National Defense Authorization Act sections 1031 and 1032

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
They already have a way to get around the citizen requirement in this act. That one guy we murdered Duke had a hard on for and kept mentioning he was declared a non-citizen. People mentioned even non-citizens have the right of due process. Mein Fuher Long Legged Mack Daddy now has gotten around that pesky constitution.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/...8S02xx:e578148

(e) Authorities- Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect existing law or authorities, relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States or any other persons who are captured or arrested in the United States.

(b) Applicability to United States Citizens and Lawful Resident Aliens-

(1) UNITED STATES CITIZENS- The requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend to citizens of the United States.

(2) LAWFUL RESIDENT ALIENS- The requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend to a lawful resident alien of the United States on the basis of conduct taking place within the United States, except to the extent permitted by the Constitution of the United States.


Is this sinking in yet?
nope, more fun to act like the world is out to get you as part of some nefarious kabal.

this place needs a "conspiracy theories" sub forum. it would clear out half of what's in this politics section and i wouldn't have to be reminded that my wife and i are part of some globalist plot to control hollywood and the banks.

Let us look at the final text of the bill. In "Subtitle D--Detainee Matters", Sec. 1031, "Congress affirms that the authority of the President...includes the authority...to detain...any person...who was a part of or substantially supported...enemy forces." The keyword here is "substantially supported." This designation is extrajudicial - that is, at the President's discretion. Sec. 1032 says, "The requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend to citizens of the United States." The keyword here is "requirement." In other words, the President has the authority to indefinitely detain any person who "substantially supported" the enemy, and is in fact required to do so - unless it is a U.S. citizen, in which case it is at the President's discretion.
 
Top