Mind Bender For You High Thinkers

the my would never exist but it the event they do they would cancel each other out either that or bounce of each other

Hahahaahaahahahahaaa!!!! I like this thread.

Stoners at their best trying to make sence of things

Wasn't the universe an immovable object before it went bang, and then became an unstoppable force, much like black holes?

I dont the universe was immovable because before the bang it gathered in force and cosmic dust and mass for it to cause the big bang .. Then releasing energy hurdling everything throughout space thus keeping it in motion ..
as for the black hole it might be an unstopable force it pulls anything and evrything it can into it destroying it...
I think there's something more dangerous then a black hole .. I think its called a "Quasar" or "Cuazar" or how ever u spell it

they would both give up fighting each other after like 5 minutes sit down and spark up a fatty and chill

i think the objects to us would disappear and the energy resulting from the paradox would destroy parallel universe

Even now,neither force can exist

If an unstoppable force met an unmovable object, I think the force would just travel around the object without moving it. Kind of like the wind and a car. If there's a parked car outside, it won't really move around in a breeze. The breeze moves around it though, which does not necessarily mean it stops, nor does the car move.

MrJDGaF said:

Wasn't the universe an immovable object before it went bang, and then became an unstoppable force, much like black holes?

Click to expand...

true and wise

lol funny shit

Ah, the timeless exercise in logic. A paradox.

An immovable object would require infinite inertia, thus infinite mass. An object of such proportions would collapse under its own gravity.

An irresistible force would require infinite energy. An impossibility in our finite universe.

Sorry you lost me lol

The unstoppable force would stop and the immoveable object would move. End of comic book

Reprogrammed said:

The unstoppable object would simply pass through the atomic structure of the immovable object.

Click to expand...

yeah ricochet would make the most sense



= hey look..i guess that is kinda like the the same thing we are talking about...maybe that would happen too....hehe

firstly, there is no such thing as an object... keep magnifying it, and all you end up with is clouds of potential and probability... but nothing physicaly there... unless you look.
Therefor the force would move through the spaces in the "object" if the object itself is unmoveable....

Question... are uni or multiverses just the particulate matter that floats around it or does it include the ether, black matter etc? If so, then space did not exist for the big bang to propagate into...

As to the original question....

well 2 theories here.
A) the unstoppable object deflects and keeps going
B) The universe ends

Couldn't it bounce? that wouldn't be stopping...

well. if the unstoppable force hits the immovable object and conservation of momentum is still good in this case...

then the unstoppable force would become an immovable force and transfer its energy into the object accelerating it to light speed where it would go into a fusion reaction (mass can't move the speed of light, this could cause it to get infinitely hot) and the resulting explosion would wipe out the universe... ?

aren't they both just forms of energy? surely there would be some sort of transference or new energy created? the theory of relativity and the quantum standard model still haven't been joined together. maybe the higgs boson will help tell us,if it exists.
or maybe they would just end up as a big massive bundle of tangled little teeny weeny strings hehe.