New Evidence in Michael Brown Case

N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
the white officer killed the unarmed black teenl
Click to expand...
When I read "black teen" i think of a 15 or 16 year old, not a bona fide legal adult.
Michael brown was a man, not some little teenager.
The Media is full of this crap, little spins put out to subvert your subconscious mind into believing their narrative.
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Hazydat620 said:
You mean like the first hand account from someone who wasn't even there, like the officers friend? Dumbass, it's played from both sides, especially the police's.
Click to expand...
They have 8 eyewitnesses giving testimony to the grand jury. So far the Michael Brown narrative that he did nothing wrong is falling apart
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
They have 8 eyewitnesses giving testimony to the grand jury. So far the Michael Brown narrative that he did nothing wrong is falling apart
Click to expand...
all that matters is what happened at the very end, none of the stuff that happens before is relevant no matter how often the racists like NLXSK and jahbruddahthere want to bring it up.
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
all that matters is what happened at the very end, none of the stuff that happens before is relevant no matter how often the racists like NLXSK and jahbruddahthere want to bring it up.
Click to expand...
What happened before is a man tried to take a cops gun after hitting him.
Put yourself in his position.
Would you have a fear for your safety?
 
Harrekin

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
all that matters is what happened at the very end, none of the stuff that happens before is relevant no matter how often the racists like NLXSK and jahbruddahthere want to bring it up.
Click to expand...
You mean the part where he got shot trying to take the cops guns through the window of the car?

Or where he committed a strong arm robbery?

I bet if you were in Germany in 1938 you'd be defending the Nazis and despite all the clear evidence and people telling you otherwise, you'd still be defending them in 1945.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Harrekin said:
You mean the part where he got shot trying to take the cops guns through the window of the car?

Or where he committed a strong arm robbery?

I bet if you were in Germany in 1938 you'd be defending the Nazis and despite all the clear evidence and people telling you otherwise, you'd still be defending them in 1945.
Click to expand...
i love how you try to invert racism in a feeble and transparent attempt to make your own racism a virtue.
 
S

spandy

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
all that matters is what happened at the very end, none of the stuff that happens before is relevant no matter how often the racists like NLXSK and jahbruddahthere want to bring it up.
Click to expand...

WTF, he hits a cop then tries to take his firearm, and that doesn't matter?

So full of apology, cannot process reality. That's the mudscuttle way.
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
spandy said:
WTF, he hits a cop then tries to take his firearm, and that doesn't matter?

So full of apology, cannot process reality. That's the mudscuttle way.
Click to expand...
I would actually like your post.
But then you go all Klanny with the mudscuttle remark
You are such a racist dick
 
desert dude

desert dude

Well-Known Member
What an eloquent description of the professionally outraged cadre!

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/391195/stubborn-facts-ferguson-jack-dunphy

"Ferguson has become the latest nesting zone for America’s itinerant protesters. Unburdened by jobs or other responsibilities, these people are free to drift from city to city and cause to cause, occupying Wall Street and decrying capitalism in New York City one day, lamenting global warming in Chicago on another day, and now marching against police brutality in St. Louis today. These people’s raison d’être is to march and express their outrage; the target of that outrage is whatever is most convenient at the time."
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
desert dude said:
What an eloquent description of the professionally outraged cadre!

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/391195/stubborn-facts-ferguson-jack-dunphy

"Ferguson has become the latest nesting zone for America’s itinerant protesters. Unburdened by jobs or other responsibilities, these people are free to drift from city to city and cause to cause, occupying Wall Street and decrying capitalism in New York City one day, lamenting global warming in Chicago on another day, and now marching against police brutality in St. Louis today. These people’s raison d’être is to march and express their outrage; the target of that outrage is whatever is most convenient at the time."
Click to expand...
whereas your outrage remains steadily aimed at minorities and women.
 
MuyLocoNC

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
all that matters is what happened at the very end, none of the stuff that happens before is relevant
Click to expand...
That's odd and hypocritical. According to your endless narrative in the Trayvon Martin thread, all the stuff that happens before the very end is completely relevant.

It's quite amazing how you can make the exact opposite argument in two different cases and end up being completely wrong on both.

Here comes the liberal back pedaling and word salad that will completely validate your idiocy in your mind and make you look like a fucking clown to everyone else reading it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top