ArcticGranite
Well-Known Member
What do RIU members think of this issue? Where do we weigh in on it?
Sorry- no, not me.Arent you the guy who thinks CO2 causes cooler temperatures?
Sorry- no, not me.
Also why during periods of higher CO2 were there colder periods than now?
Aren't you the guy who posted those pictures of kids with guns, wearing pajamas and pots on their head?Arent you the guy who thinks CO2 causes cooler temperatures?
Aren't you the guy who posted those pictures of kids with guns, wearing pajamas and pots on their head?
That cracked me up...thanks again for that.
Maybe the poll question "Do you think man made carbon emissions contribute to Global Warming?" orThe use of "causes" makes it an unanswerable question, noone knows if we "cause" it, because for the minute, AGW is a hypothesis on the long road to becoming theory, which is a LONG way from becoming fact.
I would have posed the question "Do you think man made carbon emissions influence Global Warming?".
Hey that's me. Nowhere am I suggesting the cause.Oh, must be a different ArcticGranite, my bad.
Actually, it makes if very easy to answer: no.The use of "causes" makes it an unanswerable question, noone knows if we "cause" it, because for the minute, AGW is a hypothesis on the long road to becoming theory, which is a LONG way from becoming fact.
I would have posed the question "Do you think man made carbon emissions influence Global Warming?".
I'm searching for how to edit the question. Maybe this poll is a fail because of the question. First poll for me. I would recreate it as "Do you think carbon contributes to Global Warming?" I'm open to suggestions if edits possible. I'm interested to see our members views.I'm unclear in re one thing, and it's staying my hand from hitting a button.
Do I think industrial CO2 is the sole cause of global waring? No. Do i think it contributes? Yes. To what degree? I don't know.
Poll needs more choices imo. cn
If you'd posed the question like that I'd have answered: I think man contributes and possibly accelerates cyclical global warming (it is proven to be cyclical as an aside from the AGW debate), but to what degree does this influence extend I'm not sure.Maybe the poll question "Do you think man made carbon emissions contribute to Global Warming?" or
"Do you think carbon contributes to Global Warming?"
I think you as OP have the ability to edit the poll. I cannot reach it. If you can't, a global or admin might be needed. Chiceh is a global who has always impressed me with her service spirit and general pleasant demeanor.I'm searching for how to edit the question. Maybe this poll is a fail because of the question. First poll for me. I would recreate it as "Do you think carbon contributes to Global Warming?" I'm open to suggestions if edits possible. I'm interested to see our members views.
440 GT from the Biosphere and 330 GT from the ocean and 10 GT from man. Roughly 12% of atmospheric CO2 is man made. CO2 comprises .04% of the atmosphere.Pumping 10.28 billion metric tonnes of carbon per year into the atmosphere is completely harmless. Any idiot could see that.
the real question is "Is there Global Warming at all?" since the current cold spell is bringing back the 1970's new ice age rumors. this is why the touts are moving away from "Global Warming" and embracing "Climate Change"440 GT from the Biosphere and 330 GT from the ocean and 10 GT from man. Roughly 12% of atmospheric CO2 is man made. CO2 comprises .04% of the atmosphere.
Roughly .005% of the atmosphere is comprised of man made CO2. Five one-thousandths of one percent. That is a doomsday scenario!
Please, do tell, how is this warming the globe.
Dude, everyone knows Vespene Geysers emerge above ground level, what's this "underground" shit your touting? It sounds like pure crazy talk to me.the real question is "Is there Global Warming at all?" since the current cold spell is bringing back the 1970's new ice age rumors. this is why the touts are moving away from "Global Warming" and embracing "Climate Change"your numbers are wrong though,CO2 currently makes up about 3-4% of atmospheric gasses, not .04% at .04% CO2 concentrations, plants would not be able to survive. nobody is sure exaclty how much CO2 comes from the "biosphere" since termites bacterium in swamps, and wild herbivores dont fill out census cards or keep journals of their flatulencenobody is sure exactly how much CO2 the ocean has lost from it's massive store of gasses since the best estimates of oceanic gasses are only estimates based on averages, but the oceans warm and cool in sections, not like a bowl of jello in the fridge overnight. you didnt even mention the geological sources of CO2, nor can anyone accurately estimate the amount of CO2 eliminated from the atmosphere on any given day by photosynthesis from land and sea bourne plants and algae. the best anyone can say right now is, over the last 60 years CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere have increased by .5% to 1% overall from 2.5% to 3-4% +/- .3-.5% all things considered, it's not doomsday yet, and it certainly isnt enough to cause the nightmare global crisis the touts are screaming about. CO2 concentrations have been MUCH higher and MUCH lower in the past (6-7% during the huge glaciation before last, round about 40,000 years ago, to as low as 1.5% in the cambrian explosion) and the earth still endures. right now im more concerned about the possibility that aliens might invade, and fo9rce us to work in their underground vespene gas mines than global warming.