List of questions to prove 24/0 over 18/6

do you think that 24/0 costs more than 18/6

  • Total voters
    8
  • Poll closed .
Coolvibes

Coolvibes

Well-Known Member
i am willing to listen to what you say one question at a time though
Question 1 .
i planted 21 el_neno all went in the grow room same time now out of 21 seeds one is 5 cm and one is 13 but the others are within 20mil of one and other all had same light all had same feed same every think why did this happen. then my next question until we get to the cost issue and come on i got you heated enough to reply so not that stupid and if you smoke weed most of your friends like me when stoned on blue cheese are retard fact mawiwai makes you dumb ass stoned lol plant verdict and answer please mate

kind regards
coolvibes
 
Coolvibes

Coolvibes

Well-Known Member
Question 2. Assuming that the other 19 plants continue in the same trend. And I wanted to make them bud at 1 meter and it took 4 weeks on 24/0. Would it not be true to say if I only had the lights on 18/6 they would have took 25%longer?? If your answer is no why??
kind regards
Coolvibes
 
BlueFish

BlueFish

Active Member
Coolvibes said:
i am willing to listen to what you say one question at a time though
Question 1 .
i planted 21 el_neno all went in the grow room same time now out of 21 seeds one is 5 cm and one is 13 but the others are within 20mil of one and other all had same light all had same feed same every think why did this happen. then my next question until we get to the cost issue and come on i got you heated enough to reply so not that stupid and if you smoke weed most of your friends like me when stoned on blue cheese are retard fact mawiwai makes you dumb ass stoned lol plant verdict and answer please mate

kind regards
coolvibes
Click to expand...
Already answered that question.
Question 2. Assuming that the other 19 plants continue in the same trend. And I wanted to make them bud at 1 meter and it took 4 weeks on 24/0. Would it not be true to say if I only had the lights on 18/6 they would have took 25%longer?? If your answer is no why??
Click to expand...
kind regards
Coolvibes
Click to expand...

No. I've explained this to you several times. Plant growth does not scale linearly with photoperiod. Plants can only use so much light, and after a certain point they can't utilize any more. The chemical reactions that produce energy for the plant are limited by more than available photons. Just because you want to believe it doesn't make it true. Go ask any botanist, they'll tell you the same thing.

It doesn't matter how bad you want to be right, you just aren't.
 
A

Afka

Active Member
Plants do different things while exposed to light and in darkness.


During the day they produce and stock "energy" (It's not "energy" but proteins and acids and carbs) They use some of it immediately, but also warehouse some of it.

When you turn the lights off, or should a cloud go by, it will use up it's saved energy.

I read your other thread, OP, and you are wrong. Because you have no methodology, nor do you understand methodology. You came to a shot in the dark conclusion, which you are touting (spamming) as an absolute truth.



Veg is not over at some arbitrary amount of hours of light. Technically, it's over when the plant matures and shows preflowers, starts alternating nodes, etc. But really, considering you used SEEDS, which are all like brothers and sisters, not identical clones, they all grew at different rates.


Do you look exactly like your brother or sister? I'm tall and skinny, my brother is shorter and a bit beefier. Clearly I must have been on 18/6 because I stretched more. Or something.


Right? This is scientific? Absolute proof?
 
figtree

figtree

Active Member
Ed rosenthal:
Ask Ed: west coast canabis magazine volume 2, issue 11 november 09.
Question: 18 or 24 hours of light?

Summary: although cutting the light from 24 to 18 hours daily saves about 25 percent on the electric bill, it is actually more costly than running the lighting continuously. the reason is that you are still paying fothe same amount of rent, using the same amount of soil, labor, machinery, and taking the same risks wether the lights are on or off. all costs except electricity remain the same. however the plants growing under 18 hours of light are only three quarters the size of plants growing under continuous light. the savings in electricity doesnt make up for the loss of growth.

just thought i'd post this for yall, Ask Ed kicks ass.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top