harm. Proponents of legalization will have a ready cache of close-to-home studies to draw empirical data from in support of legalization or decriminalization. I had a discussion recently about Prop 19 and whether we'd see weed legal in Canada or in the US first. My question, even if Prop 19 passes, what's to prevent the DEA from busting down doors anyway ?
We've seen that with the MM dispensaries.
Unless there are provisions to safeguard people from federal prosecution, it sounds like Prop 19 is just pissing in the wind.
At least with studies like this, we can see that the benefits are far more widespread than just its well-documented musculoskeletal and vasodilatory effects. Anytime that another group of patients can add to the argument, legalization is one step closer.