MKIVc knockoff recovery question

OilHead

Member
I am building a Terpp extractors MKIVc knockoff and will be running passive in the meantime before acquiring a Haskell ext-420 or a CMEP-OL. I noticed the MKIVc has 3/8" recovery line that reduces to 1/4" to connect to pumps like the trs-21 and then to the 1/4" ports on the yellow DOT recovery tanks. In my case, wouldn't it make sense to run a 3/8" filter drier and coil to a 1/2" acme recovery tank with a 3/8" flare adapter to avoid reducing for a faster recovery?
 

Fadedawg

Well-Known Member
A perfect system in Heaven would have everything on a gas stream the same size, so that the stream wasn't speeding up and slowing down, expending energy and efficiency.

On the WolfWurx Mk IVC, all recovery hoses and lines are 1/2", as are the flood hoses, but the stainless flood lines are 3/8".

The 100# recovery tank has a 3/4" valve reduced down to 1/2". The cyclonic filter drier is 1/2".

The original Mk IV was set up to run dual TR-21 recovery pumps with 1/4" attachments. I manifolded them back together at 1/2" back to the tank. By the Mk IVB, it was running a Haskel pump, bushed at the pump from 3/8" to 1/2". The filter driers were 1/2".
 

OilHead

Member
@Fadedawg

Ran a negative pressure test and it held -30" hg for about 3-4 hours, let it sit overnight and about 24 hours later was around -28.5" hg. Is this sufficient?

Also was wondering if one TRS-21 pump would be efficient or if it's not even worth the money for the meantime. If it's not much of a difference to running passive I'd much rather just save up for a Haskel than end up with dual TRS-21's.


P.S. if anyone could link a source for 20-24" 3/8 sae SS PTFE hoses, that would be clutch.
 

Carolina Dream'n

Well-Known Member
@Fadedawg

Ran a negative pressure test and it held -30" hg for about 3-4 hours, let it sit overnight and about 24 hours later was around -28.5" hg. Is this sufficient?

Also was wondering if one TRS-21 pump would be efficient or if it's not even worth the money for the meantime. If it's not much of a difference to running passive I'd much rather just save up for a Haskel than end up with dual TRS-21's.


P.S. if anyone could link a source for 20-24" 3/8 sae SS PTFE hoses, that would be clutch.
If your actually pressure testing you need to get nitrogen gas. It's a smaller molecule than butane or proane, therefore if the nitrogen doesn't leak neither will your gas.

Negative pressure tests are not enough IMO.
 

OilHead

Member
If your actually pressure testing you need to get nitrogen gas. It's a smaller molecule than butane or proane, therefore if the nitrogen doesn't leak neither will your gas.

Negative pressure tests are not enough IMO.
Was just the first step and have not got around to doing a positive pressure test. I guess that's where it really counts, as we don't want to be leaking gas. But yes, I'm planning on running nitrogen through the system. Thanks for looking out.
 

Fadedawg

Well-Known Member
@Fadedawg

Ran a negative pressure test and it held -30" hg for about 3-4 hours, let it sit overnight and about 24 hours later was around -28.5" hg. Is this sufficient?

Yes! Nature hates a vacuum, and atoms of air like N2, will leak where the larger C-3 H-8 propane or C-4 H-10 butane molecules won't. One hour without measurable loss is our acceptance standard.

Also was wondering if one TRS-21 pump would be efficient or if it's not even worth the money for the meantime. If it's not much of a difference to running passive I'd much rather just save up for a Haskel than end up with dual TRS-21's.

When running fixed displacement pumps like the TRS-21, under certain conditions, two pumps are about twice as fast as one, but once pressures go negative, that is no longer the case.

Ignoring volumetric efficiency for a moment (in Heaven), when a fixed volume pump piston makes one stroke, it pushes the volume of that cylinder out. The actual volume of gas present in that cylinder with only zero gauge or atmospheric pressure on the intake side of the pump, is different than if the intake is under vacuum or positive pressure.

If the intake is under one atmosphere of pressure (14.7psi), also known as zero gauge, and volumetric efficiency is 100%, the piston will shove out one volume of the cylinder's swept area (.7854D2 X stroke).

One atmosphere is 29.92" Hg, or 760,000 microns. If the intake is under 50% as much pressure, or about 14.96"Hg/380,000 microns, one stroke of the piston will produce 50% as much output, because only half as many molecules of gas are there, just spread further apart.

If the intake is under pressure, each multiple of 14.7 psi (one atmosphere in Heaven) will increase the actual volume of the cylinder by one volume. If the intake pressure is 45 psi, 45/14.7 psi = 3.06X, so one stroke of the piston will discharge 1 + 3.06 volumes per stroke.

There is also the issue of surface area boiling, which is limited, so exceeding its ability to vaporize is a waste of horsepower.

Sooooo, the short version is that the gas is recovered fast until you reach negative pressure and negative pressure is where you spend much of your recovery time. Two pumps are an advantage on the front end, but less so on the back end.

In commercial production, time is money, but if you have more time than money, starting with one certainly works.

P.S. if anyone could link a source for 20-24" 3/8 sae SS PTFE hoses, that would be clutch.
We used Detroit Flex for the WolfWurx Mk IVC/VC, because they sent a letter to our certifying PE showing that it met UL-21. https://detroitflexdefense.com/hose-accessories-highpressure/

A like quality hose is available from Associated Hose, Motion and Flow, and Swagelok, but without the letter. Make sure you get the carbon filled hose to dissipate static charges.

The issue with the UL-21 is permeability. PTFE hoses are permeable around 3000 psi using helium, and have to be certified to be suitable for LPG use.
 

Fadedawg

Well-Known Member
If your actually pressure testing you need to get nitrogen gas. It's a smaller molecule than butane or proane, therefore if the nitrogen doesn't leak neither will your gas.

Negative pressure tests are not enough IMO.
I agree. The system operates under both positive and negative pressure.

We test at 100 psi positive and then do the vacuum check.
 
Top