More global warming!

desert dude

desert dude

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
desert dude said:
http://auburnpub.com/ap/state/brrr-february-brought-record-cold-snow-to-auburn-and-the/article_8d6da144-3e85-51a3-8290-c75bb9ae560c.html




A science denying Eyetalian:
Art DeGaetano, director of the Northeast Regional Climate Center at Cornell University, says Buffalo, Syracuse and Ithaca shivered through their coldest month on record. February's average temperature was 10.9 degrees in Buffalo, beating the 1934 record of 11.4. The monthly average was 9.0 in Syracuse and 10.2 in Ithaca.
Click to expand...
What is so difficult to understand?

"Future climate change and associated impacts will be different from region to region around the globe. The effects of an increase in global temperature include a rise in sea levels and a change in the amount and pattern of precipitation, as well as a probable expansion of subtropical deserts. Warming is expected to be strongest in the Arctic, with the continuing retreat of glaciers, permafrost and sea ice. Other likely effects of the warming include more frequent extreme weather events including heat waves, droughts, heavy rainfall, and heavy snowfall; ocean acidification; and species extinctions due to shifting temperature regimes. Effects significant to humans include the threat to food security from decreasing crop yields and the loss of habitat from inundation."

Would you expect record highs/lows to continuously be broken year after year if the current warming was not anthropogenic?

The funny thing is you post shit like this and think it somehow supports your case... All of us and the scientific community have told you this shit would start happening more frequently as more time passes and what-do-ya-know... we were right..

I think it must be all those scientific instruments and shit we use to measure with... tends to work out a lot better than gut instincts and hunches..
 
N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
In the future there will be storms, most of them will not break records. Some will, but its because of Global cooling caused by too many icebergs cooling the ocean.

Now if there are storms later this year that don't break records, I can claim victory!
 
MuyLocoNC

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
I especially enjoyed the two reports that came out recently by two groups of big 'ol MMGW proponents, offering explanations for the "hiatus" that according to some of our members, didn't and isn't happening. Weird how all the smart, climatologists on RIU could be at such odds with the very people they claim are beyond reproach. They even went so far as to say the "hiatus" will most likely continue until the end of the decade.

Weird, huh?
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
NoDrama said:
In the future there will be storms, most of them will not break records. Some will, but its because of Global cooling caused by too many icebergs cooling the ocean.

Now if there are storms later this year that don't break records, I can claim victory!
Click to expand...
tell me again about the complete corporate takeover of the food supply, the end of farmer's markets, and the illegality of home gardens.

that was almost 5 years ago since you predicted that, how's that coming along?
 
N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
"The year 2014 ranks as Earth’s warmest since 1880, according to two separate analyses by NASA and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) scientists."

http://www.nasa.gov/press/2015/january/nasa-determines-2014-warmest-year-in-modern-record/#.VPO4SfmjN8E

Retard, denier
Click to expand...
It says this in your link:

Since 1880, Earth’s average surface temperature has warmed by about 1.4 degrees Fahrenheit

Tell me, if its 1.4F, why do the other claims made say it has risen by 1.7C? One is more than double of the other?
Why? Why does the data not correlate to the other?

You can't have one set of scientists claim the Earths temps have risen 3.5F and the other saying 1.4F.
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
NoDrama said:
It says this in your link:

Since 1880, Earth’s average surface temperature has warmed by about 1.4 degrees Fahrenheit

Tell me, if its 1.4F, why do the other claims made say it has risen by 1.7C? One is more than double of the other?
Why? Why does the data not correlate to the other?

You can't have one set of scientists claim the Earths temps have risen 3.5F and the other saying 1.4F.
Click to expand...
Cite it
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Wavels said:
Of course weather is not climate and climate is not weather.
This having been established, I find it quite amusing that these articles even exist.
Hardee har har...

http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/snowfalls-are-now-just-a-thing-of-the-past-724017.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/08/opinion/sunday/the-end-of-snow.html?_r=1


The end of snow, seriously...really...??? lol

Reality sorta sucks, dontcha know?
Click to expand...
Wavels said:
Facts are immutable, interpretive opinions thereof, not so much.
Facts should be immune from any and all opinions.

Nowadays, " facts" have become subjective, based upon contextual interpretations, which may enhance a political point of view.

It is indeed a brave new world my friends.
Click to expand...
So which is it, is anthropogenic climate change a hoax or are "facts immutable"?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top